Advertisement
HUBS vs TAOP
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HUBS is a Hold and TAOP is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HUBS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTAOP’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- HUBS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- TAOP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HUBS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TAOP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HUBS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- TAOP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
HUBS (@Packaged Software) experienced а -8.32% price change this week, while TAOP (@Computer Communications) price change was -12.80% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -5.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was +46.41%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -6.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -11.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +28.89%.
Reported Earning Dates
HUBS is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-5.51% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
@Computer Communications (-6.62% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
| HUBS | TAOP | HUBS / TAOP | |
| Capitalization | 19B | 2.72M | 698,786% |
| EBITDA | 126M | 773K | 16,300% |
| Gain YTD | -48.060 | -84.168 | 57% |
| P/E Ratio | 7023.44 | 0.20 | 3,511,722% |
| Revenue | 2.85B | 36.7M | 7,760% |
| Total Cash | 1.67B | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 281M | 8.3M | 3,385% |
HUBS | TAOP | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 61 | 83 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 100 Overvalued | 37 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 92 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 87 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 87 | 92 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 71 | 93 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TAOP's Valuation (37) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HUBS (100). This means that TAOP’s stock grew somewhat faster than HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
HUBS's Profit vs Risk Rating (92) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as TAOP (100). This means that HUBS’s stock grew similarly to TAOP’s over the last 12 months.
HUBS's SMR Rating (87) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as TAOP (91). This means that HUBS’s stock grew similarly to TAOP’s over the last 12 months.
HUBS's Price Growth Rating (87) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as TAOP (92). This means that HUBS’s stock grew similarly to TAOP’s over the last 12 months.
HUBS's P/E Growth Rating (71) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as TAOP (93). This means that HUBS’s stock grew similarly to TAOP’s over the last 12 months.
| HUBS | TAOP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 76% | 30 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 3 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 3 days ago 90% |
Advertisement
HUBS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUBS has been closely correlated with CRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HUBS jumps, then CRM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HUBS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HUBS | 100% | -1.75% | ||
| CRM - HUBS | 72% Closely correlated | -2.41% | ||
| TEAM - HUBS | 72% Closely correlated | -1.51% | ||
| FRSH - HUBS | 67% Closely correlated | -0.59% | ||
| NOW - HUBS | 66% Loosely correlated | -0.19% | ||
| S - HUBS | 66% Loosely correlated | -0.31% | ||
More | ||||
TAOP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that TAOP and CFCI have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TAOP and CFCI's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TAOP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TAOP | 100% | +0.29% | ||
| CFCI - TAOP | 29% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| UPBD - TAOP | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.25% | ||
| HUBS - TAOP | 27% Poorly correlated | -1.75% | ||
| GEN - TAOP | 25% Poorly correlated | -1.04% | ||
| NTES - TAOP | 25% Poorly correlated | -4.21% | ||
More | ||||