SU
Price
$39.49
Change
-$0.68 (-1.69%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
48.23B
79 days until earnings call
TGS
Price
$27.42
Change
-$0.87 (-3.08%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
2.31B
4 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

SU vs TGS

Header iconSU vs TGS Comparison
Open Charts SU vs TGSBanner chart's image
Suncor Energy
Price$39.49
Change-$0.68 (-1.69%)
Volume$2.91M
Capitalization48.23B
Transportadora de Gas del Sur SA
Price$27.42
Change-$0.87 (-3.08%)
Volume$128.2K
Capitalization2.31B
SU vs TGS Comparison Chart
Loading...
SU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TGS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SU vs. TGS commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SU is a Hold and TGS is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (SU: $39.49 vs. TGS: $27.42)
Brand notoriety: SU: Notable vs. TGS: Not notable
Both companies represent the Integrated Oil industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SU: 68% vs. TGS: 37%
Market capitalization -- SU: $48.23B vs. TGS: $2.31B
SU [@Integrated Oil] is valued at $48.23B. TGS’s [@Integrated Oil] market capitalization is $2.31B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Integrated Oil] industry ranges from $461.22B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Integrated Oil] industry is $63.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SU’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTGS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SU’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TGS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SU is a better buy in the long-term than TGS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SU’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TGS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SU’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TGS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SU is a better buy in the short-term than TGS.

Price Growth

SU (@Integrated Oil) experienced а -0.18% price change this week, while TGS (@Integrated Oil) price change was +0.55% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Integrated Oil industry was -1.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.99%.

Reported Earning Dates

SU is expected to report earnings on May 13, 2025.

TGS is expected to report earnings on May 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Integrated Oil (-1.41% weekly)

Integrated oil companies are involved across nearly the entire oil value chain – from upstream operations like exploration and production, to downstream functions of refining and marketing. Exxon Mobil Corporation, Chevron Corporation and BP are major integrated oil companies. Their bottom lines’ response to crude oil prices could depend on the proportion of upstream vs. downstream businesses; for example, if a company has substantial downstream business, the adverse impact on their upstream business due to falling crude prices could be mitigated by benefits to its downstream business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SU($48.2B) has a higher market cap than TGS($2.31B). TGS has higher P/E ratio than SU: TGS (241.29) vs SU (7.96). SU YTD gains are higher at: 10.678 vs. TGS (-6.320). TGS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 49.7B vs. SU (17.8B). TGS has more cash in the bank: 164B vs. SU (1.73B). SU has less debt than TGS: SU (15.4B) vs TGS (201B). TGS has higher revenues than SU: TGS (139B) vs SU (52.2B).
SUTGSSU / TGS
Capitalization48.2B2.31B2,087%
EBITDA17.8B49.7B36%
Gain YTD10.678-6.320-169%
P/E Ratio7.96241.293%
Revenue52.2B139B38%
Total Cash1.73B164B1%
Total Debt15.4B201B8%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SU vs TGS: Fundamental Ratings
SU
TGS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4275
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
85
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
637
SMR RATING
1..100
4958
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5442
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
12100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SU's Valuation (35) in the Integrated Oil industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TGS (85) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry. This means that SU’s stock grew somewhat faster than TGS’s over the last 12 months.

TGS's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SU (63) in the Integrated Oil industry. This means that TGS’s stock grew somewhat faster than SU’s over the last 12 months.

SU's SMR Rating (49) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as TGS (58) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry. This means that SU’s stock grew similarly to TGS’s over the last 12 months.

TGS's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry is in the same range as SU (54) in the Integrated Oil industry. This means that TGS’s stock grew similarly to SU’s over the last 12 months.

SU's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the Integrated Oil industry is significantly better than the same rating for TGS (100) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry. This means that SU’s stock grew significantly faster than TGS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SUTGS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 27 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TGS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GSIMX20.75-0.17
-0.81%
Goldman Sachs GQG Ptnrs Intl Opps Instl
RGIAX9.35-0.09
-0.95%
Russell Inv Global Infrastructure A
EAALX21.30-0.21
-0.98%
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital Focused Gr A
NDVBX16.56-0.35
-2.07%
MFS New Discovery Value B
ALSRX16.15-0.61
-3.64%
Alger Small Cap Growth Institutional I

SU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SU has been closely correlated with IMO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SU jumps, then IMO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SU
1D Price
Change %
SU100%
-1.69%
IMO - SU
79%
Closely correlated
-4.37%
CVE - SU
75%
Closely correlated
-4.58%
SHEL - SU
67%
Closely correlated
-2.46%
XOM - SU
67%
Closely correlated
-1.17%
CVX - SU
65%
Loosely correlated
-1.18%
More

TGS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TGS has been closely correlated with YPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TGS jumps, then YPF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TGS
1D Price
Change %
TGS100%
-3.08%
YPF - TGS
75%
Closely correlated
-3.46%
EC - TGS
41%
Loosely correlated
-4.66%
E - TGS
34%
Loosely correlated
-1.52%
IMO - TGS
30%
Poorly correlated
-4.37%
SU - TGS
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.69%
More