Both First Trust Indxx Aerospace & Defense ETF (MISL) and Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD) target the expanding aerospace and defense sector, driven by sustained government spending and technological advancement. They do not compete directly as identical products; instead, they offer complementary strategies within the same broad theme. MISL tracks a U.S.-focused index of aerospace and defense firms, while SHLD provides exposure to global defense technology companies. This comparison helps investors assess structural differences, cost efficiency, and relative positioning for portfolio allocation decisions in the current market environment.
First Trust Indxx Aerospace & Defense ETF (MISL) is a passively managed exchange-traded fund that seeks to track the performance of the Indxx US Aerospace & Defense Index. The fund typically holds 35–50 U.S.-listed companies involved in advanced and traditional aerospace and defense activities. Top holdings often include Palantir Technologies (PLTR), RTX Corporation (RTX), Boeing (BA), and General Electric (GE), with the top 10 positions representing a substantial portion of assets. Sector allocation is heavily weighted toward Industrials (approximately 80–85%) and Technology (15–20%). MISL carries an expense ratio of 0.60% and employs a market-capitalization-weighted methodology with periodic rebalancing to maintain index alignment. Its U.S.-only focus and emphasis on established contractors distinguish it as a targeted vehicle for domestic defense exposure.
Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD) is a passively managed exchange-traded fund designed to track the Global X Defense Tech Index. The fund holds approximately 50 securities representing pure-play defense technology companies worldwide. Top holdings commonly feature Palantir Technologies (PLTR), RTX Corporation (RTX), General Dynamics (GD), and Lockheed Martin (LMT), with the largest positions comprising over half of total assets. Sector breakdown shows dominant exposure to Industrials (roughly 85–90%) and Technology (10–15%). SHLD applies a modified market-capitalization weighting scheme and maintains an expense ratio of 0.50%. Its global scope and inclusion of cybersecurity and intelligence-focused firms set it apart as a vehicle emphasizing technological innovation within the defense theme.
The aerospace and defense sector benefits from elevated government budgets, geopolitical tensions, and accelerating adoption of advanced technologies including artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, and autonomous systems. Capital flows into defense-related equities have remained resilient across recent market cycles as nations prioritize modernization programs. Regulatory developments around export controls and supply-chain security continue to influence company operations, while macroeconomic factors such as interest rate trajectories and fiscal policy shape overall investment sentiment. Sector risks include potential shifts in defense appropriations, supply-chain disruptions, and valuation pressures in high-growth technology subsegments. Both ETFs position investors to participate in these durable trends without reliance on short-term price fluctuations.
In recent weeks and months, both ETFs have exhibited sensitivity to broader defense spending announcements and earnings results from major contractors. MISL’s U.S.-centric holdings have provided relatively stable exposure during domestic policy shifts, while SHLD’s global composition has introduced modest additional volatility tied to international developments. Relative positioning favors SHLD’s lower cost structure and broader technology tilt for investors seeking efficiency and innovation exposure. MISL offers tighter alignment with traditional U.S. aerospace supply chains. Volatility differences stem primarily from geographic concentration and weighting methodologies rather than isolated market events, with both funds reflecting sector rotation patterns driven by earnings cycles and macroeconomic expectations.
Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking data-driven insights into defense-themed ETFs and related securities may find the tool particularly useful for refining their research process.
Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modestly higher probability of favor to Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD). Its lower expense ratio, global diversification across defense technology names, and modified weighting approach toward pure-play innovators provide a balanced combination of cost efficiency and thematic breadth. MISL remains a strong alternative for investors prioritizing concentrated U.S. aerospace exposure. The assessment reflects relative strengths in diversification, cost, and sector momentum without constituting investment advice.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
| MISL | SHLD | MISL / SHLD | |
| Gain YTD | 6.469 | 3.882 | 167% |
| Net Assets | 762M | 7.42B | 10% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.50 | 120% |
| Turnover | 22.00 | 32.79 | 67% |
| Yield | 0.32 | 0.67 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 3 years | - |
| MISL | SHLD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 68% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 87% | 10 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 90% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| KBDU | 12.30 | 0.33 | +2.79% |
| KraneShares 2x Long BIDU Daily ETF | |||
| JADE | 80.00 | 0.87 | +1.10% |
| JPMorgan Active Developing Mkts Eq ETF | |||
| XJH | 51.85 | 0.17 | +0.33% |
| iShares ESG Select Scrn S&P Mid-Cap ETF | |||
| IBTH | 22.38 | 0.01 | +0.04% |
| iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Tr ETF | |||
| PFFR | 17.42 | -0.08 | -0.46% |
| InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MISL has been closely correlated with KTOS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MISL jumps, then KTOS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MISL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MISL | 100% | +0.71% | ||
| KTOS - MISL | 73% Closely correlated | +1.76% | ||
| CW - MISL | 68% Closely correlated | -2.05% | ||
| HEI - MISL | 66% Closely correlated | +1.27% | ||
| RTX - MISL | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.12% | ||
| AIR - MISL | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.84% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SHLD has been loosely correlated with LHX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SHLD jumps, then LHX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SHLD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHLD | 100% | -0.83% | ||
| LHX - SHLD | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.37% | ||
| NOC - SHLD | 63% Loosely correlated | -2.28% | ||
| GD - SHLD | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.46% | ||
| BWXT - SHLD | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.22% | ||
| LMT - SHLD | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.38% | ||
More | ||||