FDS
Price
$425.39
Change
+$1.43 (+0.34%)
Updated
Apr 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
16.87B
57 days until earnings call
NDAQ
Price
$73.50
Change
+$0.81 (+1.11%)
Updated
Apr 23 closing price
Capitalization
36.33B
Earnings call today
Ad is loading...

FDS vs NDAQ

Header iconFDS vs NDAQ Comparison
Open Charts FDS vs NDAQBanner chart's image
Factset Research Systems
Price$425.39
Change+$1.43 (+0.34%)
Volume$100
Capitalization16.87B
Nasdaq
Price$73.50
Change+$0.81 (+1.11%)
Volume$3.5M
Capitalization36.33B
FDS vs NDAQ Comparison Chart
Loading...
FDS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NDAQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FDS vs. NDAQ commentary
Apr 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDS is a StrongBuy and NDAQ is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 24, 2025
Stock price -- (FDS: $425.52 vs. NDAQ: $73.50)
Brand notoriety: FDS and NDAQ are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FDS: 83% vs. NDAQ: 107%
Market capitalization -- FDS: $16.87B vs. NDAQ: $36.33B
FDS [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $16.87B. NDAQ’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $36.33B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FDS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNDAQ’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FDS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NDAQ’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FDS is a better buy in the long-term than NDAQ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FDS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NDAQ’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FDS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NDAQ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FDS is a better buy in the short-term than NDAQ.

Price Growth

FDS (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -0.40% price change this week, while NDAQ (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +2.52% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +4.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +133.54%.

Reported Earning Dates

FDS is expected to report earnings on Jun 20, 2025.

NDAQ is expected to report earnings on Jul 16, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+4.09% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NDAQ($36.3B) has a higher market cap than FDS($16.9B). FDS has higher P/E ratio than NDAQ: FDS (35.83) vs NDAQ (29.93). NDAQ YTD gains are higher at: -4.611 vs. FDS (-11.524). NDAQ has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2B vs. FDS (805M). NDAQ has more cash in the bank: 641M vs. FDS (28.4M). FDS has less debt than NDAQ: FDS (1.77B) vs NDAQ (10.9B). NDAQ has higher revenues than FDS: NDAQ (6.06B) vs FDS (2.12B).
FDSNDAQFDS / NDAQ
Capitalization16.9B36.3B47%
EBITDA805M2B40%
Gain YTD-11.524-4.611250%
P/E Ratio35.8329.93120%
Revenue2.12B6.06B35%
Total Cash28.4M641M4%
Total Debt1.77B10.9B16%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FDS vs NDAQ: Fundamental Ratings
FDS
NDAQ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1618
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2715
SMR RATING
1..100
3468
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5854
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6119
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NDAQ's Valuation (88) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as FDS (92) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that NDAQ’s stock grew similarly to FDS’s over the last 12 months.

NDAQ's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as FDS (27) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that NDAQ’s stock grew similarly to FDS’s over the last 12 months.

FDS's SMR Rating (34) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NDAQ (68) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that FDS’s stock grew somewhat faster than NDAQ’s over the last 12 months.

NDAQ's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as FDS (58) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that NDAQ’s stock grew similarly to FDS’s over the last 12 months.

NDAQ's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FDS (61) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that NDAQ’s stock grew somewhat faster than FDS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FDSNDAQ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
45%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FDS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NDAQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
INDV9.450.64
+7.26%
Indivior PLC
KRUS61.292.39
+4.06%
Kura Sushi USA
CARV1.350.03
+2.58%
Carver Bancorp
FWONA78.221.77
+2.32%
Liberty Media Corp
TAYD30.39-0.20
-0.65%
Taylor Devices

FDS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDS has been closely correlated with MORN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FDS jumps, then MORN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FDS
1D Price
Change %
FDS100%
+2.65%
MORN - FDS
66%
Closely correlated
+2.65%
MCO - FDS
61%
Loosely correlated
+4.01%
NDAQ - FDS
60%
Loosely correlated
+2.87%
SPGI - FDS
59%
Loosely correlated
+3.88%
MSCI - FDS
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.94%
More