Ad is loading...
FRT
Price
$114.40
Change
+$1.25 (+1.10%)
Updated
Nov 21 closing price
87 days until earnings call
KIM
Price
$25.31
Change
+$0.22 (+0.88%)
Updated
Nov 21 closing price
76 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FRT vs KIM

Header iconFRT vs KIM Comparison
Open Charts FRT vs KIMBanner chart's image
Federal Realty Investment Trust
Price$114.40
Change+$1.25 (+1.10%)
Volume$463.38K
CapitalizationN/A
Kimco Realty
Price$25.31
Change+$0.22 (+0.88%)
Volume$3.8M
CapitalizationN/A
FRT vs KIM Comparison Chart
Loading...
FRT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
KIM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRT vs. KIM commentary
Nov 22, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRT is a Buy and KIM is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 22, 2024
Stock price -- (FRT: $114.40 vs. KIM: $25.31)
Brand notoriety: FRT and KIM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRT: 65% vs. KIM: 90%
Market capitalization -- FRT: $8.36B vs. KIM: $13.22B
FRT [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $8.36B. KIM’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $13.22B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileKIM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FRT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • KIM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, KIM is a better buy in the long-term than FRT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRT’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KIM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRT’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • KIM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FRT is a better buy in the short-term than KIM.

Price Growth

FRT (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а +0.91% price change this week, while KIM (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was +2.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +1.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.44%.

Reported Earning Dates

FRT is expected to report earnings on Feb 17, 2025.

KIM is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+1.53% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KIM($13.2B) has a higher market cap than FRT($8.36B). FRT has higher P/E ratio than KIM: FRT (35.98) vs KIM (18.72). KIM YTD gains are higher at: 23.016 vs. FRT (14.524). KIM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.4B vs. FRT (737M). KIM has more cash in the bank: 1.11B vs. FRT (251M). FRT has less debt than KIM: FRT (4.69B) vs KIM (7.73B). KIM has higher revenues than FRT: KIM (1.78B) vs FRT (1.13B).
FRTKIMFRT / KIM
Capitalization8.36B13.2B63%
EBITDA737M1.4B53%
Gain YTD14.52423.01663%
P/E Ratio35.9818.72192%
Revenue1.13B1.78B63%
Total Cash251M1.11B23%
Total Debt4.69B7.73B61%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRT vs KIM: Fundamental Ratings
FRT
KIM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1312
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
99
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10051
SMR RATING
1..100
6984
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4818
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4017
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a25

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FRT's Valuation (77) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as KIM (99). This means that FRT’s stock grew similarly to KIM’s over the last 12 months.

KIM's Profit vs Risk Rating (51) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRT (100). This means that KIM’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRT’s over the last 12 months.

FRT's SMR Rating (69) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as KIM (84). This means that FRT’s stock grew similarly to KIM’s over the last 12 months.

KIM's Price Growth Rating (18) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as FRT (48). This means that KIM’s stock grew similarly to FRT’s over the last 12 months.

KIM's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as FRT (40). This means that KIM’s stock grew similarly to FRT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRTKIM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 29 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FRT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
KIM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DFJ75.340.56
+0.74%
WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend ETF
FMAY47.460.21
+0.44%
FT Cboe Vest US Equity Buffer ETF May
BBJP55.890.17
+0.31%
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF
ESGY56.91N/A
N/A
American Century Sustainable Growth ETF
TPLE26.74N/A
N/A
Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cp Cr Enh ETF

FRT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRT has been closely correlated with REG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FRT jumps, then REG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRT
1D Price
Change %
FRT100%
+1.10%
REG - FRT
85%
Closely correlated
-0.09%
KIM - FRT
83%
Closely correlated
+0.88%
KRG - FRT
82%
Closely correlated
+0.11%
BRX - FRT
81%
Closely correlated
+0.34%
UE - FRT
77%
Closely correlated
-0.17%
More

KIM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KIM has been closely correlated with FRT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KIM jumps, then FRT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KIM
1D Price
Change %
KIM100%
+0.88%
FRT - KIM
82%
Closely correlated
+1.10%
BRX - KIM
82%
Closely correlated
+0.34%
REG - KIM
81%
Closely correlated
-0.09%
UE - KIM
80%
Closely correlated
-0.17%
KRG - KIM
79%
Closely correlated
+0.11%
More