TGLS
Price
$39.69
Change
-$0.73 (-1.81%)
Updated
Sep 9 closing price
Capitalization
1.76B
60 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TTAM
Price
$14.80
Change
-$0.52 (-3.39%)
Updated
Sep 9 closing price
Capitalization
2.73B
62 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

TGLS vs TTAM

TGLS vs TTAM Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
TGLS vs. TTAM commentary
Sep 10, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TGLS is a Hold and TTAM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 10, 2026
Stock price -- (TGLS: $39.69 vs. TTAM: $14.80)
Brand notoriety: TGLS and TTAM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: TGLS: 136% vs. TTAM: 176%
Market capitalization -- TGLS: $1.76B vs. TTAM: $2.73B
TGLS [@Construction Materials] is valued at $1.76B. TTAM’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $2.73B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $59.44B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $11.94B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

TGLS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTTAM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • TGLS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TTAM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TTAM is a better buy in the long-term than TGLS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

TGLS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TTAM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • TGLS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • TTAM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TTAM is a better buy in the short-term than TGLS.

Price Growth

TGLS (@Construction Materials) experienced а +3.04% price change this week, while TTAM (@Construction Materials) price change was -0.54% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -7.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -14.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.01%.

Reported Earning Dates

TGLS is expected to report earnings on Nov 09, 2026.

TTAM is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (-7.50% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TTAM($2.73B) has a higher market cap than TGLS($1.76B). TTAM has higher P/E ratio than TGLS: TTAM (15.42) vs TGLS (13.93). TTAM YTD gains are higher at: -9.773 vs. TGLS (-20.592). TTAM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 378M vs. TGLS (247M). TGLS has more cash in the bank: 84.3M vs. TTAM (65.7M). TGLS has less debt than TTAM: TGLS (225M) vs TTAM (574M). TTAM has higher revenues than TGLS: TTAM (1.71B) vs TGLS (1.05B).
TGLSTTAMTGLS / TTAM
Capitalization1.76B2.73B65%
EBITDA247M378M65%
Gain YTD-20.592-9.773211%
P/E Ratio13.9315.4290%
Revenue1.05B1.71B61%
Total Cash84.3M65.7M128%
Total Debt225M574M39%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TGLS: Fundamental Ratings
TGLS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
55
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
77
SMR RATING
1..100
52
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
74
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
71
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
26

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
TGLSTTAM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
TGLS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TTAM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AMZO14.410.50
+3.59%
Tradr 2X Short AMZN Daily ETF
PICK66.370.24
+0.36%
iShares MSCI Global Mtls&Mng Prdcrs ETF
KEAT34.670.05
+0.13%
Keating Active ETF
MAYW35.35-0.05
-0.14%
AllianzIM US Equity Buffer20 May ETF
KSEP31.18-0.22
-0.70%
Innovator U.S. Small Cp Pwr Buf ETF -Sep

TGLS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TGLS has been loosely correlated with BCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TGLS jumps, then BCC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TGLS
1D Price
Change %
TGLS100%
-1.81%
BCC - TGLS
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.21%
EXP - TGLS
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.92%
VMC - TGLS
50%
Loosely correlated
-3.26%
AMRZ - TGLS
45%
Loosely correlated
-2.34%
TTAM - TGLS
42%
Loosely correlated
-3.39%
More

TTAM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TTAM has been closely correlated with EXP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TTAM jumps, then EXP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TTAM
1D Price
Change %
TTAM100%
-3.39%
EXP - TTAM
69%
Closely correlated
-1.92%
MLM - TTAM
66%
Loosely correlated
-1.76%
CRH - TTAM
65%
Loosely correlated
-1.39%
VMC - TTAM
60%
Loosely correlated
-3.26%
AMRZ - TTAM
59%
Loosely correlated
-2.34%
More