COST
Price
$982.35
Change
+$6.66 (+0.68%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
435.65B
101 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
OLLI
Price
$83.25
Change
-$0.40 (-0.48%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
5.03B
73 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

COST vs OLLI

Header iconCOST vs OLLI Comparison
Open Charts COST vs OLLIBanner chart's image
COST vs OLLI Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
COST vs. OLLI commentary
Jun 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COST is a Buy and OLLI is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 15, 2026
Stock price -- (COST: $982.35 vs. OLLI: $83.25)
Brand notoriety: COST: Notable vs. OLLI: Not notable
Both companies represent the Discount Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COST: 82% vs. OLLI: 179%
Market capitalization -- COST: $435.65B vs. OLLI: $5.03B
COST [@Discount Stores] is valued at $435.65B. OLLI’s [@Discount Stores] market capitalization is $5.03B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Discount Stores] industry ranges from $963.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Discount Stores] industry is $170.55B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COST’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOLLI’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • COST’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • OLLI’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, COST is a better buy in the long-term than OLLI.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

COST’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OLLI’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • COST’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • OLLI’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, COST is a better buy in the short-term than OLLI.

Price Growth

COST (@Discount Stores) experienced а +1.08% price change this week, while OLLI (@Discount Stores) price change was +8.54% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Discount Stores industry was +5.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.14%.

Reported Earning Dates

COST is expected to report earnings on Sep 24, 2026.

OLLI is expected to report earnings on Aug 27, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Discount Stores (+5.67% weekly)

Companies in the discount stores industry specialize in offering substantial discounts on a vast array of retail products. Some companies in this industry also operate general merchandise warehouse clubs. Products sold at discount stores are typically similar to those of any department store, but the pricing of the goods is generally much lower (and hence the name “discount”). Think Dollar General Corporation, Dollar Tree, Inc. and Five Below, Inc. Many discount stores target low-income households and/or price-sensitive consumers as their potential market. Discount stores’ profitability could hinge on factors like competitive pricing, sufficient locations, healthy revenue per square foot, and effective advertisement. These store operators could have an edge over other retailers during financial crises or recessions, when many consumers could be looking for less expensive alternatives.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COST($436B) has a higher market cap than OLLI($5.03B). COST has higher P/E ratio than OLLI: COST (49.41) vs OLLI (20.61). COST YTD gains are higher at: 14.238 vs. OLLI (-24.049). COST has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 14.5B vs. OLLI (394M). COST has more cash in the bank: 20B vs. OLLI (250M). OLLI has less debt than COST: OLLI (710M) vs COST (8.14B). COST has higher revenues than OLLI: COST (294B) vs OLLI (2.73B).
COSTOLLICOST / OLLI
Capitalization436B5.03B8,663%
EBITDA14.5B394M3,680%
Gain YTD14.238-24.049-59%
P/E Ratio49.4120.61240%
Revenue294B2.73B10,765%
Total Cash20B250M8,000%
Total Debt8.14B710M1,146%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
COST vs OLLI: Fundamental Ratings
COST
OLLI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8215
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
61
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1396
SMR RATING
1..100
3461
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5762
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6690
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OLLI's Valuation (61) in the Department Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for COST (100) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that OLLI’s stock grew somewhat faster than COST’s over the last 12 months.

COST's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the Specialty Stores industry is significantly better than the same rating for OLLI (96) in the Department Stores industry. This means that COST’s stock grew significantly faster than OLLI’s over the last 12 months.

COST's SMR Rating (34) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as OLLI (61) in the Department Stores industry. This means that COST’s stock grew similarly to OLLI’s over the last 12 months.

COST's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as OLLI (62) in the Department Stores industry. This means that COST’s stock grew similarly to OLLI’s over the last 12 months.

COST's P/E Growth Rating (66) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as OLLI (90) in the Department Stores industry. This means that COST’s stock grew similarly to OLLI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COSTOLLI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COST
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
OLLI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LAR9.640.64
+7.11%
Lithium Argentina AG
FWDI4.280.04
+0.94%
Forward Industries Inc.
CTHCX108.480.34
+0.31%
Columbia Global Technology Growth C
HQY88.34-0.62
-0.70%
HealthEquity
AIOS12.00-0.89
-6.90%
AIOS Tech Inc.

COST and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COST has been loosely correlated with WMT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if COST jumps, then WMT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COST
1D Price
Change %
COST100%
+0.68%
WMT - COST
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.45%
BJ - COST
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.12%
PSMT - COST
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.11%
TGT - COST
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.95%
OLLI - COST
15%
Poorly correlated
-0.48%
More