MISL
Price
$45.53
Change
+$0.32 (+0.71%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Net Assets
762.15M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SHLD
Price
$67.09
Change
-$0.56 (-0.83%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Net Assets
7.42B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MISL vs SHLD

MISL vs SHLD Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 22, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? First Trust Indxx Aerospace & Defense ETF (MISL) vs. Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD)

Key Takeaways

  • First Trust Indxx Aerospace & Defense ETF (MISL) and Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD) both provide targeted exposure to the aerospace and defense sector but differ in geographic scope, with MISL focused on U.S. companies and SHLD including global defense technology firms.
  • SHLD offers a lower expense ratio of 0.50% compared to MISL’s 0.60%, potentially improving net returns for long-term holders in a cost-sensitive environment.
  • Both ETFs maintain concentrated portfolios of approximately 35–50 holdings, with significant overlap in top positions such as Palantir Technologies (PLTR) and RTX Corporation (RTX), emphasizing large-cap defense contractors and technology providers.
  • Sector allocations for both are dominated by Industrials (roughly 80–90%), supplemented by Technology exposure, reflecting their focus on traditional defense hardware and emerging defense tech applications.
  • SHLD’s modified market-cap weighting and emphasis on pure-play defense technology companies provide a slightly broader thematic tilt toward cybersecurity and intelligence solutions relative to MISL’s more traditional aerospace and defense index methodology.
  • Investors comparing the two should consider MISL’s U.S.-centric approach versus SHLD’s global reach when evaluating diversification within the defense theme amid evolving geopolitical and budgetary dynamics.

Introduction

Both First Trust Indxx Aerospace & Defense ETF (MISL) and Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD) target the expanding aerospace and defense sector, driven by sustained government spending and technological advancement. They do not compete directly as identical products; instead, they offer complementary strategies within the same broad theme. MISL tracks a U.S.-focused index of aerospace and defense firms, while SHLD provides exposure to global defense technology companies. This comparison helps investors assess structural differences, cost efficiency, and relative positioning for portfolio allocation decisions in the current market environment.

First Trust Indxx Aerospace & Defense ETF (MISL) Overview

First Trust Indxx Aerospace & Defense ETF (MISL) is a passively managed exchange-traded fund that seeks to track the performance of the Indxx US Aerospace & Defense Index. The fund typically holds 35–50 U.S.-listed companies involved in advanced and traditional aerospace and defense activities. Top holdings often include Palantir Technologies (PLTR), RTX Corporation (RTX), Boeing (BA), and General Electric (GE), with the top 10 positions representing a substantial portion of assets. Sector allocation is heavily weighted toward Industrials (approximately 80–85%) and Technology (15–20%). MISL carries an expense ratio of 0.60% and employs a market-capitalization-weighted methodology with periodic rebalancing to maintain index alignment. Its U.S.-only focus and emphasis on established contractors distinguish it as a targeted vehicle for domestic defense exposure.

Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD) Overview

Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD) is a passively managed exchange-traded fund designed to track the Global X Defense Tech Index. The fund holds approximately 50 securities representing pure-play defense technology companies worldwide. Top holdings commonly feature Palantir Technologies (PLTR), RTX Corporation (RTX), General Dynamics (GD), and Lockheed Martin (LMT), with the largest positions comprising over half of total assets. Sector breakdown shows dominant exposure to Industrials (roughly 85–90%) and Technology (10–15%). SHLD applies a modified market-capitalization weighting scheme and maintains an expense ratio of 0.50%. Its global scope and inclusion of cybersecurity and intelligence-focused firms set it apart as a vehicle emphasizing technological innovation within the defense theme.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The aerospace and defense sector benefits from elevated government budgets, geopolitical tensions, and accelerating adoption of advanced technologies including artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, and autonomous systems. Capital flows into defense-related equities have remained resilient across recent market cycles as nations prioritize modernization programs. Regulatory developments around export controls and supply-chain security continue to influence company operations, while macroeconomic factors such as interest rate trajectories and fiscal policy shape overall investment sentiment. Sector risks include potential shifts in defense appropriations, supply-chain disruptions, and valuation pressures in high-growth technology subsegments. Both ETFs position investors to participate in these durable trends without reliance on short-term price fluctuations.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent weeks and months, both ETFs have exhibited sensitivity to broader defense spending announcements and earnings results from major contractors. MISL’s U.S.-centric holdings have provided relatively stable exposure during domestic policy shifts, while SHLD’s global composition has introduced modest additional volatility tied to international developments. Relative positioning favors SHLD’s lower cost structure and broader technology tilt for investors seeking efficiency and innovation exposure. MISL offers tighter alignment with traditional U.S. aerospace supply chains. Volatility differences stem primarily from geographic concentration and weighting methodologies rather than isolated market events, with both funds reflecting sector rotation patterns driven by earnings cycles and macroeconomic expectations.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking data-driven insights into defense-themed ETFs and related securities may find the tool particularly useful for refining their research process.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modestly higher probability of favor to Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD). Its lower expense ratio, global diversification across defense technology names, and modified weighting approach toward pure-play innovators provide a balanced combination of cost efficiency and thematic breadth. MISL remains a strong alternative for investors prioritizing concentrated U.S. aerospace exposure. The assessment reflects relative strengths in diversification, cost, and sector momentum without constituting investment advice.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
MISL vs. SHLD commentary
Aug 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MISL is a Hold and SHLD is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHLD has more net assets: 7.42B vs. MISL (762M). MISL has a higher annual dividend yield than SHLD: MISL (6.469) vs SHLD (3.882). MISL was incepted earlier than SHLD: MISL (4 years) vs SHLD (3 years). SHLD (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than MISL (0.60). SHLD has a higher turnover MISL (22.00) vs MISL (22.00).
MISLSHLDMISL / SHLD
Gain YTD6.4693.882167%
Net Assets762M7.42B10%
Total Expense Ratio0.600.50120%
Turnover22.0032.7967%
Yield0.320.6747%
Fund Existence4 years3 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MISLSHLD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MISL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SHLD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KBDU12.300.33
+2.79%
KraneShares 2x Long BIDU Daily ETF
JADE80.000.87
+1.10%
JPMorgan Active Developing Mkts Eq ETF
XJH51.850.17
+0.33%
iShares ESG Select Scrn S&P Mid-Cap ETF
IBTH22.380.01
+0.04%
iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Tr ETF
PFFR17.42-0.08
-0.46%
InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF

MISL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MISL has been closely correlated with KTOS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MISL jumps, then KTOS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MISL
1D Price
Change %
MISL100%
+0.71%
KTOS - MISL
73%
Closely correlated
+1.76%
CW - MISL
68%
Closely correlated
-2.05%
HEI - MISL
66%
Closely correlated
+1.27%
RTX - MISL
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.12%
AIR - MISL
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.84%
More

SHLD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SHLD has been loosely correlated with LHX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SHLD jumps, then LHX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHLD
1D Price
Change %
SHLD100%
-0.83%
LHX - SHLD
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.37%
NOC - SHLD
63%
Loosely correlated
-2.28%
GD - SHLD
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.46%
BWXT - SHLD
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.22%
LMT - SHLD
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.38%
More