Advertisement
FDS vs NDAQ
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDS is a Hold and NDAQ is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FDS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNDAQ’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- FDS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- NDAQ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FDS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NDAQ’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FDS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- NDAQ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
FDS (@Financial Publishing/Services) experienced а -2.19% price change this week, while NDAQ (@Financial Publishing/Services) price change was -1.13% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was -2.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.44%.
Reported Earning Dates
FDS is expected to report earnings on Sep 18, 2025.
NDAQ is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Financial Publishing/Services (-2.58% weekly)The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.
| FDS | NDAQ | FDS / NDAQ | |
| Capitalization | 14B | 53.8B | 26% |
| EBITDA | 888M | 2.83B | 31% |
| Gain YTD | -22.207 | 22.075 | -101% |
| P/E Ratio | 26.75 | 36.07 | 74% |
| Revenue | 2.29B | 8.11B | 28% |
| Total Cash | 28.9M | 2.01B | 1% |
| Total Debt | 1.62B | 9.63B | 17% |
FDS | NDAQ | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 9 | 55 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 68 Overvalued | 63 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 79 | 16 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 36 | 58 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 72 | 66 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NDAQ's Valuation (63) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as FDS (68) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that NDAQ’s stock grew similarly to FDS’s over the last 12 months.
NDAQ's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FDS (79) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that NDAQ’s stock grew somewhat faster than FDS’s over the last 12 months.
FDS's SMR Rating (36) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as NDAQ (58) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that FDS’s stock grew similarly to NDAQ’s over the last 12 months.
NDAQ's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as FDS (64) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that NDAQ’s stock grew similarly to FDS’s over the last 12 months.
NDAQ's P/E Growth Rating (66) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as FDS (72) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that NDAQ’s stock grew similarly to FDS’s over the last 12 months.
| FDS | NDAQ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 54% | 1 day ago 54% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 49% | 1 day ago 41% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 42% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 49% | 1 day ago 44% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 49% | 1 day ago 50% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 57% | 25 days ago 67% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 48% | 3 days ago 46% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 64% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 63% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| AIQ | 44.88 | 0.26 | +0.58% |
| Global X Artfcl Intlgc & Tech ETF | |||
| MAMB | 23.43 | 0.12 | +0.53% |
| Monarch Ambassador Income ETF | |||
| BME | 36.87 | 0.12 | +0.33% |
| Blackrock Health Sciences Trust | |||
| EBUF | 27.83 | 0.02 | +0.07% |
| Innovator Emerging Markets 10 Buf ETF-Qt | |||
| COWS | 31.57 | -0.13 | -0.41% |
| Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF | |||
FDS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDS has been loosely correlated with MORN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FDS jumps, then MORN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDS | 100% | +0.52% | ||
| MORN - FDS | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.12% | ||
| MCO - FDS | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.41% | ||
| SPGI - FDS | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.07% | ||
| NDAQ - FDS | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.19% | ||
| MSCI - FDS | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.42% | ||
More | ||||
NDAQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NDAQ has been closely correlated with MCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NDAQ jumps, then MCO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NDAQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NDAQ | 100% | +0.19% | ||
| MCO - NDAQ | 78% Closely correlated | -0.41% | ||
| JEF - NDAQ | 71% Closely correlated | -0.47% | ||
| MS - NDAQ | 71% Closely correlated | -0.21% | ||
| GS - NDAQ | 70% Closely correlated | -0.04% | ||
| RJF - NDAQ | 69% Closely correlated | -1.05% | ||
More | ||||