COST
Price
$935.03
Change
+$8.97 (+0.97%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
414.67B
60 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
OLLI
Price
$66.31
Change
+$1.07 (+1.64%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
4.01B
32 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

COST vs OLLI

COST vs OLLI Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
COST vs. OLLI commentary
Jul 26, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COST is a Buy and OLLI is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 26, 2026
Stock price -- (COST: $935.03 vs. OLLI: $66.31)
Brand notoriety: COST: Notable vs. OLLI: Not notable
Both companies represent the Discount Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COST: 41% vs. OLLI: 31%
Market capitalization -- COST: $414.67B vs. OLLI: $4.01B
COST [@Discount Stores] is valued at $414.67B. OLLI’s [@Discount Stores] market capitalization is $4.01B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Discount Stores] industry ranges from $871.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Discount Stores] industry is $158.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COST’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOLLI’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • COST’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • OLLI’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, COST is a better buy in the long-term than OLLI.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

COST’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OLLI’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • COST’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • OLLI’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, COST is a better buy in the short-term than OLLI.

Price Growth

COST (@Discount Stores) experienced а -0.46% price change this week, while OLLI (@Discount Stores) price change was -0.30% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Discount Stores industry was -2.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.39%.

Reported Earning Dates

COST is expected to report earnings on Sep 24, 2026.

OLLI is expected to report earnings on Aug 27, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Discount Stores (-2.19% weekly)

Companies in the discount stores industry specialize in offering substantial discounts on a vast array of retail products. Some companies in this industry also operate general merchandise warehouse clubs. Products sold at discount stores are typically similar to those of any department store, but the pricing of the goods is generally much lower (and hence the name “discount”). Think Dollar General Corporation, Dollar Tree, Inc. and Five Below, Inc. Many discount stores target low-income households and/or price-sensitive consumers as their potential market. Discount stores’ profitability could hinge on factors like competitive pricing, sufficient locations, healthy revenue per square foot, and effective advertisement. These store operators could have an edge over other retailers during financial crises or recessions, when many consumers could be looking for less expensive alternatives.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COST($415B) has a higher market cap than OLLI($4.01B). COST has higher P/E ratio than OLLI: COST (47.03) vs OLLI (16.41). COST YTD gains are higher at: 8.908 vs. OLLI (-39.504). COST has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 14.5B vs. OLLI (394M). OLLI has less debt than COST: OLLI (710M) vs COST (8.14B). COST has higher revenues than OLLI: COST (294B) vs OLLI (2.73B).
COSTOLLICOST / OLLI
Capitalization415B4.01B10,352%
EBITDA14.5B394M3,680%
Gain YTD8.908-39.504-23%
P/E Ratio47.0316.41287%
Revenue294B2.73B10,765%
Total CashN/A250M-
Total Debt8.14B710M1,146%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
COST vs OLLI: Fundamental Ratings
COST
OLLI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
99
Overvalued
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
16100
SMR RATING
1..100
3461
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5882
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6296
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OLLI's Valuation (59) in the Department Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for COST (99) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that OLLI’s stock grew somewhat faster than COST’s over the last 12 months.

COST's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Specialty Stores industry is significantly better than the same rating for OLLI (100) in the Department Stores industry. This means that COST’s stock grew significantly faster than OLLI’s over the last 12 months.

COST's SMR Rating (34) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as OLLI (61) in the Department Stores industry. This means that COST’s stock grew similarly to OLLI’s over the last 12 months.

COST's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as OLLI (82) in the Department Stores industry. This means that COST’s stock grew similarly to OLLI’s over the last 12 months.

COST's P/E Growth Rating (62) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OLLI (96) in the Department Stores industry. This means that COST’s stock grew somewhat faster than OLLI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COSTOLLI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COST
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
OLLI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
INDY43.44N/A
N/A
iShares India 50 ETF
QYLD18.28N/A
N/A
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
GEW54.98N/A
N/A
Cambria Global EW ETF
SPD40.85-0.01
-0.01%
Simplify US Equity PLUS Dwnsd Cnvxty ETF
TMAR25.10-0.29
-1.14%
FT Vest Emerging Mkts Buffr ETF - Mar

COST and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COST has been loosely correlated with WMT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if COST jumps, then WMT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COST
1D Price
Change %
COST100%
+1.13%
WMT - COST
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.99%
BJ - COST
48%
Loosely correlated
+1.81%
TGT - COST
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.71%
PSMT - COST
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.23%
DG - COST
19%
Poorly correlated
+1.80%
More

OLLI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OLLI and DLTR have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OLLI and DLTR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OLLI
1D Price
Change %
OLLI100%
+1.64%
DLTR - OLLI
27%
Poorly correlated
+2.38%
COST - OLLI
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.13%
PSMT - OLLI
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.23%
WMT - OLLI
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.99%
TGT - OLLI
12%
Poorly correlated
+1.71%
More