Advertisement
FRSH vs HUBS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRSH is a Hold and HUBS is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FRSH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHUBS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- FRSH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- HUBS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FRSH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HUBS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FRSH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 7 bearish.
- HUBS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
FRSH (@Packaged Software) experienced а -10.64% price change this week, while HUBS (@Packaged Software) price change was -10.93% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -5.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.53%.
Reported Earning Dates
FRSH is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.
HUBS is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-5.14% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| FRSH | HUBS | FRSH / HUBS | |
| Capitalization | 5.43B | 32.3B | 17% |
| EBITDA | -158.03M | -81.23M | 195% |
| Gain YTD | -21.583 | -28.454 | 76% |
| P/E Ratio | 1.54 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 596M | 2.17B | 27% |
| Total Cash | 1.19B | 1.39B | 86% |
| Total Debt | 29.5M | 788M | 4% |
FRSH | HUBS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 62 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 50 Fair valued | 100 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 81 | 66 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | 89 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | 64 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 21 | 78 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FRSH's Valuation (50) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HUBS (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that FRSH’s stock grew somewhat faster than HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
HUBS's Profit vs Risk Rating (66) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as FRSH (81) in the Restaurants industry. This means that HUBS’s stock grew similarly to FRSH’s over the last 12 months.
HUBS's SMR Rating (89) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as FRSH (91) in the Restaurants industry. This means that HUBS’s stock grew similarly to FRSH’s over the last 12 months.
HUBS's Price Growth Rating (64) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as FRSH (64) in the Restaurants industry. This means that HUBS’s stock grew similarly to FRSH’s over the last 12 months.
FRSH's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HUBS (78) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that FRSH’s stock grew somewhat faster than HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
| FRSH | HUBS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 68% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 70% | 11 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 68% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 78% |
Advertisement
FRSH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRSH has been loosely correlated with QTWO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FRSH jumps, then QTWO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FRSH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FRSH | 100% | -2.39% | ||
| QTWO - FRSH | 65% Loosely correlated | -5.75% | ||
| HUBS - FRSH | 65% Loosely correlated | -4.07% | ||
| CNNE - FRSH | 64% Loosely correlated | -3.13% | ||
| COIN - FRSH | 64% Loosely correlated | -16.70% | ||
| CLSK - FRSH | 63% Loosely correlated | -8.18% | ||
More | ||||
HUBS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUBS has been closely correlated with CRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HUBS jumps, then CRM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HUBS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HUBS | 100% | -4.07% | ||
| CRM - HUBS | 72% Closely correlated | -2.94% | ||
| TEAM - HUBS | 67% Closely correlated | -4.60% | ||
| NOW - HUBS | 66% Closely correlated | -3.05% | ||
| S - HUBS | 66% Loosely correlated | -2.18% | ||
| SHOP - HUBS | 65% Loosely correlated | -2.95% | ||
More | ||||