Advertisement
GD vs NOC
Which Stock Would AI Choose? General Dynamics (GD) vs. Northrop Grumman (NOC) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- General Dynamics (GD) demonstrates stronger recent revenue growth at 10.6% quarterly compared to Northrop Grumman (NOC)'s 4.4%, supporting stable performance amid sector volatility.
- NOC trades at a lower P/E ratio (price-to-earnings, 18.40) than GD (20.53), offering potential value, but has declined 14% over recent weeks.
- Both stocks benefit from robust defense backlogs—GD at $118 billion—amid rising geopolitical tensions and sustained U.S. spending.
- Year-to-date, GD is up 5.02% versus NOC's 3.31%, reflecting GD's relative resilience in recent market activity.
- Market caps are similar around $84-85 billion, with both exposed to aerospace and defense but differing in diversification.
Introduction
General Dynamics (GD) and Northrop Grumman (NOC) are leading U.S. defense contractors, pivotal in aerospace, marine systems, and mission-critical technologies. This comparison analyzes their recent market positioning, performance, and sector dynamics, aiding investors and traders focused on the defense industry. Amid geopolitical uncertainties and steady government contracts, understanding relative strengths in revenue growth, valuation, and momentum helps assess opportunities in this resilient sector.
GD Overview and Recent Performance
General Dynamics Corporation (GD) is a diversified aerospace and defense firm with segments in business aviation (Gulfstream jets), marine systems (submarines and ships), combat vehicles, and information technology. In recent market activity, GD shares have traded around $316, within a 52-week range of $267 to $370, with a market cap of approximately $86 billion. The stock experienced a 6.9% weekly pullback but maintains a year-to-date gain of 5% and 19% over one year, buoyed by Q4 2025 revenue of $14.4 billion (up 7.8% year-over-year) and a record $118 billion backlog. Sentiment remains supported by strong defense demand, though broader sector rotations have pressured prices in recent weeks.
NOC Overview and Recent Performance
Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC) specializes in advanced aircraft, space systems, cyber solutions, and missile defense through aeronautics, space, and mission systems divisions. Shares recently hover near $587, in a 52-week band of $453 to $774, with a market cap of about $83 billion. Despite Q1 2026 revenue rising 4.4% to $9.9 billion, the stock fell 13-14% in recent weeks post-earnings, amid cautious guidance and sector headwinds, though year-to-date it holds a 3.3% gain and 26% one-year return. A $95.7 billion backlog underpins long-term visibility, but valuation concerns have influenced near-term sentiment.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron offers over 350 AI trading bots that analyze thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and styles—from trend-following with fundamental analysis to volatility-focused agents using take-profit/stop-loss exits. Only the top 25 performers, curated for current market conditions, appear on the Trending AI Robots page. These showcase impressive stats, including annualized returns from +15% to +168%, win rates of 48% to 88%, and profit factors up to 11.7, with average trade durations from 1 day to 55 days and drawdowns managed effectively. Covering sectors like aerospace, semiconductors, and energy, they provide real-time signals and customizable risk management. Traders can explore these high-potential bots to enhance strategies amid volatile defense markets.
Head-to-Head Comparison
GD and NOC both thrive on U.S. defense budgets but differ in focus: GD's marine and combat systems offer diversification beyond aviation, while NOC leads in space and hypersonics. Growth drivers favor GD with 10-11% recent revenue expansion versus NOC's flatter trajectory. Momentum tilts to GD amid its milder pullback, though NOC's lower P/E suggests value if sentiment rebounds. Risks include budget delays and sector rotations; both enjoy positive exposure to European rearmament and missile demand, with comparable backlogs signaling multi-year revenue stability.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward GD for its superior trend consistency, revenue momentum, and resilience in recent volatility. With a strong backlog and diversified growth drivers, GD shows higher probability of outperformance versus NOC's post-earnings pressures, though both remain attractive in a defense-favorable environment.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GD is a StrongBuy and NOC is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GD’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNOC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- GD’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- NOC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GD’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NOC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GD’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
- NOC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
GD (@Aerospace & Defense) experienced а +3.98% price change this week, while NOC (@Aerospace & Defense) price change was +1.09% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Aerospace & Defense industry was -1.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.36%.
Reported Earning Dates
GD is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
NOC is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Aerospace & Defense (-1.16% weekly)Aerospace & Defense is one of largest industries in the U.S., mainly comprising the following areas: commercial airliners, military aircraft, missiles, space, and general aviation. Focused heavily on research & development, it is also one of the fastest growing industries. Military aircraft has the largest market share in the industry’s sales, followed by space systems, civil aircraft, and missiles. Aerospace exports, directly and indirectly, support more jobs than the export of any other commodity, according to a study by the U.S. Department of Commerce. Boeing Company, Lockheed Martin Corporation and General Electric Company are some of the most prominent players in this space.
| GD | NOC | GD / NOC | |
| Capitalization | 97.4B | 78.2B | 125% |
| EBITDA | 6.59B | 7.7B | 86% |
| Gain YTD | 7.934 | -2.751 | -288% |
| P/E Ratio | 22.67 | 17.25 | 131% |
| Revenue | 53.8B | 42.4B | 127% |
| Total Cash | 3.65B | 2.09B | 175% |
| Total Debt | 9.83B | 16.3B | 60% |
GD | NOC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 16 | 10 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 45 Fair valued | 53 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 14 | 53 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 49 | 34 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 29 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 69 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GD's Valuation (45) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is in the same range as NOC (53). This means that GD’s stock grew similarly to NOC’s over the last 12 months.
GD's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NOC (53). This means that GD’s stock grew somewhat faster than NOC’s over the last 12 months.
NOC's SMR Rating (34) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is in the same range as GD (49). This means that NOC’s stock grew similarly to GD’s over the last 12 months.
GD's Price Growth Rating (29) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is in the same range as NOC (60). This means that GD’s stock grew similarly to NOC’s over the last 12 months.
GD's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NOC (69). This means that GD’s stock grew somewhat faster than NOC’s over the last 12 months.
| GD | NOC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 64% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 50% | 3 days ago 51% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 51% | 3 days ago 51% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 49% | 3 days ago 52% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 46% | 3 days ago 57% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 48% | 3 days ago 36% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 43% | 17 days ago 60% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 36% | 7 days ago 47% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 33% | 3 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 32% |
Advertisement
GD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GD has been loosely correlated with LHX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GD jumps, then LHX could also see price increases.
NOC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NOC has been loosely correlated with LHX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NOC jumps, then LHX could also see price increases.