FDS
Price
$488.71
Change
+$5.19 (+1.07%)
Updated
Dec 23, 04:43 PM (EDT)
99 days until earnings call
NDAQ
Price
$77.94
Change
+$0.24 (+0.31%)
Updated
Dec 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
30 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FDS vs NDAQ

Header iconFDS vs NDAQ Comparison
Open Charts FDS vs NDAQBanner chart's image
Factset Research Systems
Price$488.71
Change+$5.19 (+1.07%)
Volume$500
CapitalizationN/A
Nasdaq
Price$77.94
Change+$0.24 (+0.31%)
Volume$17.65K
CapitalizationN/A
FDS vs NDAQ Comparison Chart
Loading...
FDS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NDAQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FDS vs. NDAQ commentary
Dec 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDS is a Hold and NDAQ is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 23, 2024
Stock price -- (FDS: $483.52 vs. NDAQ: $77.70)
Brand notoriety: FDS and NDAQ are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FDS: 335% vs. NDAQ: 280%
Market capitalization -- FDS: $16.87B vs. NDAQ: $36.33B
FDS [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $16.87B. NDAQ’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $36.33B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FDS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNDAQ’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FDS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NDAQ’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, NDAQ is a better buy in the long-term than FDS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FDS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NDAQ’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FDS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NDAQ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FDS is a better buy in the short-term than NDAQ.

Price Growth

FDS (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -1.07% price change this week, while NDAQ (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -3.02% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -4.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +28.80%.

Reported Earning Dates

FDS is expected to report earnings on Apr 01, 2025.

NDAQ is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-4.24% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NDAQ($36.3B) has a higher market cap than FDS($16.9B). FDS has higher P/E ratio than NDAQ: FDS (35.83) vs NDAQ (29.93). NDAQ YTD gains are higher at: 35.530 vs. FDS (2.304). NDAQ has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2B vs. FDS (805M). NDAQ has more cash in the bank: 641M vs. FDS (28.4M). FDS has less debt than NDAQ: FDS (1.77B) vs NDAQ (10.9B). NDAQ has higher revenues than FDS: NDAQ (6.06B) vs FDS (2.12B).
FDSNDAQFDS / NDAQ
Capitalization16.9B36.3B47%
EBITDA805M2B40%
Gain YTD2.30435.5306%
P/E Ratio35.8329.93120%
Revenue2.12B6.06B35%
Total Cash28.4M641M4%
Total Debt1.77B10.9B16%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FDS vs NDAQ: Fundamental Ratings
FDS
NDAQ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1612
SMR RATING
1..100
3166
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3744
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7013
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FDS's Valuation (94) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as NDAQ (97) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that FDS’s stock grew similarly to NDAQ’s over the last 12 months.

NDAQ's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as FDS (16) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that NDAQ’s stock grew similarly to FDS’s over the last 12 months.

FDS's SMR Rating (31) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NDAQ (66) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that FDS’s stock grew somewhat faster than NDAQ’s over the last 12 months.

FDS's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as NDAQ (44) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that FDS’s stock grew similarly to NDAQ’s over the last 12 months.

NDAQ's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FDS (70) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that NDAQ’s stock grew somewhat faster than FDS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FDSNDAQ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
36%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
43%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
45%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FDS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NDAQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UA7.780.22
+2.91%
Under Armour
TMCI6.960.06
+0.87%
Treace Medical Concepts
BEKE18.380.12
+0.66%
KE Holdings
HBIO2.110.01
+0.48%
Harvard Bioscience
IPA0.40-0.02
-4.76%
ImmunoPrecise Antibodies Ltd

FDS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDS has been loosely correlated with MORN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FDS jumps, then MORN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FDS
1D Price
Change %
FDS100%
-1.27%
MORN - FDS
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.70%
SPGI - FDS
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.08%
MSCI - FDS
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.70%
MCO - FDS
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.92%
NDAQ - FDS
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.41%
More

NDAQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NDAQ has been loosely correlated with MCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NDAQ jumps, then MCO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NDAQ
1D Price
Change %
NDAQ100%
+0.41%
MCO - NDAQ
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.92%
JEF - NDAQ
46%
Loosely correlated
+1.28%
SPGI - NDAQ
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.08%
ICE - NDAQ
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.36%
PIPR - NDAQ
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.75%
More