Investors tracking the real estate sector often encounter two very different types of companies: those that thrive on commercial property transactions and those rooted in residential brokerage. NMRK (Newmark Group) and RMAX (RE/MAX Holdings) exemplify this divide. One is a rapidly growing commercial real estate advisory firm posting record revenues; the other is a globally recognized residential franchise brand navigating a prolonged housing market contraction. This stock comparison examines their contrasting business models, recent financial trajectories, and relative market positioning, offering insights for traders and investors evaluating exposure to real estate-oriented equities.
NMRK, or Newmark Group, is a leading commercial real estate advisor and service provider to large institutional investors, global corporations, and property owners. Founded in 1929, the company operates from approximately 175 offices across four continents and employs more than 9,300 professionals. Its service lines span leasing, capital markets (including investment sales and debt placement), property and facilities management, valuation and advisory, and servicing.
In recent quarters, Newmark has delivered standout financial results. For the third quarter of 2025, the company reported total revenues of $863.5 million, a 25.9% year-over-year increase, with double-digit gains across every major business line. Capital markets revenues surged 59.7%, outpacing the broader industry for the eighth consecutive quarter. For the full year 2025, total revenues reached approximately $3.3 billion, up 15.3% in the fourth quarter alone. Adjusted EPS (Earnings Per Share) rose 23.6% year-over-year in Q4 2025, and management raised its full-year outlook multiple times throughout the year.
Newmark has also been expanding its global footprint. Recent moves include the acquisition of RealFoundations, a management consulting firm serving institutional real estate clients, and the launch of property and facilities management operations in India and the Asia-Pacific region. The company continues to invest in recurring revenue businesses, which reached record levels, and has increased its share repurchase authorization to $400 million. With a net leverage ratio of approximately 1x, the balance sheet remains conservative relative to earnings power.
RMAX, or RE/MAX Holdings, is the parent company of RE/MAX, one of the world's largest franchisors of real estate brokerage services, and Motto Mortgage, the first national mortgage brokerage franchise brand in the United States. Headquartered in Denver, Colorado, the company's business model centers on franchise fees, annual dues, and broker fees generated by its global network of agents.
Recent financial performance reflects a challenging residential real estate environment. For the full year 2025, RE/MAX Holdings reported total revenue of $291.6 million, a decline of 5.2% compared to 2024. Revenue excluding marketing funds decreased 4.3%, driven by negative organic growth of 3.9%. Adjusted EBITDA came in at $93.7 million, down 4.1% year-over-year, though the Adjusted EBITDA margin held relatively firm at 32.1%.
A key metric for RE/MAX is agent count, and here the picture is mixed. Total global agent count reached a record 148,660 by year-end 2025, up 1.4% year-over-year, fueled by international growth of 7.9%. However, the combined U.S. and Canada agent count declined 4.6% to 72,977 agents, continuing a multi-quarter contraction trend. The company has introduced several strategic initiatives to stabilize its North American business, including new economic models for franchisees (Aspire, Ascend, and Appreciate), an AI-powered Marketing-as-a-Service platform, and a global referral system. In early 2026, RE/MAX completed its largest-ever brokerage conversion, bringing nearly 1,200 agents into its Canadian network. For full-year 2026, management has guided for revenue between $285 million and $305 million and Adjusted EBITDA between $90 million and $100 million, suggesting a cautious but stabilizing outlook.
In a market environment where real estate stocks can move sharply on economic data and interest rate expectations, many traders are turning to AI-driven tools to help navigate volatility. Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots designed to adapt to current market conditions. While Tickeron offers hundreds of AI trading bots covering thousands of tickers, only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing market dynamics earn a spot in this featured section. These bots span a wide range of trading styles — from swing trading and day trading to trend-following and mean-reversion strategies — across multiple timeframes, with some achieving annualized returns in excess of 70% and win rates above 60%. Each bot differs in its strategy, risk profile, and the set of tickers it trades, giving users the ability to explore diverse approaches. To see which bots are currently leading the pack, visit the Trending AI Robots page.
Although both NMRK and RMAX operate within the broad real estate sector, their business models, growth drivers, and risk profiles differ substantially.
Business Model: NMRK is a commercial real estate services firm that generates revenue through transaction-based fees (leasing, capital markets) and recurring streams (management services, servicing, valuation). RMAX is a franchise-based residential brokerage model that earns continuing franchise fees, annual dues, and broker fees from its agent network. NMRK's revenue is tied to commercial property deal flow; RMAX's revenue depends on agent count and home sales volume.
Growth Trajectory: NMRK has posted accelerating revenue growth — up 22.6% through the first nine months and 15.3% in Q4 of 2025 — with all growth described as organic. RMAX, by contrast, has been contracting, with full-year 2025 revenue down 5.2% and organic growth in negative territory for multiple quarters.
