QCOM
Price
$137.51
Change
+$1.31 (+0.96%)
Updated
Apr 20, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
146.73B
9 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TSM
Price
$366.29
Change
-$4.21 (-1.14%)
Updated
Apr 20, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.67T
87 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

QCOM vs TSM

Header iconQCOM vs TSM Comparison
Open Charts QCOM vs TSMBanner chart's image
QCOM vs TSM Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) vs. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSM) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • QCOM has declined about 21% year-to-date amid concerns over potential loss of Apple's modem business and analyst downgrades, while TSM has surged roughly 34% in six months on robust AI chip demand.
  • TSM reports strong revenue growth, with January-February 2026 sales up 30% year-over-year, driven by advanced nodes for AI accelerators, contrasting QCOM's softer handset outlook due to memory shortages.
  • Analyst sentiment favors TSM with strong buy ratings and EPS growth projections over 50%, while QCOM faces underperform calls from firms like Bank of America.
  • Both stocks benefit from AI trends, but TSM's foundry dominance provides broader exposure, whereas QCOM emphasizes edge AI and automotive growth amid competitive pressures.
  • Market caps highlight scale: TSM at ~$1.8T vs. QCOM at ~$150B, with QCOM offering a higher dividend yield around 2.5%.

Introduction

QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSM) represent pivotal players in the semiconductor ecosystem, with QCOM focusing on wireless technologies and chip design, and TSM leading as the world's premier contract manufacturer. This stock comparison analyzes their recent market performance, growth drivers, and positioning amid AI demand and supply chain dynamics. Traders seeking momentum in tech and investors eyeing long-term sector exposure will find insights into relative strengths, risks, and sentiment shifts valuable for portfolio decisions in the current environment.

QCOM Overview and Recent Performance

QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) designs semiconductors and wireless technologies, powering smartphones, automotive systems, and IoT devices through its Snapdragon platforms and modem IP. In recent market activity, QCOM shares have faced downward pressure, declining approximately 21% year-to-date and 25.8% over the past 90 days. Key influences include Bank of America's Underperform rating with a $145 target, citing modest revenue/EPS growth through 2028 and risks from potentially losing Apple's modem business by 2027. Memory shortages have constrained handset production, leading to softer Q2 guidance of $10.2-11 billion. Despite this, partnerships in edge AI, robotics, and 6G offer counterbalances, with automotive revenues up 61% in recent quarters. Sentiment reflects caution amid U.S.-China trade tensions and competition, though some view the stock as undervalued at a forward P/E around 28.

TSM Overview and Recent Performance

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSM), the global leader in contract chip manufacturing, produces advanced nodes for clients including Apple, Nvidia, AMD, and QCOM. Recent performance has been robust, with shares rising about 34% over six months and 2.15% in the latest session amid market dips. January-February 2026 revenues jumped 30% year-over-year to NT$718.91 billion, fueled by AI infrastructure demand, where advanced processes (7nm and below) account for 77% of wafer revenue. February sales rose 22.2% YoY despite monthly softening. Analysts project over 50% EPS growth, with capex at $52-56 billion targeting 2nm tech. Geopolitical risks linger due to Taiwan exposure, but U.S. and Japan expansions mitigate concerns. Trading at a forward P/E near 26, TSM's market cap exceeds $1.8 trillion, underscoring its foundry dominance.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the platform's top-performing AI trading bots from hundreds available, which collectively trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies like trend following, volatility plays, and sector rotations in semiconductors, aerospace, and energy. Only bots excelling in current market conditions—such as AI-driven momentum and volatility—earn a spot, with stats like annualized returns up to +216%, win rates of 53-95%, and profit factors reaching 25.83 showcased transparently. Timeframes vary from 5-minute scalps to 60-day swings, using AI/ML for technical/fundamental signals. Examples include semiconductor-focused bots with +90-100% returns and 60-70% win rates on tickers like SOXL and LRCX. Explore these for data-driven insights and consider subscribing to align with prevailing trends.

