Advertisement
CL vs PG
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Colgate-Palmolive (CL) vs. Procter & Gamble (PG) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- CL has outperformed PG year-to-date (YTD, meaning from the start of the current year), gaining about 11% versus 4%.
- Recent quarterly earnings for both stocks beat estimates, with CL reporting 8.4% net sales growth and PG 7% sales increase.
- PG offers a higher dividend yield at 2.9% compared to CL's 2.4%, appealing to income-focused investors.
- CL trades at a higher P/E ratio (price-to-earnings, a valuation metric) of 33 versus PG's 22, reflecting growth expectations.
- Emerging markets have driven CL's recent momentum, while PG benefits from broader diversification.
Introduction
Colgate-Palmolive (CL) and Procter & Gamble (PG) are leading consumer staples companies, offering essential products like oral care, household cleaners, and personal care items. This CL vs. PG stock comparison examines their relative performance, growth drivers, and market positioning in the current environment. Defensive stocks like these appeal to traders seeking stability amid volatility and investors prioritizing dividends and consistent demand. Recent earnings and price trends highlight contrasts in momentum and valuation, aiding decisions on relative performance and portfolio allocation.
CL Overview and Recent Performance
Colgate-Palmolive (CL) focuses on oral care, personal care, home care, and pet nutrition products, with strong global presence especially in emerging markets. In recent market activity, CL shares traded around $87, within a 52-week range of $74.55 to $99.33, reflecting resilience. The first-quarter 2026 earnings, reported in early May, showed net sales up 8.4% to $5.32 billion and organic sales growth of 2.9%, beating estimates with EPS (earnings per share) of $0.97 versus $0.94 expected. Volume growth exceeded expectations by 13 times, fueled by innovation and emerging markets, though cost pressures persist. Shares rose post-earnings, contributing to YTD gains of about 11%, amid positive analyst updates like higher price targets. Sentiment has improved on accelerated growth.
PG Overview and Recent Performance
Procter & Gamble (PG) is a diversified giant in beauty, grooming, health care, fabric/home care, and baby/feminine products, serving global households. Shares recently hovered near $147, in a 52-week range of $137.62 to $170.99. Fiscal third-quarter 2026 results, released late April, featured sales growth of 7% to $21.24 billion and core EPS of $1.59, surpassing forecasts of $20.5 billion revenue and $1.56 EPS. Organic sales rose 3%, supported by pricing, though volumes softened slightly amid cost headwinds. The company raised its dividend for the 70th year. YTD performance stands at around 4%, with mixed analyst views including raised targets from UBS and others. Recent weeks show steady but modest momentum.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases 25 top-performing AI trading bots curated from over 350 available, each trading thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto with diverse strategies like swing trading, scalping, and sector focus. These bots deliver real-time signals with risk management, boasting impressive stats such as annualized returns from 32% to 163%, win rates of 51% to 88%, and profit factors up to 11.7. Timeframes range from 5 minutes to 60 days, targeting hot areas like semiconductors, AI infrastructure, space, industrials, small caps, and gold miners. Explore these high-performing options tailored to current volatility for potential edge in trading CL, PG, or broader markets.
Head-to-Head Comparison
In business models, PG’s vast diversification across categories provides stability, while CL excels in niche oral care leadership. Growth drivers favor CL’s emerging market volume surge versus PG’s pricing-led gains. Recent momentum tilts to CL with stronger YTD returns and post-earnings pop, though PG’s larger $343 billion market cap dwarfs CL’s $70 billion. Risk factors include CL’s elevated P/E and debt-to-equity, amplifying volatility, versus PG’s conservative profile. Both share consumer staples exposure, but sentiment leans positive for CL on growth acceleration amid trade-offs in valuation and scale.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward CL with higher probability due to consistent trend strength, YTD outperformance, and earnings momentum from emerging markets. PG offers superior stability and yield, but lacks CL’s recent catalysts. Positioning favors CL for growth-oriented traders in the near term, based on observable relative strength.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CL is a Buy and PG is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- CL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- PG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- PG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CL (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а +0.98% price change this week, while PG (@Household/Personal Care) price change was +2.09% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +14.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.86%.
Reported Earning Dates
CL is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2026.
PG is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Household/Personal Care (+14.51% weekly)Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.
| CL | PG | CL / PG | |
| Capitalization | 71.6B | 348B | 21% |
| EBITDA | 3.9B | 24.9B | 16% |
| Gain YTD | 14.600 | 5.928 | 246% |
| P/E Ratio | 34.67 | 21.87 | 159% |
| Revenue | 20.8B | 86.7B | 24% |
| Total Cash | 1.34B | 12.3B | 11% |
| Total Debt | 7.97B | 37B | 22% |
CL | PG | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 88 | 18 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 95 Overvalued | 29 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 70 | 57 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 4 | 32 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 28 | 69 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PG's Valuation (29) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is significantly better than the same rating for CL (95). This means that PG’s stock grew significantly faster than CL’s over the last 12 months.
PG's Profit vs Risk Rating (57) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as CL (70). This means that PG’s stock grew similarly to CL’s over the last 12 months.
CL's SMR Rating (4) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as PG (32). This means that CL’s stock grew similarly to PG’s over the last 12 months.
CL's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as PG (52). This means that CL’s stock grew similarly to PG’s over the last 12 months.
CL's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PG (69). This means that CL’s stock grew somewhat faster than PG’s over the last 12 months.
| CL | PG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 38% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 38% | 2 days ago 42% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 39% | 2 days ago 37% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 40% | 2 days ago 41% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 48% | 2 days ago 44% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 37% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 45% | 4 days ago 46% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 44% | 13 days ago 42% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 46% | 2 days ago 41% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 44% | 2 days ago 32% |
Advertisement
CL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CL has been closely correlated with PG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CL jumps, then PG could also see price increases.
PG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PG has been closely correlated with CL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PG jumps, then CL could also see price increases.