Market Sentiment and Risk: NMRK benefits from favorable macroeconomic conditions for commercial real estate, including rising transaction volumes, strong leasing activity, and demand for data-center and industrial assets. RMAX faces the headwind of elevated mortgage rates and a historically slow U.S. housing market, now in its third consecutive challenging year. However, RMAX's franchise model provides operational leverage, and signs of housing market stabilization could act as a catalyst.
Scale and Financial Profile: NMRK generated nearly $3.3 billion in 2025 revenue with a market capitalization around $2.8 billion, a P/E (Price-to-Earnings) ratio near 19, and a modest dividend yield. RMAX generated under $300 million in revenue with a market capitalization near $200–$330 million, a significantly elevated trailing P/E ratio, and no dividend. NMRK carries a net leverage ratio of approximately 1x, while RMAX holds over $436 million in debt against a smaller earnings base.
International Exposure: Both companies are expanding globally, but the context differs. NMRK's international expansion — including new offices in France, Germany, the U.K., Singapore, India, and South Korea — complements organic revenue gains. RMAX's international agent growth (up 7.9% in 2025) provides a needed offset to North American declines but has not yet translated into revenue growth.
Based on observable factors including trend consistency, revenue momentum, earnings trajectory, and relative market positioning, Tickeron's AI-driven analytical framework would likely favor NMRK in the current environment. The stock's pattern of consecutive double-digit revenue and earnings beats, expanding margins, consistent guidance raises, and strong organic growth across all business lines presents a clearer positive trend profile than what is currently visible in RMAX. While RMAX's international growth, strategic brand investments, and the potential for a housing market recovery offer a contrarian narrative, the prevailing data shows revenue contraction, declining North American agent count, and a more uncertain near-term catalyst path. This assessment reflects a probabilistic reading of the data and is not a prediction of future price movements. Market conditions can shift, and each stock carries distinct risk-reward characteristics that may appeal to different investor profiles.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NMRK’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRMAX’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
NMRK’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RMAX’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
NMRK (@Real Estate Development) experienced а -2.57% price change this week, while RMAX (@Real Estate Development) price change was -3.31% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was -1.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -10.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was -19.03%.
NMRK is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
RMAX is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.
Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.
| NMRK | RMAX | NMRK / RMAX | |
| Capitalization | 2.66B | 193M | 1,379% |
| EBITDA | 460M | 63M | 730% |
| Gain YTD | -13.007 | 19.368 | -67% |
| P/E Ratio | 18.74 | 453.00 | 4% |
| Revenue | 3.48B | 287M | 1,211% |
| Total Cash | 212M | 107M | 198% |
| Total Debt | 2.46B | 457M | 539% |
NMRK | RMAX | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 13 | 80 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 13 Undervalued | 97 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 81 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 72 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 95 | 1 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 35 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NMRK's Valuation (13) in the Real Estate Development industry is significantly better than the same rating for RMAX (97). This means that NMRK’s stock grew significantly faster than RMAX’s over the last 12 months.
NMRK's Profit vs Risk Rating (81) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as RMAX (100). This means that NMRK’s stock grew similarly to RMAX’s over the last 12 months.
NMRK's SMR Rating (72) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as RMAX (91). This means that NMRK’s stock grew similarly to RMAX’s over the last 12 months.
RMAX's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as NMRK (60). This means that RMAX’s stock grew similarly to NMRK’s over the last 12 months.
RMAX's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Real Estate Development industry is significantly better than the same rating for NMRK (95). This means that RMAX’s stock grew significantly faster than NMRK’s over the last 12 months.
| NMRK | RMAX | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 4 days ago 66% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 72% | 8 days ago 64% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 75% | 6 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 65% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MEMHX | 49.17 | 1.11 | +2.31% |
| MFS Emerging Markets Equity R4 | |||
| MTCIX | 82.52 | 0.60 | +0.73% |
| MFS Technology I | |||
| VLAAX | 33.67 | -0.12 | -0.36% |
| Value Line Asset Allocation Inv | |||
| IVFAX | 5.00 | -0.03 | -0.60% |
| Federated Hermes Intl Strat Val Div A | |||
| LKSMX | 11.75 | -0.08 | -0.68% |
| LKCM Small-Mid Cap Equity Institutional | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NMRK has been closely correlated with JLL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NMRK jumps, then JLL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NMRK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NMRK | 100% | -0.56% | ||
| JLL - NMRK | 82% Closely correlated | -1.85% | ||
| CBRE - NMRK | 81% Closely correlated | -1.77% | ||
| CWK - NMRK | 81% Closely correlated | -2.61% | ||
| CIGI - NMRK | 68% Closely correlated | -0.84% | ||
| MMI - NMRK | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.13% | ||
More | ||||