FDS vs TPR
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDS is a StrongBuy and TPR is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FDS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTPR’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- FDS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- TPR’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FDS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TPR’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FDS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- TPR’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
FDS (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -0.40% price change this week, while TPR (@Other Consumer Specialties) price change was +5.90% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +4.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +136.28%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Specialties industry was +1.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -10.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.42%.
Reported Earning Dates
FDS is expected to report earnings on Jun 20, 2025.
TPR is expected to report earnings on Aug 14, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Banks/Brokers (+4.59% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
@Other Consumer Specialties (+1.04% weekly)‘Other Consumer Specialties’ represents an industry that typically sells durable consumer products, but do not have a classification in another category. The products include jewelry, smoke detectors, watches, collectibles and safety products. MSA Safety (makes products which enhances the safety and health of workers and protect facility infrastructures), Matthews International (memorialization business), Fitbit (makes wireless-enabled wearable technology devices that gauge data such as the number of steps walked, heart rate, quality of sleep), and Fossil Group (makes watches and accessories) have some of the largest market caps in this group.
| FDS | TPR | FDS / TPR | |
| Capitalization | 16.9B | 10.9B | 155% |
| EBITDA | 805M | 1.39B | 58% |
| Gain YTD | -11.199 | 2.354 | -476% |
| P/E Ratio | 35.83 | 12.12 | 296% |
| Revenue | 2.12B | 6.73B | 32% |
| Total Cash | 28.4M | 7.46B | 0% |
| Total Debt | 1.77B | 9.34B | 19% |
FDS | TPR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 14 | 15 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 92 Overvalued | 41 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 27 | 16 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 34 | 25 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | 43 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | 8 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TPR's Valuation (41) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FDS (92) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that TPR’s stock grew somewhat faster than FDS’s over the last 12 months.
TPR's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry is in the same range as FDS (27) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that TPR’s stock grew similarly to FDS’s over the last 12 months.
TPR's SMR Rating (25) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry is in the same range as FDS (34) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that TPR’s stock grew similarly to FDS’s over the last 12 months.
TPR's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry is in the same range as FDS (57) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that TPR’s stock grew similarly to FDS’s over the last 12 months.
TPR's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FDS (54) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that TPR’s stock grew somewhat faster than FDS’s over the last 12 months.
| FDS | TPR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 48% | 14 days ago 68% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 69% |
FDS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDS has been closely correlated with MORN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FDS jumps, then MORN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDS | 100% | +0.37% | ||
| MORN - FDS | 66% Closely correlated | +0.63% | ||
| MCO - FDS | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.21% | ||
| NDAQ - FDS | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.11% | ||
| SPGI - FDS | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.82% | ||
| MSCI - FDS | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.94% | ||
More | ||||
TPR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TPR has been loosely correlated with MOV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TPR jumps, then MOV could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TPR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TPR | 100% | +2.56% | ||
| MOV - TPR | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.65% | ||
| LVMHF - TPR | 41% Loosely correlated | +2.36% | ||
| LVMUY - TPR | 40% Loosely correlated | +1.87% | ||
| PPRUY - TPR | 39% Loosely correlated | -2.31% | ||
| CFRUY - TPR | 37% Loosely correlated | +0.52% | ||
More | ||||