SKYQ
Price
$1.17
Change
+$0.03 (+2.63%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Capitalization
5.61M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SU
Price
$55.33
Change
-$0.95 (-1.69%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Capitalization
65.39B
51 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SKYQ vs SU

SKYQ vs SU Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SKYQ vs. SU commentary
Jun 21, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SKYQ is a Hold and SU is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 21, 2026
Stock price -- (SKYQ: $1.17 vs. SU: $55.33)
Brand notoriety: SKYQ: Not notable vs. SU: Notable
Both companies represent the Integrated Oil industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SKYQ: 21% vs. SU: 252%
Market capitalization -- SKYQ: $5.61M vs. SU: $65.39B
SKYQ [@Integrated Oil] is valued at $5.61M. SU’s [@Integrated Oil] market capitalization is $65.39B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Integrated Oil] industry ranges from $571.22B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Integrated Oil] industry is $106.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SKYQ’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSU’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • SKYQ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SU’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, SU is a better buy in the long-term than SKYQ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SKYQ’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SU’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SKYQ’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • SU’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SKYQ is a better buy in the short-term than SU.

Price Growth

SKYQ (@Integrated Oil) experienced а -19.86% price change this week, while SU (@Integrated Oil) price change was -10.47% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Integrated Oil industry was -7.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -12.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.63%.

Reported Earning Dates

SU is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Integrated Oil (-7.95% weekly)

Integrated oil companies are involved across nearly the entire oil value chain – from upstream operations like exploration and production, to downstream functions of refining and marketing. Exxon Mobil Corporation, Chevron Corporation and BP are major integrated oil companies. Their bottom lines’ response to crude oil prices could depend on the proportion of upstream vs. downstream businesses; for example, if a company has substantial downstream business, the adverse impact on their upstream business due to falling crude prices could be mitigated by benefits to its downstream business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SU($65.4B) has a higher market cap than SKYQ($5.61M). SKYQ has higher P/E ratio than SU: SKYQ (24.00) vs SU (14.72). SU YTD gains are higher at: 24.729 vs. SKYQ (-34.564). SU has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 16.2B vs. SKYQ (-7.3M). SU has more cash in the bank: 3.27B vs. SKYQ (66.8K). SKYQ has less debt than SU: SKYQ (11.4M) vs SU (14.8B). SU has higher revenues than SKYQ: SU (54.5B) vs SKYQ (6.16M).
SKYQSUSKYQ / SU
Capitalization5.61M65.4B0%
EBITDA-7.3M16.2B-0%
Gain YTD-34.56424.729-140%
P/E Ratio24.0014.72163%
Revenue6.16M54.5B0%
Total Cash66.8K3.27B0%
Total Debt11.4M14.8B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SU: Fundamental Ratings
SU
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
55
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
23
SMR RATING
1..100
61
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
59
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
29
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SKYQSU
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SKYQ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SU
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SVRA5.500.12
+2.23%
Savara
NAMI0.25N/A
+1.13%
Jinxin Technology Holding Co
BLCO14.870.01
+0.07%
Bausch + Lomb Corp
MRBK19.25-0.02
-0.10%
Meridian Corp
TRP67.70-0.22
-0.32%
TC Energy Corp

SKYQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SKYQ and SU have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SKYQ and SU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SKYQ
1D Price
Change %
SKYQ100%
+2.63%
SU - SKYQ
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.69%
SHEL - SKYQ
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.95%
EQNR - SKYQ
-1%
Poorly correlated
-4.09%
NFG - SKYQ
-2%
Poorly correlated
-0.07%
PBR - SKYQ
-2%
Poorly correlated
-0.24%
More

SU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SU has been closely correlated with CVE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SU jumps, then CVE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SU
1D Price
Change %
SU100%
-1.69%
CVE - SU
81%
Closely correlated
-1.72%
IMO - SU
79%
Closely correlated
-1.44%
EQNR - SU
72%
Closely correlated
-4.09%
CRGY - SU
71%
Closely correlated
-3.15%
BP - SU
70%
Closely correlated
-2.59%
More