TGS
Price
$28.12
Change
+$0.08 (+0.29%)
Updated
Aug 12, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.22B
89 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
YPF
Price
$48.86
Change
-$0.29 (-0.59%)
Updated
Aug 12, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
19.27B
86 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

TGS vs YPF

TGS vs YPF Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 10, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.A. (TGS) vs. YPF Sociedad Anónima (YPF) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.A. (TGS) operates primarily as a midstream natural gas transporter in Argentina, while YPF Sociedad Anónima (YPF) functions as a fully integrated oil and gas company with upstream, midstream, and downstream operations.
  • Both stocks have shown resilience amid Argentina's energy sector dynamics, with TGS benefiting from steady gas transportation demand and YPF advancing through asset optimization and shale developments in recent market activity.
  • Recent performance reflects sector exposure, with TGS demonstrating stability in pipeline utilization and YPF highlighting momentum from portfolio adjustments including conventional asset sales.
  • Risk factors for both include Argentine economic conditions, regulatory environment, and commodity price volatility, though their business models present differing sensitivities to upstream versus transportation segments.
  • Market sentiment appears constructive for energy infrastructure and production plays, supported by broader regional developments in natural gas and oil output.
  • Relative positioning favors complementary exposure, with TGS offering transport-focused stability and YPF providing integrated growth catalysts tied to exploration and refining.

Introduction

Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.A. (TGS) and YPF Sociedad Anónima (YPF) represent two key players in Argentina's energy landscape, making them relevant for comparison in the current market environment. TGS focuses on natural gas transportation infrastructure, while YPF encompasses a broader integrated model spanning exploration, production, refining, and marketing. This analysis appeals to traders and investors seeking exposure to Latin American energy equities, particularly those evaluating midstream stability versus upstream and downstream opportunities amid evolving regional supply dynamics and commodity trends.

TGS Overview and Recent Performance

Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.A. (TGS) is Argentina's leading natural gas transporter, operating the largest pipeline system in Latin America and handling a significant portion of the country's gas consumption. The company also engages in liquids production and midstream services. In recent market activity, TGS shares have exhibited resilience, crossing above their 200-day moving average amid steady demand for gas transportation. Factors influencing performance include consistent pipeline utilization and broader energy infrastructure needs in Argentina, contributing to measured gains without sharp volatility in the recent period.

YPF Overview and Recent Performance

YPF Sociedad Anónima (YPF) is a vertically integrated energy company engaged in oil and gas exploration, production, refining, and commercialization, with significant operations in the Vaca Muerta shale formation. Recent market activity has featured portfolio optimization through sales of conventional assets and liability management actions such as bond redemptions. The stock has traded in a range reflecting these developments alongside upcoming quarterly results, with year-to-date gains supported by operational focus on core shale assets and liquidity-enhancing measures like a recent share split on the local exchange.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron maintains a curated Trending AI Robots section that highlights select AI trading bots from a broader library of hundreds available across thousands of tickers. Only those demonstrating strong suitability for prevailing market conditions, including consistent performance metrics, risk-adjusted returns, and alignment with current volatility and trend environments, earn placement in this featured area. Available bots span diverse trading styles, strategies, timeframes, and ticker sets, with historical statistics often showing win rates in the 55-75% range and varying drawdown profiles depending on the model. This section serves as a resource for users exploring automated approaches tailored to equities like those in the energy sector. Explore the full selection at the Trending AI Robots page for detailed bot specifications and backtested data.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.A. (TGS) and YPF Sociedad Anónima (YPF) differ markedly in business models: TGS centers on regulated midstream gas transportation with predictable fee-based revenue, whereas YPF integrates upstream production, refining, and marketing, exposing it more directly to commodity prices and exploration outcomes. Growth drivers contrast accordingly, with TGS tied to Argentina's expanding gas infrastructure needs and YPF benefiting from shale resource development and asset streamlining. Recent momentum has favored TGS through infrastructure stability, while YPF has advanced via targeted divestitures and operational refinements. Risk factors include shared exposure to Argentine macroeconomic conditions and regulations, though TGS faces lower upstream volatility and YPF contends with production variability. Sector exposure remains energy-centric for both, yet market sentiment reflects complementary roles within the same national energy ecosystem.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors such as trend consistency in transportation volumes for TGS and catalysts from portfolio adjustments at YPF, Tickeron’s AI models currently assign a modestly higher probabilistic preference to Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.A. (TGS) for relative stability in the prevailing environment, while recognizing YPF's positioning for potential upside tied to integrated operations.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations
VS
TGS vs. YPF commentary
Aug 13, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TGS is a StrongBuy and YPF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 13, 2026
Stock price -- (TGS: $28.04 vs. YPF: $49.15)
Brand notoriety: TGS: Not notable vs. YPF: Notable
Both companies represent the Integrated Oil industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: TGS: 132% vs. YPF: 152%
Market capitalization -- TGS: $4.22B vs. YPF: $19.27B
TGS [@Integrated Oil] is valued at $4.22B. YPF’s [@Integrated Oil] market capitalization is $19.27B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Integrated Oil] industry ranges from $657.08B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Integrated Oil] industry is $118.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

