Advertisement
COST vs MFUT
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COST is a Buy and MFUT is a Hold.
COST in upward trend: price rose above 50-day moving average on October 06, 2026
COST moved above its 50-day moving average on October 06, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend. In 31 of 50 similar past instances, the stock price increased further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 62%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The 10-day moving average for COST crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on October 12, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 8 of 19 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 42%.
Following a +4.54% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where COST advanced for three days, in 214 of 350 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 61%.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 166 of 327 cases where COST Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 51%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The RSI Indicator has been in the overbought zone for 1 day. Expect a price pull-back in the near future.
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 6 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where COST declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 40%.
COST broke above its upper Bollinger Band on November 04, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 8 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating low risk on high returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 56, placing this stock better than average.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 26 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating outstanding price growth. COST’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 34 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 38 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to consistent earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 100 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: COST's P/B Ratio (13.937) is very high in comparison to the industry average of (5.834). COST has a moderately high P/E Ratio (52.916) as compared to the industry average of (24.535). COST's Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (4.478) is slightly higher than the industry average of (2.171). Dividend Yield (0.006) settles around the average of (0.010) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (1.353) is also within normal values, averaging (1.008).
MFUT in -3.41% downward trend, falling for three consecutive days on November 05, 2026
Moving lower for three straight days is viewed as a bearish sign. Keep an eye on this stock for future declines. Considering data from situations where MFUT declined for three days, in 82 of 114 cases, the price declined further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 72%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 16, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on MFUT as a result. In 24 of 36 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 67%.
MFUT moved below its 50-day moving average on October 15, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
The 10-day moving average for MFUT crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on October 22, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 1 of 4 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 25%.
The Aroon Indicator for MFUT entered a downward trend on November 10, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Bullish Trend Analysis
The RSI Oscillator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where MFUT's RSI Indicator exited the oversold zone, 13 of 20 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 65%.
The Stochastic Oscillator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 12 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an upward trend is expected.
Following a +1.39% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where MFUT advanced for three days, in 120 of 151 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 79%.
MFUT may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
COST | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 40 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 100 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 8 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 34 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 26 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| COST | MFUT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 40% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 42% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 67% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 61% | about 1 month ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 40% | 7 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 40% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 69% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
COST’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while .
- COST’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
COST’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- COST’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
COST (@Discount Stores) experienced а +4.60% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Discount Stores industry was +0.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +28.43%.
Reported Earning Dates
COST is expected to report earnings on Dec 10, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Discount Stores (+0.10% weekly)Companies in the discount stores industry specialize in offering substantial discounts on a vast array of retail products. Some companies in this industry also operate general merchandise warehouse clubs. Products sold at discount stores are typically similar to those of any department store, but the pricing of the goods is generally much lower (and hence the name “discount”). Think Dollar General Corporation, Dollar Tree, Inc. and Five Below, Inc. Many discount stores target low-income households and/or price-sensitive consumers as their potential market. Discount stores’ profitability could hinge on factors like competitive pricing, sufficient locations, healthy revenue per square foot, and effective advertisement. These store operators could have an edge over other retailers during financial crises or recessions, when many consumers could be looking for less expensive alternatives.
Advertisement
COST and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COST has been loosely correlated with WMT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if COST jumps, then WMT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To COST | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COST | 100% | -0.00% | ||
| WMT - COST | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.09% | ||
| PSMT - COST | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.48% | ||
| DG - COST | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.46% | ||
| DLTR - COST | 20% Poorly correlated | +2.62% | ||
| OLLI - COST | 19% Poorly correlated | +0.52% | ||
More | ||||
MFUT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MFUT and HON have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MFUT and HON's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MFUT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MFUT | 100% | +0.80% | ||
| HON - MFUT | 15% Poorly correlated | -0.34% | ||
| CSCO - MFUT | 11% Poorly correlated | -0.51% | ||
| SPGI - MFUT | 9% Poorly correlated | +0.49% | ||
| NVDA - MFUT | 8% Poorly correlated | -5.53% | ||
| COST - MFUT | 8% Poorly correlated | -0.00% | ||
More | ||||