It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CLH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWCN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CLH’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WCN’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
CLH (@Environmental Services) experienced а -5.63% price change this week, while WCN (@Environmental Services) price change was -3.15% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was -4.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.24%.
CLH is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2025.
WCN is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2025.
Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.
CLH | WCN | CLH / WCN | |
Capitalization | 10.6B | 43.9B | 24% |
EBITDA | 990M | 2.26B | 44% |
Gain YTD | 32.101 | 17.546 | 183% |
P/E Ratio | 28.35 | 57.76 | 49% |
Revenue | 5.41B | 8.02B | 67% |
Total Cash | 551M | 78.4M | 703% |
Total Debt | 2.49B | 7.02B | 35% |
CLH | WCN | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 76 | 54 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 80 Overvalued | 89 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 8 | 8 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 51 | 62 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 55 | 56 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | 56 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CLH's Valuation (80) in the Environmental Services industry is in the same range as WCN (89). This means that CLH’s stock grew similarly to WCN’s over the last 12 months.
CLH's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Environmental Services industry is in the same range as WCN (8). This means that CLH’s stock grew similarly to WCN’s over the last 12 months.
CLH's SMR Rating (51) in the Environmental Services industry is in the same range as WCN (62). This means that CLH’s stock grew similarly to WCN’s over the last 12 months.
CLH's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Environmental Services industry is in the same range as WCN (56). This means that CLH’s stock grew similarly to WCN’s over the last 12 months.
CLH's P/E Growth Rating (41) in the Environmental Services industry is in the same range as WCN (56). This means that CLH’s stock grew similarly to WCN’s over the last 12 months.
CLH | WCN | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago72% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago74% | 3 days ago62% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago59% | 3 days ago31% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago64% | 3 days ago34% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago55% | 3 days ago38% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago57% | 3 days ago33% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago70% | 27 days ago55% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago53% | 4 days ago40% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago85% | 3 days ago74% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago73% | 3 days ago45% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
XITK | 177.63 | 2.71 | +1.55% |
SPDR® FactSet Innovative Technology ETF | |||
IVW | 102.76 | 1.09 | +1.07% |
iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF | |||
FYLD | 24.86 | 0.22 | +0.90% |
Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF | |||
SQLV | 42.37 | 0.05 | +0.12% |
Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF | |||
FSTA | 49.97 | 0.01 | +0.03% |
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLH has been loosely correlated with CWST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLH jumps, then CWST could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLH | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CLH | 100% | -1.31% | ||
CWST - CLH | 49% Loosely correlated | +0.55% | ||
WCN - CLH | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.09% | ||
NVRI - CLH | 40% Loosely correlated | +4.09% | ||
GFL - CLH | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.44% | ||
LICY - CLH | 27% Poorly correlated | +4.23% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WCN has been loosely correlated with RSG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WCN jumps, then RSG could also see price increases.