IMO
Price
$68.59
Change
-$4.94 (-6.72%)
Updated
Apr 3 closing price
Capitalization
36.97B
28 days until earnings call
TGS
Price
$25.48
Change
-$1.44 (-5.35%)
Updated
Apr 3 closing price
Capitalization
2.31B
38 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

IMO vs TGS

Header iconIMO vs TGS Comparison
Open Charts IMO vs TGSBanner chart's image
Imperial Oil
Price$68.59
Change-$4.94 (-6.72%)
Volume$767.14K
Capitalization36.97B
Transportadora de Gas del Sur SA
Price$25.48
Change-$1.44 (-5.35%)
Volume$219.45K
Capitalization2.31B
IMO vs TGS Comparison Chart
Loading...
IMO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TGS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IMO vs. TGS commentary
Apr 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IMO is a Buy and TGS is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 04, 2025
Stock price -- (IMO: $68.59 vs. TGS: $25.48)
Brand notoriety: IMO and TGS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Integrated Oil industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IMO: 159% vs. TGS: 71%
Market capitalization -- IMO: $36.97B vs. TGS: $2.31B
IMO [@Integrated Oil] is valued at $36.97B. TGS’s [@Integrated Oil] market capitalization is $2.31B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Integrated Oil] industry ranges from $461.22B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Integrated Oil] industry is $63.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IMO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTGS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • IMO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TGS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, IMO is a better buy in the long-term than TGS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IMO’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TGS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IMO’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • TGS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IMO is a better buy in the short-term than TGS.

Price Growth

IMO (@Integrated Oil) experienced а -5.09% price change this week, while TGS (@Integrated Oil) price change was -8.87% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Integrated Oil industry was -4.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.34%.

Reported Earning Dates

IMO is expected to report earnings on May 02, 2025.

TGS is expected to report earnings on May 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Integrated Oil (-4.21% weekly)

Integrated oil companies are involved across nearly the entire oil value chain – from upstream operations like exploration and production, to downstream functions of refining and marketing. Exxon Mobil Corporation, Chevron Corporation and BP are major integrated oil companies. Their bottom lines’ response to crude oil prices could depend on the proportion of upstream vs. downstream businesses; for example, if a company has substantial downstream business, the adverse impact on their upstream business due to falling crude prices could be mitigated by benefits to its downstream business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IMO($37B) has a higher market cap than TGS($2.31B). TGS has higher P/E ratio than IMO: TGS (241.29) vs IMO (11.12). IMO YTD gains are higher at: 11.347 vs. TGS (-12.948). TGS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 49.7B vs. IMO (8.35B). TGS has more cash in the bank: 164B vs. IMO (864M). IMO has less debt than TGS: IMO (4.33B) vs TGS (201B). TGS has higher revenues than IMO: TGS (139B) vs IMO (48.3B).
IMOTGSIMO / TGS
Capitalization37B2.31B1,602%
EBITDA8.35B49.7B17%
Gain YTD11.347-12.948-88%
P/E Ratio11.12241.295%
Revenue48.3B139B35%
Total Cash864M164B1%
Total Debt4.33B201B2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IMO vs TGS: Fundamental Ratings
IMO
TGS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1571
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
41
Fair valued
80
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
712
SMR RATING
1..100
4359
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4441
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
52100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IMO's Valuation (41) in the Integrated Oil industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TGS (80) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry. This means that IMO’s stock grew somewhat faster than TGS’s over the last 12 months.

IMO's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as TGS (12) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry. This means that IMO’s stock grew similarly to TGS’s over the last 12 months.

IMO's SMR Rating (43) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as TGS (59) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry. This means that IMO’s stock grew similarly to TGS’s over the last 12 months.

TGS's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry is in the same range as IMO (44) in the Integrated Oil industry. This means that TGS’s stock grew similarly to IMO’s over the last 12 months.

IMO's P/E Growth Rating (52) in the Integrated Oil industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TGS (100) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry. This means that IMO’s stock grew somewhat faster than TGS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IMOTGS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
IMO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TGS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SFENX9.67N/A
N/A
Schwab Fundamental Emerging Mkts Eq Idx
CGTUX84.26N/A
N/A
Columbia Global Technology Growth Inst3
MNOZX33.70N/A
N/A
Manning & Napier Overseas Series Z
CSGTX3.96N/A
N/A
Transamerica Small Cap Growth C
CNWCX73.56-1.79
-2.38%
American Funds New World 529C

IMO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IMO has been closely correlated with SU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IMO jumps, then SU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IMO
1D Price
Change %
IMO100%
-6.72%
SU - IMO
78%
Closely correlated
-6.01%
CVE - IMO
67%
Closely correlated
-8.19%
SHEL - IMO
63%
Loosely correlated
-4.06%
XOM - IMO
62%
Loosely correlated
-5.26%
CVX - IMO
61%
Loosely correlated
-6.22%
More

TGS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TGS has been closely correlated with YPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TGS jumps, then YPF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TGS
1D Price
Change %
TGS100%
-5.35%
YPF - TGS
77%
Closely correlated
-5.49%
EC - TGS
41%
Loosely correlated
-5.54%
E - TGS
34%
Loosely correlated
-3.44%
IMO - TGS
33%
Poorly correlated
-6.72%
CVE - TGS
30%
Poorly correlated
-8.19%
More