CXM
Price
$6.89
Change
-$0.14 (-1.99%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
1.61B
25 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RNG
Price
$64.49
Change
-$3.29 (-4.85%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
5.39B
86 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CXM vs RNG

CXM vs RNG Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CXM vs. RNG commentary
Aug 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CXM is a Buy and RNG is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 15, 2026
Stock price -- (CXM: $6.89 vs. RNG: $64.49)
Brand notoriety: CXM and RNG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CXM: 53% vs. RNG: 60%
Market capitalization -- CXM: $1.61B vs. RNG: $5.39B
CXM [@Packaged Software] is valued at $1.61B. RNG’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $5.39B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $233.34B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $10.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CXM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRNG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CXM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RNG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CXM is a better buy in the long-term than RNG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CXM’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RNG’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CXM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RNG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RNG is a better buy in the short-term than CXM.

Price Growth

CXM (@Packaged Software) experienced а +0.44% price change this week, while RNG (@Packaged Software) price change was +2.35% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -0.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.46%.

Reported Earning Dates

CXM is expected to report earnings on Sep 09, 2026.

RNG is expected to report earnings on Nov 09, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-0.33% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNG($5.39B) has a higher market cap than CXM($1.61B). CXM has higher P/E ratio than RNG: CXM (57.42) vs RNG (51.59). RNG YTD gains are higher at: 124.501 vs. CXM (-11.440). RNG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 409M vs. CXM (71.1M). CXM has more cash in the bank: 443M vs. RNG (106M). CXM has less debt than RNG: CXM (43.8M) vs RNG (1.17B). RNG has higher revenues than CXM: RNG (2.58B) vs CXM (871M).
CXMRNGCXM / RNG
Capitalization1.61B5.39B30%
EBITDA71.1M409M17%
Gain YTD-11.440124.501-9%
P/E Ratio57.4251.59111%
Revenue871M2.58B34%
Total Cash443M106M418%
Total Debt43.8M1.17B4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RNG: Fundamental Ratings
RNG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
45
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
34
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
98
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CXMRNG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CXM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RNG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BBRE108.680.09
+0.08%
JPMorgan BetaBuilders MSCI US REIT ETF
SPUT28.82-0.03
-0.09%
Innovator Eq Prm Inc -Daily PutWrite ETF
LCTD60.56-0.07
-0.11%
iShares Wld ex USCrbTrnstnRdnssAwrActETF
ITDB35.54-0.06
-0.17%
iShares LifePath Target Date 2030 ETF
FLAG28.77-0.12
-0.41%
Global X S&P 500 U.S. Market Leaders Top 50 ETF

CXM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CXM has been closely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CXM jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CXM
1D Price
Change %
CXM100%
-1.99%
FRSH - CXM
71%
Closely correlated
-0.16%
BL - CXM
68%
Closely correlated
-2.65%
CRM - CXM
67%
Closely correlated
-2.56%
ASAN - CXM
67%
Closely correlated
-7.40%
TEAM - CXM
66%
Loosely correlated
-2.27%
More