Advertisement
HWC vs WBS
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Hancock Whitney Corporation (HWC) vs. Webster Financial Corporation (WBS) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Both HWC and WBS are regional banks with comparable betas of 1.03, indicating similar market sensitivity.
- WBS boasts a larger market capitalization at $11.6 billion compared to HWC's $5.4 billion.
- WBS shows stronger year-to-date gains of 14.7% versus HWC's 5.8%.
- Dividend yields are attractive for both, with HWC at 2.77% and WBS at 2.23%.
- WBS trades at a lower trailing P/E ratio of 12.17 versus HWC's 13.72, with higher EPS of $5.90.
- Recent market activity reflects sector pressures, with both stocks experiencing short-term dips amid broader banking sentiment.
Introduction
This stock comparison examines HWC and WBS, two regional banks navigating the U.S. financial landscape. Investors and traders focused on the banking sector—particularly those tracking interest rate dynamics, loan growth, and deposit stability—may find value in assessing their relative performance. Amid recent market volatility, understanding differences in scale, profitability, and momentum helps inform portfolio positioning in regional financial stocks. Both companies offer dividends and exposure to commercial and consumer lending, but variances in size and recent trends highlight key trade-offs for diversified strategies.
HWC Overview and Recent Performance
Hancock Whitney Corporation (HWC), headquartered in Gulfport, Mississippi, operates as the holding company for Hancock Whitney Bank. It provides deposit products, loans, treasury management, and wealth services primarily to commercial, small business, and retail customers across the U.S. Southeast. In recent market activity, HWC shares have traded around $66.83, within a 52-week range of $51.17 to $75.43. Year-to-date returns stand at 5.75%, reflecting resilience but lagging broader indices amid banking sector pressures like fluctuating net interest margins (NIM, the difference between interest income and expenses). Sentiment has been influenced by stable profitability metrics, including a 29.9% profit margin and ROE (return on equity) of 9.52%, though recent weeks saw a dip tied to industry-wide concerns.
WBS Overview and Recent Performance
Webster Financial Corporation (WBS), based in Stamford, Connecticut, serves as the holding company for Webster Bank. It operates through commercial banking, healthcare financial services, and consumer banking segments, offering loans, deposits, wealth management, and treasury services nationwide. Recently, WBS shares hovered near $71.81, with a 52-week range of $45.94 to $74.00. Year-to-date performance reached 14.72%, outperforming peers amid positive revenue growth. Key drivers include a robust 37.5% profit margin, ROE of 10.77%, and anticipation for upcoming quarterly earnings. Recent sentiment reflects strength in commercial lending, tempered by sector headwinds like deposit competition.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of 25 top-performing AI trading bots optimized for current market conditions, drawn from hundreds available that trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies, from short-term scalping (1-day holds) to longer-term trends (up to 55 days), with impressive stats like annualized returns of 15% to 168%, win rates of 48% to 88%, and profit factors up to 6.94. Examples include semiconductor-focused bots achieving 70-100% annualized gains on tickers like NVDA and SOXL. Ideal for traders seeking automated signals, this section highlights bots excelling in volatility. Explore them to align with your timeframe and risk tolerance.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Both HWC and WBS follow regional banking models centered on deposits, loans, and fee-based services, but WBS differentiates with dedicated healthcare and consumer segments alongside commercial banking, supporting higher revenue of $2.68 billion TTM versus HWC's $1.39 billion. Growth drivers favor WBS, evident in superior YTD momentum and net income. Recent momentum tilts to WBS with more bullish technicals short-term. Risk profiles align with identical betas and moderate debt levels (WBS higher absolute debt at $4.67 billion), though HWC offers lower leverage. Sector exposure remains U.S. banking, sensitive to rates; market sentiment leans positive for WBS ahead of earnings.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently favors WBS for its stronger recent momentum, larger scale, higher profitability margins, and short-term bullish indicators, positioning it better amid banking recovery trends. While HWC shows long-term value potential, WBS's relative stability and catalysts like impending earnings suggest higher probability of near-term outperformance.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWC is a Buy and WBS is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HWC’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileWBS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- HWC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- WBS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HWC’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WBS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HWC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
- WBS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
HWC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.23% price change this week, while WBS (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.59% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.36%.
Reported Earning Dates
HWC is expected to report earnings on Jul 21, 2026.
WBS is expected to report earnings on Jul 16, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (+1.44% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| HWC | WBS | HWC / WBS | |
| Capitalization | 6.06B | 12.4B | 49% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.628 | 23.240 | 80% |
| P/E Ratio | 14.56 | 12.48 | 117% |
| Revenue | 1.44B | 2.92B | 49% |
| Total Cash | 556M | 353M | 158% |
| Total Debt | 1.68B | 5.55B | 30% |
HWC | WBS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 47 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 46 Fair valued | 61 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 33 | 47 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 23 | 15 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 24 | 47 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HWC's Valuation (46) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WBS (61) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that HWC’s stock grew similarly to WBS’s over the last 12 months.
HWC's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WBS (47) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that HWC’s stock grew similarly to WBS’s over the last 12 months.
WBS's SMR Rating (15) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as HWC (23) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WBS’s stock grew similarly to HWC’s over the last 12 months.
HWC's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WBS (45) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that HWC’s stock grew similarly to WBS’s over the last 12 months.
HWC's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WBS (47) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that HWC’s stock grew similarly to WBS’s over the last 12 months.
| HWC | WBS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 59% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 65% | 4 days ago 55% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 66% | 4 days ago 65% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 61% | 4 days ago 58% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 63% | 4 days ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 66% | 12 days ago 67% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 49% | 4 days ago 49% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| TUSB | 50.37 | 0.03 | +0.07% |
| Thrivent Ultra Short Bond ETF | |||
| SMH | 611.61 | N/A | N/A |
| VanEck Semiconductor ETF | |||
| FTAG | 28.82 | N/A | N/A |
| First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF | |||
| SHDG | 32.65 | -0.07 | -0.21% |
| Soundwatch Hedged Equity ETF | |||
| FFC | 16.19 | -0.09 | -0.55% |
| Flaherty & Crumrine Preferred and Income Securities Fund | |||
HWC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HWC has been closely correlated with UCB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HWC jumps, then UCB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HWC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HWC | 100% | N/A | ||
| UCB - HWC | 87% Closely correlated | -1.55% | ||
| FNB - HWC | 87% Closely correlated | -2.06% | ||
| UBSI - HWC | 87% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| ASB - HWC | 87% Closely correlated | -1.86% | ||
| FULT - HWC | 86% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
WBS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WBS has been closely correlated with WTFC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WBS jumps, then WTFC could also see price increases.