NDAQ and SPGI operate at the intersection of financial markets, technology, and data analytics, making them compelling comparables for investors seeking exposure to exchange operations and market intelligence. NDAQ, the operator of the Nasdaq exchange, emphasizes trading infrastructure and fintech solutions, while SPGI excels in benchmarks, ratings, and analytics like the S&P 500 index. Traders monitoring relative performance, growth drivers, and AI-driven innovations in financial services will find this stock comparison valuable for assessing market positioning amid evolving trading volumes and data demands.
Nasdaq, Inc. (NDAQ) runs one of the world's largest electronic stock markets, alongside providing data products, index licensing, and financial technology solutions. In recent market activity, NDAQ shares have shown upward momentum, climbing about 7.6% over the past month to around $89.90, buoyed by robust Q1 2026 results. Revenue reached $1.41 billion, up significantly year-over-year, with adjusted EPS (earnings per share) of $0.96 exceeding forecasts. Key influences include AI integration in cloud solutions, new trading features like 23/5 operations, and a dividend increase, fostering positive sentiment despite broader YTD fluctuations. Trading volume spiked on earnings day, underscoring investor confidence in its fintech pivot.
S&P Global Inc. (SPGI) delivers essential financial information through indices, ratings, commodity insights, and market intelligence platforms. Shares have hovered near $435 in recent weeks, with YTD gains around 16% reflecting resilience amid sector volatility. Performance has been shaped by strategic announcements, including the AI-powered Titan platform for energy data and a partnership expansion with SLB, alongside a new direction for its upstream energy business. Investors await Q1 earnings on April 28, following earlier 2026 guidance concerns that pressured shares. Steady dividend yield of 0.89% and analyst overweight ratings support sentiment, though beta of 1.20 signals moderate volatility tied to economic cycles.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, curated from hundreds available that trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. Out of over 350 bots, 25 trending ones are highlighted based on AI analysis of current market conditions, spanning signal agents for real-time alerts, virtual agents with risk controls, and brokerage agents. These bots vary in styles—from short-term 5-minute scalps to longer-term strategies—using technical, fundamental analysis, and volatility filters (low to high). While specific win rates and returns fluctuate, they demonstrate diverse performances suited to today's dynamic markets. Traders can copy these bots to automate strategies; explore the page to identify fits for your portfolio.
NDAQ and SPGI both leverage data moats in capital markets, but diverge in models: NDAQ generates revenue from transaction fees and tech services (growing via AI/cloud), while SPGI relies on subscriptions for analytics and ratings. Growth drivers include rising trading volumes for NDAQ and AI-enhanced data for SPGI. Recent momentum favors NDAQ post-earnings, contrasting SPGI's steadier YTD path. Risks encompass market downturns hitting NDAQ volumes and AI disruption/regulation for SPGI. Sector exposure overlaps in financials, with SPGI broader in commodities; sentiment tilts toward NDAQ's catalysts amid analyst upgrades.
Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward NDAQ with higher probability for near-term upside, based on earnings momentum, AI-driven growth consistency, and recent price stability versus SPGI's pending results. SPGI offers defensive appeal through scale and diversification, potentially gaining post-earnings if beats occur. Relative positioning favors trend-following in NDAQ amid positive fintech sentiment.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NDAQ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSPGI’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
NDAQ’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SPGI’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
NDAQ (@Financial Publishing/Services) experienced а +2.31% price change this week, while SPGI (@Financial Publishing/Services) price change was -1.30% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was +1.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was -16.69%.
NDAQ is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2026.
SPGI is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.
The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.
| NDAQ | SPGI | NDAQ / SPGI | |
| Capitalization | 50.3B | 124B | 41% |
| EBITDA | 3.32B | 8.14B | 41% |
| Gain YTD | -7.771 | -19.466 | 40% |
| P/E Ratio | 26.80 | 26.50 | 101% |
| Revenue | 8.3B | 15.7B | 53% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 1.81B | - |
| Total Debt | 9.45B | 13.8B | 68% |
NDAQ | SPGI | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 83 | 14 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 74 Overvalued | 68 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 28 | 78 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 53 | 58 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 55 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 82 | 84 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SPGI's Valuation (68) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as NDAQ (74) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that SPGI’s stock grew similarly to NDAQ’s over the last 12 months.
NDAQ's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SPGI (78) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that NDAQ’s stock grew somewhat faster than SPGI’s over the last 12 months.
NDAQ's SMR Rating (53) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as SPGI (58) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that NDAQ’s stock grew similarly to SPGI’s over the last 12 months.
NDAQ's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as SPGI (59) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that NDAQ’s stock grew similarly to SPGI’s over the last 12 months.
NDAQ's P/E Growth Rating (82) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as SPGI (84) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that NDAQ’s stock grew similarly to SPGI’s over the last 12 months.
| NDAQ | SPGI | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 55% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 47% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 49% | 3 days ago 45% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 35% | 3 days ago 60% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 51% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 52% | 3 days ago 50% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 5 days ago 54% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 47% | 12 days ago 52% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 63% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 56% | 3 days ago 45% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NDAQ has been closely correlated with JEF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NDAQ jumps, then JEF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NDAQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NDAQ | 100% | +2.95% | ||
| JEF - NDAQ | 71% Closely correlated | +3.35% | ||
| MS - NDAQ | 71% Closely correlated | +0.65% | ||
| GS - NDAQ | 70% Closely correlated | +2.62% | ||
| RJF - NDAQ | 69% Closely correlated | +2.65% | ||
| SPGI - NDAQ | 69% Closely correlated | +1.35% | ||
More | ||||