CXM
Price
$6.36
Change
+$0.16 (+2.58%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
1.49B
37 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
IBTA
Price
$24.00
Change
-$2.39 (-9.06%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
558.6M
Earnings call today
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CXM vs IBTA

CXM vs IBTA Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CXM vs. IBTA commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CXM is a Buy and IBTA is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (CXM: $6.36 vs. IBTA: $24.00)
Brand notoriety: CXM and IBTA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CXM: 87% vs. IBTA: 121%
Market capitalization -- CXM: $1.49B vs. IBTA: $558.6M
CXM [@Packaged Software] is valued at $1.49B. IBTA’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $558.6M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $400.93B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CXM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileIBTA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CXM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • IBTA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CXM is a better buy in the long-term than IBTA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CXM’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IBTA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CXM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • IBTA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CXM is a better buy in the short-term than IBTA.

Price Growth

CXM (@Packaged Software) experienced а +11.78% price change this week, while IBTA (@Packaged Software) price change was -8.57% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +3.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

CXM is expected to report earnings on Sep 09, 2026.

IBTA is expected to report earnings on Aug 03, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+3.35% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CXM($1.49B) has a higher market cap than IBTA($559M). IBTA has higher P/E ratio than CXM: IBTA (307.08) vs CXM (53.00). IBTA YTD gains are higher at: 5.587 vs. CXM (-18.252). CXM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 71.1M vs. IBTA (156K). CXM has more cash in the bank: 443M vs. IBTA (165M). IBTA has less debt than CXM: IBTA (25.3M) vs CXM (43.8M). CXM has higher revenues than IBTA: CXM (871M) vs IBTA (340M).
CXMIBTACXM / IBTA
Capitalization1.49B559M267%
EBITDA71.1M156K45,577%
Gain YTD-18.2525.587-327%
P/E Ratio53.00307.0817%
Revenue871M340M256%
Total Cash443M165M268%
Total Debt43.8M25.3M173%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CXMIBTA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CXM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
IBTA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SWLVX19.610.09
+0.46%
Schwab ® US Large-Cap Value Index
JNRFX90.85N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson Research D
QBNAX40.01-0.03
-0.07%
Pear Tree Polaris Small Cap Instl
FCVFX40.67-0.09
-0.22%
Fidelity Advisor Value C
BARAX85.26-0.89
-1.03%
Baron Asset Retail

CXM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CXM has been closely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CXM jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CXM
1D Price
Change %
CXM100%
+2.58%
FRSH - CXM
71%
Closely correlated
+0.84%
BL - CXM
68%
Closely correlated
+2.41%
ASAN - CXM
66%
Closely correlated
+4.65%
CRM - CXM
66%
Closely correlated
+1.83%
TEAM - CXM
66%
Loosely correlated
+2.95%
More

IBTA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IBTA has been loosely correlated with CXM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IBTA jumps, then CXM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IBTA
1D Price
Change %
IBTA100%
-9.06%
CXM - IBTA
35%
Loosely correlated
+2.58%
EGAN - IBTA
35%
Loosely correlated
+2.10%
VTSI - IBTA
33%
Loosely correlated
-2.22%
BRZE - IBTA
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.56%
SHOP - IBTA
32%
Poorly correlated
-4.29%
More