FDS
Price
$345.02
Change
+$0.59 (+0.17%)
Updated
Sep 16, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
13.02B
2 days until earnings call
HGBL
Price
$1.92
Change
+$0.02 (+1.05%)
Updated
Sep 16, 04:43 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
66.01M
51 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FDS vs HGBL

Header iconFDS vs HGBL Comparison
Open Charts FDS vs HGBLBanner chart's image
Factset Research Systems
Price$345.02
Change+$0.59 (+0.17%)
Volume$4.48K
Capitalization13.02B
Heritage Global
Price$1.92
Change+$0.02 (+1.05%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization66.01M
FDS vs HGBL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FDS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HGBL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FDS vs. HGBL commentary
Sep 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDS is a StrongBuy and HGBL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 17, 2025
Stock price -- (FDS: $345.19 vs. HGBL: $1.92)
Brand notoriety: FDS and HGBL are both not notable
FDS represents the Financial Publishing/Services, while HGBL is part of the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FDS: 152% vs. HGBL: 146%
Market capitalization -- FDS: $13.02B vs. HGBL: $66.01M
FDS [@Financial Publishing/Services] is valued at $13.02B. HGBL’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $66.01M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry ranges from $165.26B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry is $30.76B. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.61B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FDS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHGBL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FDS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HGBL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FDS is a better buy in the long-term than HGBL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FDS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HGBL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FDS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HGBL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HGBL is a better buy in the short-term than FDS.

Price Growth

FDS (@Financial Publishing/Services) experienced а -7.42% price change this week, while HGBL (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +1.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was -0.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.32%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +5.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was +57.98%.

Reported Earning Dates

FDS is expected to report earnings on Sep 18, 2025.

HGBL is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Publishing/Services (-0.09% weekly)

The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+5.12% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDS($13B) has a higher market cap than HGBL($66M). FDS has higher P/E ratio than HGBL: FDS (24.91) vs HGBL (19.20). HGBL YTD gains are higher at: 3.784 vs. FDS (-27.739). FDS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 888M vs. HGBL (10.2M). FDS has more cash in the bank: 28.9M vs. HGBL (19.8M). HGBL has less debt than FDS: HGBL (6.21M) vs FDS (1.62B). FDS has higher revenues than HGBL: FDS (2.29B) vs HGBL (48.9M).
FDSHGBLFDS / HGBL
Capitalization13B66M19,697%
EBITDA888M10.2M8,706%
Gain YTD-27.7393.784-733%
P/E Ratio24.9119.20130%
Revenue2.29B48.9M4,677%
Total Cash28.9M19.8M146%
Total Debt1.62B6.21M26,107%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FDS vs HGBL: Fundamental Ratings
FDS
HGBL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
460
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
57
Fair valued
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
99100
SMR RATING
1..100
3684
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6462
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
825
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5065

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FDS's Valuation (57) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as HGBL (83) in the null industry. This means that FDS’s stock grew similarly to HGBL’s over the last 12 months.

FDS's Profit vs Risk Rating (99) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as HGBL (100) in the null industry. This means that FDS’s stock grew similarly to HGBL’s over the last 12 months.

FDS's SMR Rating (36) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HGBL (84) in the null industry. This means that FDS’s stock grew somewhat faster than HGBL’s over the last 12 months.

HGBL's Price Growth Rating (62) in the null industry is in the same range as FDS (64) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that HGBL’s stock grew similarly to FDS’s over the last 12 months.

HGBL's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FDS (82) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that HGBL’s stock grew significantly faster than FDS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FDSHGBL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FDS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HGBL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PTA20.750.17
+0.83%
Cohen & Steers Tax-Advantaged Preferred Securities and Income Fund
SAGP34.180.01
+0.02%
Strategas Global Policy Opp ETF
DAGXF2.07N/A
N/A
Deutsche Bank AG (London Branch)
BGJTF9.92N/A
N/A
Baillie Gifford Japan Trust Plc. (The)
FLV73.50-0.44
-0.60%
American Century Foc Lrg Cp Val ETF

FDS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDS has been loosely correlated with MORN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FDS jumps, then MORN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FDS
1D Price
Change %
FDS100%
-4.81%
MORN - FDS
65%
Loosely correlated
-4.10%
MCO - FDS
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.69%
SPGI - FDS
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.04%
NDAQ - FDS
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.16%
MSCI - FDS
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.14%
More

HGBL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HGBL and MS have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HGBL and MS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HGBL
1D Price
Change %
HGBL100%
+1.05%
MS - HGBL
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.53%
GS - HGBL
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.16%
SF - HGBL
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.66%
LAZ - HGBL
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.33%
NMR - HGBL
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More