CMBT
Price
$15.46
Change
-$0.50 (-3.13%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Capitalization
4.6B
63 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
INSW
Price
$87.72
Change
-$2.26 (-2.51%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Capitalization
4.34B
48 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMBT vs INSW

CMBT vs INSW Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMBT vs. INSW commentary
Jun 25, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMBT is a Buy and INSW is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 25, 2026
Stock price -- (CMBT: $15.46 vs. INSW: $87.72)
Brand notoriety: CMBT: Notable vs. INSW: Not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Pipelines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMBT: 55% vs. INSW: 114%
Market capitalization -- CMBT: $4.6B vs. INSW: $4.34B
CMBT [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] is valued at $4.6B. INSW’s [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] market capitalization is $4.34B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry ranges from $121.52B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry is $16.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMBT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileINSW’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CMBT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • INSW’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, INSW is a better buy in the long-term than CMBT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMBT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while INSW’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMBT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • INSW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CMBT and INSW are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CMBT (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а +5.10% price change this week, while INSW (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was +7.70% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +0.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +27.21%.

Reported Earning Dates

CMBT is expected to report earnings on Aug 27, 2026.

INSW is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Pipelines (+0.08% weekly)

Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMBT($4.6B) has a higher market cap than INSW($4.34B). CMBT has higher P/E ratio than INSW: CMBT (8.78) vs INSW (8.05). INSW YTD gains are higher at: 97.143 vs. CMBT (75.104). CMBT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 883M vs. INSW (750M). INSW has less debt than CMBT: INSW (610M) vs CMBT (5.24B). CMBT has higher revenues than INSW: CMBT (1.95B) vs INSW (985M).
CMBTINSWCMBT / INSW
Capitalization4.6B4.34B106%
EBITDA883M750M118%
Gain YTD75.10497.14377%
P/E Ratio8.788.05109%
Revenue1.95B985M198%
Total Cash203MN/A-
Total Debt5.24B610M860%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMBT vs INSW: Fundamental Ratings
CMBT
INSW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7121
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6212
SMR RATING
1..100
4135
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3836
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1027
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5090

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CMBT's Valuation (13) in the null industry is in the same range as INSW (17) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that CMBT’s stock grew similarly to INSW’s over the last 12 months.

INSW's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Marine Shipping industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMBT (62) in the null industry. This means that INSW’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMBT’s over the last 12 months.

INSW's SMR Rating (35) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as CMBT (41) in the null industry. This means that INSW’s stock grew similarly to CMBT’s over the last 12 months.

INSW's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as CMBT (38) in the null industry. This means that INSW’s stock grew similarly to CMBT’s over the last 12 months.

CMBT's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is in the same range as INSW (27) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that CMBT’s stock grew similarly to INSW’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMBTINSW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMBT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
INSW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VIS351.353.83
+1.10%
Vanguard Industrials ETF
JMTG50.630.21
+0.42%
JPMorgan Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF
MYY15.21-0.07
-0.45%
ProShares Short MidCap400
MVFD29.84-0.14
-0.47%
Monarch Volume Factor Dividend Tree ETF
YINN23.20-1.05
-4.33%
Direxion Daily FTSE China Bull 3X ETF

CMBT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMBT has been loosely correlated with FRO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CMBT jumps, then FRO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMBT
1D Price
Change %
CMBT100%
-3.13%
FRO - CMBT
61%
Loosely correlated
-5.04%
TEN - CMBT
59%
Loosely correlated
-4.88%
INSW - CMBT
58%
Loosely correlated
-2.51%
TNK - CMBT
57%
Loosely correlated
-3.62%
DHT - CMBT
53%
Loosely correlated
-2.86%
More

INSW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INSW has been closely correlated with TNK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if INSW jumps, then TNK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To INSW
1D Price
Change %
INSW100%
-2.51%
TNK - INSW
87%
Closely correlated
-3.62%
FRO - INSW
82%
Closely correlated
-5.04%
TEN - INSW
81%
Closely correlated
-4.88%
DHT - INSW
79%
Closely correlated
-2.86%
STNG - INSW
78%
Closely correlated
-4.05%
More