Investors evaluating the financial infrastructure and data space frequently encounter two prominent names: NDAQ and SPGI. Both companies sit at the center of global capital markets, yet they serve those markets in fundamentally different ways. Nasdaq is best known for its iconic stock exchange, but it has spent recent years diversifying aggressively into financial technology, anti-financial-crime software, and index services. S&P Global, meanwhile, is the steward of credit ratings relied upon by bond markets worldwide, while also operating vast data, analytics, and commodity pricing businesses. This comparison is designed for traders, long-term investors, and market observers who want to understand how these two blue-chip financial stocks stack up against each other in the current environment.
NDAQ has undergone a notable strategic evolution in recent years. Once primarily viewed as the technology-heavy stock exchange, Nasdaq now generates the majority of its revenue from solutions rather than transaction-based market services. The company reported full-year 2025 net revenue of $5.2 billion, representing a 13% increase year-over-year, with solutions revenue crossing the $4 billion mark for the first time. Annualized recurring revenue reached $3.1 billion, growing 10% on an organic basis, while annualized software-as-a-service (SaaS) revenue — a key metric for sticky, high-margin growth — represented 38% of total ARR.
Recent market activity has highlighted several catalysts. The Index business delivered record net inflows of $99 billion over the trailing twelve months, while the Financial Technology segment — which includes the Verafin financial crime management platform and regulatory technology solutions — posted double-digit ARR growth. The integration of Adenza (the 2023 acquisition that brought together Calypso and AxiomSL) has progressed ahead of schedule, with cross-sell activity accelerating. Nasdaq also maintained its leadership in U.S. listings for the seventh consecutive year and executed the largest exchange transfer on record with Walmart's switch to the Nasdaq market. Market Services revenue has benefited from elevated trading volumes, though this segment remains sensitive to market activity cycles. Analysts remain broadly constructive, with a consensus "Buy" rating and price targets suggesting double-digit upside from recent trading levels.
SPGI stands as one of the most deeply embedded institutions in global finance. The company operates through five divisions: Ratings, Market Intelligence, Commodity Insights, Mobility, and S&P Dow Jones Indices. For full-year 2024, the company reported $14.2 billion in revenue (up 14% year-over-year), with adjusted diluted earnings per share (EPS) of $15.70, a 25% increase. Through 2025, the company continued its trajectory with quarterly revenue reaching $3.92 billion in Q4 2025 (up 9% year-over-year) and adjusted operating margins consistently above 47%.
In recent months, S&P Global has been actively reshaping its portfolio. The company announced the acquisition of With Intelligence for $1.8 billion to accelerate growth in private markets data. Simultaneously, it completed the divestiture of OSTTRA and announced the planned spin-off of its Mobility division into a standalone public company — moves designed to sharpen strategic focus on higher-growth, higher-margin segments. The Ratings division, which benefits from debt issuance cycles and refinancing activity, has been a particular driver of profitability, though its performance can be cyclical. Under new CEO Martina Cheung, who assumed the role in November 2024, the company has emphasized operational discipline and innovation investments. SPGI returned approximately $6.2 billion to shareholders in 2025 through dividends and share repurchases, and it extended its remarkable record to 52 consecutive years of dividend increases.
For traders and investors seeking a data-driven edge in evaluating stocks like NDAQ and SPGI, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of the platform's most relevant AI-powered trading bots. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers across equities, ETFs, and other asset classes, but only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with current market conditions earn a place in the Trending AI Robots section. These bots employ varied trading styles — ranging from short-term momentum strategies to longer-duration trend-following approaches — and each bot comes with distinct performance metrics, statistical profiles, and ticker universes. Some bots have achieved annualized returns in the double digits, while others are designed to prioritize risk-adjusted consistency over raw returns. The curated selection helps traders cut through the noise and identify bots that match their investment timeframe and risk tolerance. Explore the Trending AI Robots page to see which strategies are currently gaining traction.
When comparing NDAQ and SPGI side by side, several structural differences stand out. The most obvious is scale: SPGI generates roughly three times the annual revenue of NDAQ ($15.3 billion versus $5.2 billion) and operates at substantially wider margins. SPGI's adjusted operating margin of approximately 49-50% reflects the extraordinary profitability of its Ratings franchise and the scalability of its data and analytics products. NDAQ's margins are lower but improving, driven by the ongoing shift toward higher-margin solutions and SaaS revenue.
