Advertisement
FR vs FRT
Which Stock Would AI Choose? First Industrial Realty Trust (FR) vs. Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Both FR and FRT are real estate investment trusts (REITs), but FR focuses on industrial logistics while FRT specializes in retail properties.
- In recent market activity, FRT has shown stronger momentum with approximately 9% gains over the past month compared to FR's 5% rise.
- FR benefits from e-commerce-driven demand for logistics space amid an activist investor push for change.
- FRT demonstrates resilience in high-quality retail locations, with year-to-date returns around 14% versus FR's 9%.
- Interest rate sensitivity impacts both, but FRT's recent analyst upgrades signal positive sentiment.
Introduction
This stock comparison examines FR and FRT, two prominent REITs operating in distinct real estate niches: industrial logistics versus upscale retail. Investors seeking exposure to commercial property sectors may find value in understanding their relative performance amid evolving market dynamics, including e-commerce growth and consumer spending trends. Traders focused on momentum and sector rotation will appreciate insights into recent price behavior, sentiment drivers, and head-to-head metrics. This analysis draws on data from sources like Yahoo Finance and TradingView to highlight contrasts in a neutral, fact-based manner, aiding informed decision-making in the current environment.
FR Overview and Recent Performance
First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. (FR) is a leading owner, operator, developer, and acquirer of logistics properties across the U.S. The company caters to the booming demand for industrial space driven by e-commerce and supply chain needs. In recent weeks, FR shares have climbed around 5% over the past month, reflecting steady gains amid broader REIT sector recovery. Year-to-date performance stands at approximately 9%, supported by solid occupancy and development pipelines. Sentiment has been influenced by an activist campaign from Land & Buildings, launched in late 2025, which prompted announcements like a $250 million initiative, fostering optimism for potential strategic enhancements. Trading near $63, the stock exhibits moderate volatility tied to interest rate expectations.
FRT Overview and Recent Performance
Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) owns and operates high-quality retail properties, primarily shopping centers in affluent U.S. markets. Its portfolio emphasizes resilient, open-air centers with strong tenant mixes. Recent market activity has favored FRT, with shares advancing about 9% in the past 30 days and 14% year-to-date, outperforming many retail REIT peers. This momentum follows a Zacks Rank upgrade to Buy in March, driven by expectations for funds from operations (FFO) growth ahead of Q1 earnings. Trading around $111, close to its 52-week high, FRT benefits from robust comparable property growth projections of 3-3.5% for 2026, bolstering investor confidence despite rate pressures.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, curated from hundreds available for copy trading across thousands of tickers. With 351 total AI robots employing diverse strategies—from short-term signal agents to virtual agents with risk management and brokerage-integrated options—only 25 make the trending list based on AI analysis of current market conditions. These bots operate on timeframes like 5-minute, 15-minute, and 60-minute intervals, offering real-time signals with no minimum balance requirements. This selection highlights bots suited to volatile sectors like REITs, providing traders tools for momentum plays or stability. Explore the Trending AI Robots to identify strategies aligning with your risk profile and market outlook.
Head-to-Head Comparison
FR and FRT diverge in business models: FR's industrial focus leverages e-commerce tailwinds, while FRT's retail emphasis relies on consumer resilience in premium locations. Growth drivers for FR include development projects and activist-driven efficiencies; FRT boasts higher comparable NOI (net operating income) growth potential. Recent momentum favors FRT with superior 1-month and YTD returns, though FR offers value at a lower price point. Risk factors are similar—rate sensitivity—but retail faces tenant churn risks versus industrial's steadier demand. Sector exposure positions FR for supply chain booms and FRT for spending recoveries, with market sentiment tilting toward FRT's stability.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI tools currently lean toward FRT due to its consistent recent momentum, stronger relative performance, and upcoming catalysts like earnings growth projections. While FR shows promise from industrial trends and activism, FRT's positioning offers higher probability of near-term outperformance in the prevailing rate environment.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FR is a Hold and FRT is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFRT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- FR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- FRT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FRT’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- FRT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
FR (@Miscellaneous Manufacturing) experienced а -1.58% price change this week, while FRT (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was -3.47% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry was -2.82%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.85%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was -1.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.90%.
Reported Earning Dates
FR is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2026.
FRT is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Miscellaneous Manufacturing (-2.82% weekly)Miscellaneous manufacturing refers to a diverse range of products that cannot readily be categorized into other specific sectors of manufacturing. Major U.S. players in this industry include AMETEK, Inc.( analytical instruments, precision components and specialty materials), Dover Corporation (solutions for efficiency and safety of extracting oil and gas, e.g. rod lifts, progressing cavity pumps, gas lifts etc.; solutions for the transportation/transformation of solid waste; products for safe handling of critical fluids for various industries; systems for commercial-refrigeration, heating and cooling, and food and beverage packaging), and Carlisle Companies Incorporated (niche markets including commercial roofing, energy, lawn and garden, mining and construction equipment, aerospace and electronics, dining and food delivery, and healthcare), among others.
@Real Estate Investment Trusts (-1.95% weekly)A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.
| FR | FRT | FR / FRT | |
| Capitalization | 8.19B | 10.4B | 79% |
| EBITDA | 633M | 1.09B | 58% |
| Gain YTD | 8.860 | 22.087 | 40% |
| P/E Ratio | 23.86 | 20.86 | 114% |
| Revenue | 745M | 1.31B | 57% |
| Total Cash | 37.1M | 116M | 32% |
| Total Debt | 2.58B | 4.93B | 52% |
FR | FRT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 74 | 71 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 14 Undervalued | 63 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 53 | 59 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 64 | 54 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | 22 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 55 | 76 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FR's Valuation (14) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRT (63). This means that FR’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRT’s over the last 12 months.
FR's Profit vs Risk Rating (53) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as FRT (59). This means that FR’s stock grew similarly to FRT’s over the last 12 months.
FRT's SMR Rating (54) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as FR (64). This means that FRT’s stock grew similarly to FR’s over the last 12 months.
FRT's Price Growth Rating (22) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as FR (49). This means that FRT’s stock grew similarly to FR’s over the last 12 months.
FR's P/E Growth Rating (55) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as FRT (76). This means that FR’s stock grew similarly to FRT’s over the last 12 months.
| FR | FRT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 55% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 48% | 3 days ago 51% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 50% | 3 days ago 47% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 44% | 3 days ago 49% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 42% | 3 days ago 46% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 50% | 3 days ago 48% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 51% | 9 days ago 50% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 46% | 3 days ago 49% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 50% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 32% | 3 days ago 41% |
Advertisement
FR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FR has been closely correlated with EGP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FR jumps, then EGP could also see price increases.
FRT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRT has been closely correlated with AKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FRT jumps, then AKR could also see price increases.