THRY
Price
$4.30
Change
+$0.12 (+2.87%)
Updated
Jul 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
190.26M
24 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
ZM
Price
$87.11
Change
-$3.02 (-3.35%)
Updated
Jul 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
25.55B
50 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

THRY vs ZM

THRY vs ZM Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
THRY vs. ZM commentary
Jul 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is THRY is a Hold and ZM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 05, 2026
Stock price -- (THRY: $4.18 vs. ZM: $86.48)
Brand notoriety: THRY: Not notable vs. ZM: Notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: THRY: 227% vs. ZM: 78%
Market capitalization -- THRY: $190.26M vs. ZM: $25.55B
THRY [@Packaged Software] is valued at $190.26M. ZM’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $25.55B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $195.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

THRY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileZM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • THRY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ZM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both THRY and ZM are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

THRY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • THRY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • ZM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, THRY is a better buy in the short-term than ZM.

Price Growth

THRY (@Packaged Software) experienced а +12.97% price change this week, while ZM (@Packaged Software) price change was +4.34% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +5.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.98%.

Reported Earning Dates

THRY is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.

ZM is expected to report earnings on Aug 24, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+5.46% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ZM($25.6B) has a higher market cap than THRY($190M). ZM has higher P/E ratio than THRY: ZM (12.42) vs THRY (10.21). ZM YTD gains are higher at: 0.220 vs. THRY (-30.909). ZM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.32B vs. THRY (97.5M). ZM has more cash in the bank: 7.72B vs. THRY (7.95M). ZM has less debt than THRY: ZM (60.2M) vs THRY (259M). ZM has higher revenues than THRY: ZM (4.93B) vs THRY (771M).
THRYZMTHRY / ZM
Capitalization190M25.6B1%
EBITDA97.5M1.32B7%
Gain YTD-30.9090.220-14,037%
P/E Ratio10.2112.4282%
Revenue771M4.93B16%
Total Cash7.95M7.72B0%
Total Debt259M60.2M430%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
THRY vs ZM: Fundamental Ratings
THRY
ZM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
8143
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5261
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8391
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

THRY's Valuation (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ZM (84) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that THRY’s stock grew somewhat faster than ZM’s over the last 12 months.

THRY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as ZM (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that THRY’s stock grew similarly to ZM’s over the last 12 months.

ZM's SMR Rating (43) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for THRY (81) in the null industry. This means that ZM’s stock grew somewhat faster than THRY’s over the last 12 months.

THRY's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as ZM (61) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that THRY’s stock grew similarly to ZM’s over the last 12 months.

THRY's P/E Growth Rating (83) in the null industry is in the same range as ZM (91) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that THRY’s stock grew similarly to ZM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
THRYZM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
THRY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ZM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PPG125.332.72
+2.22%
PPG Industries
DYN20.94N/A
N/A
Dyne Therapeutics
CPOP0.09N/A
N/A
Pop Culture Group Co Ltd
FIRY9.74-0.08
-0.81%
Firy Inc
SMBK47.34-0.82
-1.70%
SmartFinancial

THRY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, THRY has been loosely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if THRY jumps, then META could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To THRY
1D Price
Change %
THRY100%
N/A
META - THRY
55%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ZM - THRY
42%
Loosely correlated
N/A
OPRA - THRY
41%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PINS - THRY
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.82%
CARG - THRY
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More