On the growth front, NDAQ has posted faster recent top-line expansion, with 2025 revenue growth of 13% compared to SPGI's 7-8%. However, SPGI's growth tends to be of higher quality — a larger share comes from subscription and recurring sources, whereas a portion of NDAQ's revenue remains tied to transaction volumes and market activity. Risk profiles differ meaningfully as well. NDAQ carries execution risk related to the Adenza integration and cross-sell targets, alongside exposure to equity market volumes. SPGI faces cyclical risk in its Ratings business, which can slow during periods of reduced debt issuance, though this is partly offset by the secular growth in passive investing that benefits its Indices division. Both companies have returned significant capital to shareholders, but SPGI's free cash flow generation — approximately $5.6-$5.8 billion in 2025 — vastly exceeds NDAQ's, giving it greater capacity for dividends, buybacks, and strategic M&A (mergers and acquisitions) simultaneously.
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, margin profile, competitive moat durability, and risk-reward positioning, Tickeron's AI would likely lean toward SPGI as the more structurally advantaged name for the current market environment. SPGI's combination of dominant market share in credit ratings, near-50% adjusted operating margins, massive free cash flow generation, and 52-year track record of dividend growth presents a rare combination of quality attributes. While NDAQ offers a compelling transformation story with faster headline growth, it also carries more execution uncertainty and greater sensitivity to trading volumes. In probabilistic terms, SPGI's more predictable earnings stream and wider economic moat would likely register as the more favorable risk-adjusted opportunity, though NDAQ remains a strong contender — particularly for investors willing to accept higher volatility in exchange for a potentially steeper growth trajectory. The AI's assessment emphasizes that neither stock appears weak, but the edge in stability and margin quality currently favors S&P Global.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Disclaimers and LimitationsIt is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NDAQ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSPGI’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
NDAQ’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SPGI’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
NDAQ (@Financial Publishing/Services) experienced а +0.49% price change this week, while SPGI (@Financial Publishing/Services) price change was -5.42% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was -3.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was -12.93%.
NDAQ is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2026.
SPGI is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.
The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.
| NDAQ | SPGI | NDAQ / SPGI | |
| Capitalization | 51.5B | 126B | 41% |
| EBITDA | 3.32B | 8.14B | 41% |
| Gain YTD | -4.548 | -13.311 | 34% |
| P/E Ratio | 26.85 | 26.97 | 100% |
| Revenue | 8.3B | 15.7B | 53% |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 9.45B | 13.8B | 68% |
NDAQ | SPGI | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 32 | 78 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 73 Overvalued | 78 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 32 | 80 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 53 | 58 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | 53 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 76 | 85 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NDAQ's Valuation (73) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as SPGI (78) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that NDAQ’s stock grew similarly to SPGI’s over the last 12 months.
NDAQ's Profit vs Risk Rating (32) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SPGI (80) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that NDAQ’s stock grew somewhat faster than SPGI’s over the last 12 months.
NDAQ's SMR Rating (53) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as SPGI (58) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that NDAQ’s stock grew similarly to SPGI’s over the last 12 months.
NDAQ's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as SPGI (53) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that NDAQ’s stock grew similarly to SPGI’s over the last 12 months.
NDAQ's P/E Growth Rating (76) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as SPGI (85) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that NDAQ’s stock grew similarly to SPGI’s over the last 12 months.
| NDAQ | SPGI | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 48% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 41% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 51% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 51% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 64% | 10 days ago 54% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago 47% | 3 days ago 53% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 3 days ago 56% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NDAQ has been closely correlated with JEF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NDAQ jumps, then JEF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NDAQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NDAQ | 100% | +1.85% | ||
| JEF - NDAQ | 71% Closely correlated | +0.50% | ||
| MS - NDAQ | 71% Closely correlated | -0.33% | ||
| GS - NDAQ | 70% Closely correlated | -1.26% | ||
| RJF - NDAQ | 69% Closely correlated | +1.90% | ||
| SPGI - NDAQ | 68% Closely correlated | +1.52% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPGI has been closely correlated with MCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SPGI jumps, then MCO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SPGI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPGI | 100% | +1.52% | ||
| MCO - SPGI | 88% Closely correlated | -0.16% | ||
| NDAQ - SPGI | 68% Closely correlated | +1.85% | ||
| MSCI - SPGI | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.31% | ||
| FDS - SPGI | 64% Loosely correlated | +4.26% | ||
| MORN - SPGI | 63% Loosely correlated | +3.01% | ||
More | ||||