Head-to-Head Comparison

QCOM and TSM operate complementarily—QCOM as a fabless designer licensing IP, TSM as a pure-play foundry—but diverge in growth drivers and risks. TSM leverages AI hyperscaler demand for its 90% share of advanced nodes, posting 30%+ revenue growth, versus QCOM's exposure to cyclical handsets (hit by memory issues) and modem risks. Recent momentum strongly favors TSM (YTD +14% vs. QCOM -21%), with superior EPS projections. Risks for TSM center on geopolitics and capex intensity; QCOM faces client concentration and trade curbs. Sector-wise, both tap semis/AI, but TSM has broader exposure. Sentiment tilts bullish on TSM via upgrades, while QCOM contends with downgrades, trading at a valuation discount offering income appeal.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors TSM over QCOM, based on superior trend consistency from AI revenue surges, higher stability in foundry leadership, and stronger catalysts like 30%+ growth guidance. TSM's relative positioning amid semis momentum suggests probabilistic outperformance, though QCOM could rebound on edge AI execution.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.

VS
QCOM vs. TSM commentary
Apr 21, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCOM is a Hold and TSM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 21, 2026
Stock price -- (QCOM: $136.20 vs. TSM: $370.50)
Brand notoriety: QCOM and TSM are both notable
Both companies represent the Semiconductors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: QCOM: 94% vs. TSM: 139%
Market capitalization -- QCOM: $145.33B vs. TSM: $1.67T
QCOM [@Semiconductors] is valued at $145.33B. TSM’s [@Semiconductors] market capitalization is $1.67T. The market cap for tickers in the [@Semiconductors] industry ranges from $4.9T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Semiconductors] industry is $122.84B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

QCOM’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTSM’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • QCOM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TSM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, TSM is a better buy in the long-term than QCOM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

QCOM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TSM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • QCOM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TSM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, QCOM is a better buy in the short-term than TSM.

Price Growth

QCOM (@Semiconductors) experienced а +6.36% price change this week, while TSM (@Semiconductors) price change was -0.03% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +10.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +24.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +26.97%.

Reported Earning Dates

QCOM is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2026.

TSM is expected to report earnings on Jul 16, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Semiconductors (+10.10% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TSM($1.67T) has a higher market cap than QCOM($147B). TSM has higher P/E ratio than QCOM: TSM (31.34) vs QCOM (27.73). TSM YTD gains are higher at: 21.192 vs. QCOM (-19.086). TSM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.74T vs. QCOM (14.8B). TSM has higher revenues than QCOM: TSM (3.81T) vs QCOM (44.9B).
QCOMTSMQCOM / TSM
Capitalization147B1.67T9%
EBITDA14.8B2.74T1%
Gain YTD-19.08621.192-90%
P/E Ratio27.7331.3488%
Revenue44.9B3.81T1%
Total Cash11.8BN/A-
Total Debt14.8BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
QCOM vs TSM: Fundamental Ratings
QCOM
TSM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
46
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
879
SMR RATING
1..100
4326
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6139
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1420
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

QCOM's Valuation (9) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TSM (46) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that QCOM’s stock grew somewhat faster than TSM’s over the last 12 months.

TSM's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Semiconductors industry is significantly better than the same rating for QCOM (87) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that TSM’s stock grew significantly faster than QCOM’s over the last 12 months.

TSM's SMR Rating (26) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as QCOM (43) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that TSM’s stock grew similarly to QCOM’s over the last 12 months.

TSM's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as QCOM (61) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that TSM’s stock grew similarly to QCOM’s over the last 12 months.

QCOM's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as TSM (20) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that QCOM’s stock grew similarly to TSM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QCOMTSM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
QCOM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TSM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QQQD12.990.13
+1.01%
Direxion Daily Concentrated Qs Bear 1X Shares
XLEI25.800.04
+0.17%
State Street®EngySelSectSPDR®PrmETF
VTI350.21-0.32
-0.09%
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
QLV74.08-0.32
-0.43%
FlexShares US Quality Low Vol ETF
JETS27.55-0.37
-1.33%
US Global Jets ETF

QCOM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QCOM has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QCOM jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QCOM
1D Price
Change %
QCOM100%
+0.97%
LRCX - QCOM
80%
Closely correlated
-1.66%
KLAC - QCOM
78%
Closely correlated
+0.77%
AMKR - QCOM
76%
Closely correlated
+3.07%
AMAT - QCOM
74%
Closely correlated
-1.34%
KLIC - QCOM
74%
Closely correlated
+1.78%
More

TSM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TSM has been closely correlated with ASML. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TSM jumps, then ASML could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TSM
1D Price
Change %
TSM100%
-1.15%
ASML - TSM
74%
Closely correlated
+1.14%
LRCX - TSM
73%
Closely correlated
-1.66%
KLAC - TSM
71%
Closely correlated
+0.77%
MPWR - TSM
71%
Closely correlated
+1.53%
NVDA - TSM
71%
Closely correlated
+0.19%
More