NTAP
Price
$117.92
Change
-$2.50 (-2.08%)
Updated
Oct 7, 04:12 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
24.04B
49 days until earnings call
QBTS
Price
$35.73
Change
+$0.71 (+2.03%)
Updated
Oct 7, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
11.98B
30 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

NTAP vs QBTS

Header iconNTAP vs QBTS Comparison
Open Charts NTAP vs QBTSBanner chart's image
NetApp
Price$117.92
Change-$2.50 (-2.08%)
Volume$300
Capitalization24.04B
D-Wave Quantum
Price$35.73
Change+$0.71 (+2.03%)
Volume$168.15K
Capitalization11.98B
NTAP vs QBTS Comparison Chart in %
NTAP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QBTS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NTAP vs. QBTS commentary
Oct 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NTAP is a StrongBuy and QBTS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 07, 2025
Stock price -- (NTAP: $120.42 vs. QBTS: $35.02)
Brand notoriety: NTAP: Notable vs. QBTS: Not notable
NTAP represents the Computer Communications, while QBTS is part of the Computer Processing Hardware industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NTAP: 80% vs. QBTS: 154%
Market capitalization -- NTAP: $24.04B vs. QBTS: $11.98B
NTAP [@Computer Communications] is valued at $24.04B. QBTS’s [@Computer Processing Hardware] market capitalization is $11.98B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.93T to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Processing Hardware] industry ranges from $187.9B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $28.14B. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Processing Hardware] industry is $13.67B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NTAP’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileQBTS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • NTAP’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • QBTS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, NTAP is a better buy in the long-term than QBTS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NTAP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QBTS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NTAP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • QBTS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, QBTS is a better buy in the short-term than NTAP.

Price Growth

NTAP (@Computer Communications) experienced а +2.00% price change this week, while QBTS (@Computer Processing Hardware) price change was +38.36% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +3.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was +66.26%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Processing Hardware industry was +7.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +27.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +103.65%.

Reported Earning Dates

NTAP is expected to report earnings on Nov 25, 2025.

QBTS is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Computer Communications (+3.24% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

@Computer Processing Hardware (+7.25% weekly)

Computer Processing Hardware industry produces central processing unit, monitor, keyboard, computer data storage devices, and graphics card. Business activity and economic growth are potential drivers of this industry – if more businesses are growing or flourishing, so would their investments in computer equipment. Dell Technologies, Inc, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co., NCR Corporation are key producers of computer processing hardware.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NTAP($24B) has a higher market cap than QBTS($12B). QBTS YTD gains are higher at: 316.905 vs. NTAP (5.842). NTAP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.7B vs. QBTS (-277.43M). QBTS has more cash in the bank: 819M vs. NTAP (671M). QBTS has less debt than NTAP: QBTS (40M) vs NTAP (2.75B). NTAP has higher revenues than QBTS: NTAP (6.59B) vs QBTS (22.3M).
NTAPQBTSNTAP / QBTS
Capitalization24B12B200%
EBITDA1.7B-277.43M-611%
Gain YTD5.842316.9052%
P/E Ratio21.31N/A-
Revenue6.59B22.3M29,552%
Total Cash671M819M82%
Total Debt2.75B40M6,863%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NTAP: Fundamental Ratings
NTAP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
64
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
33
SMR RATING
1..100
12
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
46
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
58
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
14

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NTAPQBTS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NTAP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QBTS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DGP139.555.62
+4.20%
DB Gold Double Long ETN
HACK88.120.70
+0.80%
Amplify Cybersecurity ETF
BFIX25.390.05
+0.19%
Build Bond Innovation ETF
MFDX37.340.06
+0.16%
PIMCO RAFI Dyn Multi-Factor Intl Eq ETF
HERZ2.43-0.01
-0.21%
Herzfeld Credit Income Fund Inc