TGS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileYPF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • TGS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • YPF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, YPF is a better buy in the long-term than TGS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

TGS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while YPF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • TGS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • YPF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, YPF is a better buy in the short-term than TGS.

Price Growth

TGS (@Integrated Oil) experienced а -6.66% price change this week, while YPF (@Integrated Oil) price change was -0.99% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Integrated Oil industry was +3.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.29%.

Reported Earning Dates

TGS is expected to report earnings on Nov 09, 2026.

YPF is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Integrated Oil (+3.35% weekly)

Integrated oil companies are involved across nearly the entire oil value chain – from upstream operations like exploration and production, to downstream functions of refining and marketing. Exxon Mobil Corporation, Chevron Corporation and BP are major integrated oil companies. Their bottom lines’ response to crude oil prices could depend on the proportion of upstream vs. downstream businesses; for example, if a company has substantial downstream business, the adverse impact on their upstream business due to falling crude prices could be mitigated by benefits to its downstream business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
YPF($19.3B) has a higher market cap than TGS($4.22B). TGS has higher P/E ratio than YPF: TGS (14.37) vs YPF (1.27). YPF YTD gains are higher at: 35.924 vs. TGS (-9.810). TGS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.01T vs. YPF (5.6B). TGS has more cash in the bank: 1.81T vs. YPF (1.69B). YPF has less debt than TGS: YPF (10.8B) vs TGS (1.57T). TGS has higher revenues than YPF: TGS (1.76T) vs YPF (18.6B).
TGSYPFTGS / YPF
Capitalization4.22B19.3B22%
EBITDA1.01T5.6B17,974%
Gain YTD-9.81035.924-27%
P/E Ratio14.371.271,134%
Revenue1.76T18.6B9,484%
Total Cash1.81T1.69B106,738%
Total Debt1.57T10.8B14,546%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TGS vs YPF: Fundamental Ratings
TGS
YPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5483
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
58
Fair valued
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2323
SMR RATING
1..100
4993
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5941
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
53100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

YPF's Valuation (17) in the Integrated Oil industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TGS (58) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry. This means that YPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TGS’s over the last 12 months.

YPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as TGS (23) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry. This means that YPF’s stock grew similarly to TGS’s over the last 12 months.

TGS's SMR Rating (49) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for YPF (93) in the Integrated Oil industry. This means that TGS’s stock grew somewhat faster than YPF’s over the last 12 months.

YPF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as TGS (59) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry. This means that YPF’s stock grew similarly to TGS’s over the last 12 months.

TGS's P/E Growth Rating (53) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for YPF (100) in the Integrated Oil industry. This means that TGS’s stock grew somewhat faster than YPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
TGSYPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
TGS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
YPF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BKU47.000.74
+1.60%
Bankunited
TMQ3.930.05
+1.29%
Trilogy Metals
MKL1841.040.96
+0.05%
Markel Group
RVSB5.30N/A
N/A
Riverview Bancorp
GCDT0.42-0.04
-8.87%
Green Circle Decarbonize Technology Ltd

TGS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TGS has been closely correlated with YPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TGS jumps, then YPF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TGS
1D Price
Change %
TGS100%
-4.37%
YPF - TGS
84%
Closely correlated
-3.51%
CRGY - TGS
35%
Loosely correlated
+1.72%
PBR - TGS
30%
Poorly correlated
-2.18%
EC - TGS
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.23%
CVE - TGS
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.95%
More

YPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, YPF has been closely correlated with TGS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if YPF jumps, then TGS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To YPF
1D Price
Change %
YPF100%
-3.51%
TGS - YPF
84%
Closely correlated
-4.37%
CRGY - YPF
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.72%
EC - YPF
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.23%
PBR - YPF
40%
Loosely correlated
-2.18%
CVE - YPF
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.95%
More