CMBT
Price
$16.70
Change
+$0.12 (+0.72%)
Updated
Oct 11 closing price
25 days until earnings call
INSW
Price
$51.93
Change
-$0.09 (-0.17%)
Updated
Oct 11 closing price
23 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CMBT vs INSW

Header iconCMBT vs INSW Comparison
Open Charts CMBT vs INSWBanner chart's image
Euronav
Price$16.70
Change+$0.12 (+0.72%)
Volume$37.84K
CapitalizationN/A
International Seaways
Price$51.93
Change-$0.09 (-0.17%)
Volume$405.13K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
CMBT vs INSW Comparison Chart
Loading...
CMBT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
INSW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
CMBT vs. INSW commentary
Oct 13, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMBT is a Buy and INSW is a StrongSell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 13, 2024
Stock price -- (CMBT: $16.70 vs. INSW: $51.93)
Brand notoriety: CMBT: Notable vs. INSW: Not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Pipelines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMBT: 36% vs. INSW: 69%
Market capitalization -- CMBT: $3.23B vs. INSW: $2.6B
CMBT [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] is valued at $3.23B. INSW’s [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] market capitalization is $2.6B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry ranges from $76.58B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry is $10.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMBT’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileINSW’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CMBT’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • INSW’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, INSW is a better buy in the long-term than CMBT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMBT’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while INSW’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMBT’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • INSW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CMBT is a better buy in the short-term than INSW.

Price Growth

CMBT (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а -3.19% price change this week, while INSW (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was -2.93% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +4.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.42%.

Reported Earning Dates

CMBT is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.

INSW is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Pipelines (+4.09% weekly)

Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMBT($3.23B) has a higher market cap than INSW($2.6B). INSW has higher P/E ratio than CMBT: INSW (4.82) vs CMBT (3.89). INSW YTD gains are higher at: 24.511 vs. CMBT (1.829). CMBT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.05B vs. INSW (755M). INSW has more cash in the bank: 187M vs. CMBT (160M). INSW has less debt than CMBT: INSW (745M) vs CMBT (1.79B). CMBT has higher revenues than INSW: CMBT (1.34B) vs INSW (1.07B).
CMBTINSWCMBT / INSW
Capitalization3.23B2.6B124%
EBITDA1.05B755M139%
Gain YTD1.82924.5117%
P/E Ratio3.894.8281%
Revenue1.34B1.07B125%
Total Cash160M187M86%
Total Debt1.79B745M241%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMBT vs INSW: Fundamental Ratings
CMBT
INSW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4085
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
1
Undervalued
7
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
248
SMR RATING
1..100
1634
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4949
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9226
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4950

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CMBT's Valuation (1) in the null industry is in the same range as INSW (7) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that CMBT’s stock grew similarly to INSW’s over the last 12 months.

INSW's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as CMBT (24) in the null industry. This means that INSW’s stock grew similarly to CMBT’s over the last 12 months.

CMBT's SMR Rating (16) in the null industry is in the same range as INSW (34) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that CMBT’s stock grew similarly to INSW’s over the last 12 months.

CMBT's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as INSW (49) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that CMBT’s stock grew similarly to INSW’s over the last 12 months.

INSW's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the Marine Shipping industry is significantly better than the same rating for CMBT (92) in the null industry. This means that INSW’s stock grew significantly faster than CMBT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMBTINSW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CMBT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
INSW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X63193.023000747.933600
+1.20%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY579.583.45
+0.60%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
GME20.83-0.08
-0.38%
GameStop Corp
AAPL227.55-1.49
-0.65%
Apple
TSLA217.80-20.97
-8.78%
Tesla

CMBT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMBT has been loosely correlated with HYTLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CMBT jumps, then HYTLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMBT
1D Price
Change %
CMBT100%
+0.72%
HYTLF - CMBT
53%
Loosely correlated
N/A
NVGS - CMBT
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.37%
FRO - CMBT
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.74%
TRMD - CMBT
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.49%
INSW - CMBT
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.17%
More

INSW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INSW has been closely correlated with TNK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if INSW jumps, then TNK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To INSW
1D Price
Change %
INSW100%
-0.17%
TNK - INSW
81%
Closely correlated
+0.30%
DHT - INSW
77%
Closely correlated
-0.59%
STNG - INSW
77%
Closely correlated
-0.14%
FRO - INSW
70%
Closely correlated
-0.74%
TK - INSW
70%
Closely correlated
-0.97%
More