Investors scanning the maritime shipping sector are likely to encounter two compelling but structurally different names: CMB.TECH NV and International Seaways, Inc. Both operate large oceangoing fleets and generate revenue from the transportation of energy commodities, yet their strategies, asset bases, and market positioning vary materially. This comparison is particularly relevant for traders and investors seeking to understand how a diversified maritime conglomerate stacks up against a focused tanker pure-play under current market conditions. With tanker rates supported by favorable supply-demand dynamics and geopolitical disruptions boosting ton-mile demand, both companies have posted strong returns — but through distinctly different paths.
CMBT, or CMB.TECH NV, is one of the world's largest diversified maritime groups, headquartered in Antwerp, Belgium. Following the completion of its transformative stock-for-stock merger with Golden Ocean Group in August 2025, the combined entity now operates a fleet of approximately 250 vessels. These span dry bulk carriers, crude oil tankers, chemical tankers, container ships, offshore wind vessels, and port vessels, with a reported fair market value of roughly $11.1 billion and an average fleet age of just 6.1 years. The company also maintains a growing presence in hydrogen and ammonia fuel production and distribution, positioning it at the intersection of maritime transport and the energy transition.
In recent weeks, CMBT shares have traded in a range between roughly $14 and $16, recovering from a 52-week low near $7.78 reached in late summer 2025. The stock's year-to-date gain of approximately 73% reflects improving sentiment as the market digests the benefits of the Golden Ocean integration, including a contract backlog of roughly $3 billion and enhanced revenue visibility. The company's trailing-twelve-month revenue has reached approximately $1.95 billion, supported by strong dry bulk and tanker markets. In October 2025, CMB.TECH opted not to proceed with a planned senior unsecured bond issuance, citing more favorable funding alternatives — a move that underscored management's disciplined approach to capital costs. A modest net loss in Q2 2025 gave way to improving fleet utilization and TCE (Time Charter Equivalent) rates across its segments heading into subsequent quarters.
INSW, International Seaways, Inc., is one of the largest publicly traded tanker companies in the world, headquartered in New York City. The company owns and operates a fleet of approximately 70 oceangoing vessels, including VLCCs (Very Large Crude Carriers), Suezmaxes, Aframaxes, LR1s, LR2s, and MR (Medium Range) product carriers. Unlike CMB.TECH's multi-segment approach, INSW is a pure-play on crude oil and petroleum product seaborne transportation, offering investors direct exposure to tanker rate cycles.
The stock has been a standout performer in the maritime sector, with shares climbing from a 52-week low of approximately $39 to recent levels above $92 — a one-year return of approximately 156%. Full-year 2025 net income totaled $309 million, or $6.23 per diluted share, with adjusted EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization) reaching $475 million. In recent weeks, INSW has continued to benefit from strong tanker market fundamentals, including oil demand growth exceeding one million barrels per day, constrained fleet supply, and increased enforcement actions against sanctioned tonnage. The company's fleet optimization program has been notably active: selling older vessels while taking delivery of newbuild LR1s and acquiring a modern 2020-built VLCC. In January 2026, INSW consolidated full ownership of Tankers International, a leading VLCC pool, and expanded into Suezmax commercial management. The balance sheet remains robust, with a net loan-to-value ratio of approximately 13% and total liquidity of $724 million as of year-end 2025.
For traders seeking a data-driven edge in evaluating stocks like CMBT and INSW, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of top-performing AI trading bots. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI-powered trading bots that collectively trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and market segments. However, only the bots demonstrating the strongest adaptability to current market conditions earn a place in the Trending AI Robots section. These bots have delivered annualized returns ranging from approximately 78% to as high as 290% among leading strategies, with some achieving win rates above 72%. Each bot employs distinct methodologies — from swing trading and trend following to breakout detection and pattern recognition — using Financial Learning Models (FLMs) that continuously retrain on real-time data. Traders can explore bots operating on 5-minute, 15-minute, hourly, and daily timeframes, spanning market capitalizations from small-cap to mega-cap. To discover which AI trading strategies are currently outperforming, visit the Trending AI Robots page and find a bot aligned with your trading style.
The most fundamental difference between CMBT and INSW lies in their business model scope. CMB.TECH is a diversified maritime conglomerate with exposure to dry bulk, crude and chemical tankers, containers, and offshore wind — a structure that can smooth earnings volatility across shipping cycles but may also dilute the upside when any single segment experiences a super-cycle. International Seaways, by contrast, is a focused tanker operator, meaning its earnings are more directly leveraged to crude and product tanker rates, which have been buoyed by OPEC+ production normalization, shifting trade patterns, and sanctions-driven inefficiencies.
On growth drivers, CMBT is betting on fleet scale and diversification, including its hydrogen and ammonia fuel initiatives, which represent a longer-dated, energy-transition-oriented growth narrative. INSW is executing a disciplined fleet renewal strategy — selling aging tonnage at favorable prices and acquiring modern, scrubber-fitted vessels — while returning the majority of adjusted net income to shareholders through a combined regular and supplemental dividend policy. INSW's payout ratio has exceeded 75% for five consecutive quarters, and cumulative shareholder returns have surpassed $1 billion since 2020.
