Gold Fields Limited (GFI) and Newmont Corporation (NEM) represent two prominent players in the gold mining sector, making them natural subjects for comparison among investors seeking exposure to precious metals. This analysis examines their business profiles, recent stock behavior, and key differentiators in the current market environment. The comparison is particularly relevant for traders and portfolio managers focused on commodity-linked equities, sector rotation strategies, or relative value assessments within the materials industry. Both companies’ performances are heavily influenced by gold price movements and operational execution.
Gold Fields Limited (GFI) is a South Africa-based gold mining company with operations primarily in Africa, Australia, and the Americas. The firm focuses on gold production with some copper byproducts. In recent market activity, GFI has experienced sharper declines amid broader consolidation in gold equities. Sentiment has been shaped by ongoing gold price fluctuations and sector-wide pressures, with performance reflecting typical volatility for mid-tier producers. Key influences include production guidance and cost management, which continue to inform investor views during periods of market uncertainty.
Newmont Corporation (NEM) is the world’s largest gold producer by market capitalization, with a diversified portfolio of mines across multiple continents. The company generates revenue primarily from gold, with additional contributions from copper and other metals. In recent weeks, NEM has shown relative resilience compared to peers, though it recorded a 12.49% decline over the past month amid sector headwinds. Recent market activity has been influenced by anticipation surrounding its Q2 2026 earnings release scheduled for July 23, alongside broader precious metals dynamics. Longer-term returns remain solid, with a 56.33% one-year gain and 9.77% year-to-date performance.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots designed for various market conditions. Tickeron offers hundreds of AI Trading Bots that trade thousands of different tickers, yet only the best and most suitable for current market conditions earn placement in this trending section. Available bots feature a wide range of performance metrics, with many demonstrating win rates between 55% and 75%, profit factors exceeding 1.5, and maximum drawdowns typically managed below 20% depending on strategy and timeframe. All the AI trading bots have different trading styles, strategies, timeframes, performances, statistics, and sets of tickers they trade. This resource provides traders with data-driven options for automated execution across equities including gold miners. Explore the full selection on the Trending AI Robots page for additional insights.
GFI and NEM both operate in the gold mining sector but differ significantly in scale and geographic exposure. NEM maintains a larger, more diversified asset base spanning five continents, providing greater operational stability, while GFI concentrates on higher-margin assets in select regions. Growth drivers for both center on gold prices and production efficiency, though NEM benefits from broader revenue streams including copper. Recent momentum has favored NEM’s relative resilience, whereas GFI has faced sharper short-term pressure. Risk factors include commodity price sensitivity and cost inflation for both, with NEM carrying lower concentration risk due to its size. Market sentiment reflects sector trends, positioning NEM as the more established benchmark and GFI as a higher-beta alternative.
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency and relative positioning in recent market activity, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modest edge to NEM due to its larger scale, stronger longer-term returns, and upcoming earnings catalyst that could clarify operational momentum. GFI presents a viable alternative for investors seeking potentially higher volatility exposure within the sector. This assessment remains probabilistic and tied to prevailing conditions rather than a definitive recommendation.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GFI’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNEM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GFI’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NEM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
GFI (@Precious Metals) experienced а +3.87% price change this week, while NEM (@Precious Metals) price change was +1.10% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was -24.24%.
GFI is expected to report earnings on Aug 25, 2026.
NEM is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.
The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.
| GFI | NEM | GFI / NEM | |
| Capitalization | 28.8B | 101B | 29% |
| EBITDA | 6.34B | 16.2B | 39% |
| Gain YTD | -20.965 | -3.678 | 570% |
| P/E Ratio | 8.51 | 12.08 | 70% |
| Revenue | 8.75B | 25B | 35% |
| Total Cash | 1.78B | 8.78B | 20% |
| Total Debt | 3.22B | 5.53B | 58% |
GFI | NEM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 15 | 68 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 4 Undervalued | 62 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 51 | 53 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 20 | 37 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 95 | 41 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GFI's Valuation (4) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NEM (62). This means that GFI’s stock grew somewhat faster than NEM’s over the last 12 months.
GFI's Profit vs Risk Rating (51) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as NEM (53). This means that GFI’s stock grew similarly to NEM’s over the last 12 months.
GFI's SMR Rating (20) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as NEM (37). This means that GFI’s stock grew similarly to NEM’s over the last 12 months.
NEM's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as GFI (62). This means that NEM’s stock grew similarly to GFI’s over the last 12 months.
NEM's P/E Growth Rating (41) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GFI (95). This means that NEM’s stock grew somewhat faster than GFI’s over the last 12 months.
| GFI | NEM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 80% | 10 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 62% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 63% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GFI has been closely correlated with AU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GFI jumps, then AU could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NEM has been closely correlated with KGC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NEM jumps, then KGC could also see price increases.