FDS
Price
$301.05
Change
-$34.99 (-10.41%)
Updated
Sep 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
11.39B
Earnings call today
NDAQ
Price
$88.87
Change
-$4.23 (-4.54%)
Updated
Sep 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
50.99B
26 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FDS vs NDAQ

Header iconFDS vs NDAQ Comparison
Open Charts FDS vs NDAQBanner chart's image
Factset Research Systems
Price$301.05
Change-$34.99 (-10.41%)
Volume$16.92K
Capitalization11.39B
Nasdaq
Price$88.87
Change-$4.23 (-4.54%)
Volume$136.89K
Capitalization50.99B
FDS vs NDAQ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FDS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NDAQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FDS vs. NDAQ commentary
Sep 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDS is a Hold and NDAQ is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 19, 2025
Stock price -- (FDS: $336.04 vs. NDAQ: $93.10)
Brand notoriety: FDS and NDAQ are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Publishing/Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FDS: 247% vs. NDAQ: 96%
Market capitalization -- FDS: $13.05B vs. NDAQ: $53.1B
FDS [@Financial Publishing/Services] is valued at $13.05B. NDAQ’s [@Financial Publishing/Services] market capitalization is $53.1B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry ranges from $165.26B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry is $30.67B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FDS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNDAQ’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FDS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NDAQ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NDAQ is a better buy in the long-term than FDS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FDS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NDAQ’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FDS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NDAQ’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FDS is a better buy in the short-term than NDAQ.

Price Growth

FDS (@Financial Publishing/Services) experienced а -7.11% price change this week, while NDAQ (@Financial Publishing/Services) price change was -1.37% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was -0.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.50%.

Reported Earning Dates

FDS is expected to report earnings on Sep 18, 2025.

NDAQ is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Publishing/Services (-0.81% weekly)

The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NDAQ($51B) has a higher market cap than FDS($11.4B). NDAQ has higher P/E ratio than FDS: NDAQ (34.18) vs FDS (19.37). NDAQ YTD gains are higher at: 16.022 vs. FDS (-36.803). NDAQ has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.83B vs. FDS (888M). FDS has less debt than NDAQ: FDS (1.62B) vs NDAQ (9.63B). NDAQ has higher revenues than FDS: NDAQ (8.11B) vs FDS (2.29B).
FDSNDAQFDS / NDAQ
Capitalization11.4B51B22%
EBITDA888M2.83B31%
Gain YTD-36.80316.022-230%
P/E Ratio19.3734.1857%
Revenue2.29B8.11B28%
Total Cash28.9MN/A-
Total Debt1.62B9.63B17%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FDS vs NDAQ: Fundamental Ratings
FDS
NDAQ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6556
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
53
Fair valued
60
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10016
SMR RATING
1..100
3658
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6449
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8367
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FDS's Valuation (53) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as NDAQ (60) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that FDS’s stock grew similarly to NDAQ’s over the last 12 months.

NDAQ's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is significantly better than the same rating for FDS (100) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that NDAQ’s stock grew significantly faster than FDS’s over the last 12 months.

FDS's SMR Rating (36) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as NDAQ (58) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that FDS’s stock grew similarly to NDAQ’s over the last 12 months.

NDAQ's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as FDS (64) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that NDAQ’s stock grew similarly to FDS’s over the last 12 months.

NDAQ's P/E Growth Rating (67) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as FDS (83) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that NDAQ’s stock grew similarly to FDS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FDSNDAQ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
31%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FDS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NDAQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ISCV67.580.98
+1.47%
iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Value ETF
OBTC35.300.41
+1.17%
Osprey Bitcoin Trust
COWS32.230.28
+0.88%
Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF
SCHC45.520.08
+0.18%
Schwab International Small-Cap Eq ETF™
TRPA39.04N/A
-0.01%
Hartford AAA CLO ETF

FDS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDS has been closely correlated with MORN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FDS jumps, then MORN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FDS
1D Price
Change %
FDS100%
-10.36%
MORN - FDS
67%
Closely correlated
-6.11%
MCO - FDS
62%
Loosely correlated
-5.75%
SPGI - FDS
60%
Loosely correlated
-6.67%
NDAQ - FDS
58%
Loosely correlated
-4.54%
MSCI - FDS
57%
Loosely correlated
-3.92%
More

NDAQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NDAQ has been closely correlated with MCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NDAQ jumps, then MCO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NDAQ
1D Price
Change %
NDAQ100%
-4.54%
MCO - NDAQ
78%
Closely correlated
-5.75%
JEF - NDAQ
71%
Closely correlated
+5.76%
MS - NDAQ
71%
Closely correlated
+1.16%
GS - NDAQ
70%
Closely correlated
+1.27%
SPGI - NDAQ
70%
Closely correlated
-6.67%
More