From a risk perspective, CMBT carries integration risk from the Golden Ocean merger and broader exposure to multiple freight markets, including the structurally challenged container segment and a softening chemical tanker market. INSW faces concentrated tanker-rate risk and geopolitical uncertainty tied to Middle East stability and OPEC+ policy shifts. INSW's beta of approximately -0.09 suggests a near-zero correlation with broader equity markets, while CMBT's beta of roughly 0.14 is similarly low, reflecting the idiosyncratic nature of shipping equities. On recent momentum, INSW's approximately 107% year-to-date gain and 156% one-year return have handily outpaced CMBT's still-impressive 73% and 80% respective figures, indicating stronger relative market positioning in the current environment.
Based on observable factors — including trend consistency, earnings momentum, capital allocation discipline, and relative market positioning — Tickeron's AI would likely express a near-term preference for INSW over CMBT. International Seaways benefits from a powerful alignment of favorable tanker market fundamentals: robust oil demand growth, constrained vessel supply, sanctions-driven fleet inefficiencies, and an aging global tanker fleet that supports elevated TCE rates. The company's consistent dividend policy, low balance-sheet leverage, and active fleet optimization create a clear, measurable catalyst narrative. That said, CMB.TECH's diversified fleet and emerging clean-fuel business represent a structurally differentiated value proposition that may appeal to AI models favoring multi-factor risk distribution and longer-horizon positioning. Neither stock is without risk, and the AI verdict reflects probabilistic analysis rather than certainty. In a market environment where tanker rates remain the dominant near-term catalyst, the edge appears to tilt toward International Seaways.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CMBT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileINSW’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CMBT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while INSW’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
CMBT (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а +2.05% price change this week, while INSW (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was -4.06% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was -0.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.46%.
CMBT is expected to report earnings on Aug 27, 2026.
INSW is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2026.
Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.
| CMBT | INSW | CMBT / INSW | |
| Capitalization | 4.66B | 4.49B | 104% |
| EBITDA | 883M | 750M | 118% |
| Gain YTD | 80.201 | 103.862 | 77% |
| P/E Ratio | 9.14 | 8.26 | 111% |
| Revenue | 1.95B | 985M | 198% |
| Total Cash | 203M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 5.24B | 610M | 860% |
CMBT | INSW | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 17 | 28 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 14 Undervalued | 17 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 58 | 10 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 42 | 37 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 36 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 9 | 30 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CMBT's Valuation (14) in the null industry is in the same range as INSW (17) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that CMBT’s stock grew similarly to INSW’s over the last 12 months.
INSW's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the Marine Shipping industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMBT (58) in the null industry. This means that INSW’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMBT’s over the last 12 months.
INSW's SMR Rating (37) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as CMBT (42) in the null industry. This means that INSW’s stock grew similarly to CMBT’s over the last 12 months.
INSW's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as CMBT (38) in the null industry. This means that INSW’s stock grew similarly to CMBT’s over the last 12 months.
CMBT's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the null industry is in the same range as INSW (30) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that CMBT’s stock grew similarly to INSW’s over the last 12 months.
| CMBT | INSW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 61% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 65% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 7 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 68% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 72% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FTRB | 24.83 | 0.01 | +0.04% |
| Federated Hermes Total Return Bond ETF | |||
| VCLT | 72.60 | 0.01 | +0.01% |
| Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bd ETF | |||
| IQHI | 25.82 | N/A | N/A |
| NYLI MacKay High Income ETF | |||
| EFU | 6.81 | -0.02 | -0.23% |
| ProShares UltraShort MSCI EAFE | |||
| HERZ | 16.08 | -0.13 | -0.80% |
| Herzfeld Credit Income Fund Inc. | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMBT has been closely correlated with TEN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CMBT jumps, then TEN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CMBT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CMBT | 100% | -0.06% | ||
| TEN - CMBT | 66% Closely correlated | -2.11% | ||
| FRO - CMBT | 63% Loosely correlated | -2.57% | ||
| INSW - CMBT | 61% Loosely correlated | -2.01% | ||
| TNK - CMBT | 60% Loosely correlated | -3.10% | ||
| TK - CMBT | 58% Loosely correlated | -3.21% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INSW has been closely correlated with TNK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if INSW jumps, then TNK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To INSW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| INSW | 100% | -2.01% | ||
| TNK - INSW | 87% Closely correlated | -3.10% | ||
| TK - INSW | 83% Closely correlated | -3.21% | ||
| DHT - INSW | 81% Closely correlated | -1.49% | ||
| FRO - INSW | 81% Closely correlated | -2.57% | ||
| TEN - INSW | 81% Closely correlated | -2.11% | ||
More | ||||