ICE
Price
$156.78
Change
+$0.82 (+0.53%)
Updated
Nov 26, 11:03 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
88.93B
71 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MCO
Price
$486.10
Change
+$0.43 (+0.09%)
Updated
Nov 26, 10:35 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
86.64B
84 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ICE vs MCO

Header iconICE vs MCO Comparison
Open Charts ICE vs MCOBanner chart's image
Intercontinental Exchange
Price$156.78
Change+$0.82 (+0.53%)
Volume$1.96K
Capitalization88.93B
Moody's
Price$486.10
Change+$0.43 (+0.09%)
Volume$978
Capitalization86.64B
ICE vs MCO Comparison Chart in %
ICE
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MCO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ICE vs. MCO commentary
Nov 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ICE is a StrongBuy and MCO is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 26, 2025
Stock price -- (ICE: $155.96 vs. MCO: $485.67)
Brand notoriety: ICE and MCO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Publishing/Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ICE: 58% vs. MCO: 55%
Market capitalization -- ICE: $88.93B vs. MCO: $86.64B
ICE [@Financial Publishing/Services] is valued at $88.93B. MCO’s [@Financial Publishing/Services] market capitalization is $86.64B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry ranges from $149.64B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry is $29.42B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ICE’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMCO’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ICE’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MCO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MCO is a better buy in the long-term than ICE.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ICE’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCO’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ICE’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MCO’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MCO is a better buy in the short-term than ICE.

Price Growth

ICE (@Financial Publishing/Services) experienced а +2.08% price change this week, while MCO (@Financial Publishing/Services) price change was +3.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was +1.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.23%.

Reported Earning Dates

ICE is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.

MCO is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Publishing/Services (+1.23% weekly)

The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ICE($88.9B) and MCO($86.6B) have the same market capitalization . MCO has higher P/E ratio than ICE: MCO (39.07) vs ICE (28.41). ICE YTD gains are higher at: 5.535 vs. MCO (3.381). ICE has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.56B vs. MCO (3.75B). MCO has less debt than ICE: MCO (7.36B) vs ICE (19.5B). ICE has higher revenues than MCO: ICE (12.5B) vs MCO (7.5B).
ICEMCOICE / MCO
Capitalization88.9B86.6B103%
EBITDA6.56B3.75B175%
Gain YTD5.5353.381164%
P/E Ratio28.4139.0773%
Revenue12.5B7.5B167%
Total Cash2.2BN/A-
Total Debt19.5B7.36B265%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ICE vs MCO: Fundamental Ratings
ICE
MCO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
669
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
64
Fair valued
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3233
SMR RATING
1..100
6318
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6258
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7358
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ICE's Valuation (64) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MCO (83) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that ICE’s stock grew similarly to MCO’s over the last 12 months.

ICE's Profit vs Risk Rating (32) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MCO (33) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that ICE’s stock grew similarly to MCO’s over the last 12 months.

MCO's SMR Rating (18) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ICE (63) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that MCO’s stock grew somewhat faster than ICE’s over the last 12 months.

MCO's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as ICE (62) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that MCO’s stock grew similarly to ICE’s over the last 12 months.

MCO's P/E Growth Rating (58) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as ICE (73) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that MCO’s stock grew similarly to ICE’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ICEMCO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
49%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ICE
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MCO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UMMA28.230.45
+1.62%
Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF
VFH128.301.83
+1.45%
Vanguard Financials ETF
QDIV34.670.36
+1.06%
Global X S&P 500® Quality Dividend ETF
SMBS25.860.06
+0.23%
Schwab® Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF
XONE49.650.02
+0.03%
BondBloxx Bloomberg One YrTrgDurUSTrsETF

MCO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCO has been closely correlated with SPGI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MCO jumps, then SPGI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCO
1D Price
Change %
MCO100%
+1.45%
SPGI - MCO
89%
Closely correlated
+1.21%
NDAQ - MCO
80%
Closely correlated
+0.79%
MORN - MCO
76%
Closely correlated
+1.60%
TRU - MCO
69%
Closely correlated
+3.08%
MSCI - MCO
67%
Closely correlated
+1.14%
More