Advertisement
AMAT or QCOM or TSM
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AMAT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileQCOM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and TSM’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).
- AMAT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- QCOM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- TSM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AMAT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QCOM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and TSM’s TA Score reflects 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AMAT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- QCOM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- TSM’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
AMAT (@Semiconductors) experienced а -3.07% price change this week, while QCOM (@Semiconductors) price change was -6.45% , and TSM (@Semiconductors) price fluctuated -4.23% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was -5.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.72%.
Reported Earning Dates
AMAT is expected to report earnings on Nov 13, 2025.
QCOM is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.
TSM is expected to report earnings on Oct 16, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Semiconductors (-5.34% weekly)The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.
| AMAT | QCOM | TSM | |
| Capitalization | 173B | 160B | 1.01T |
| EBITDA | 8.78B | 14.6B | 2.26T |
| Gain YTD | 11.245 | -2.432 | 20.450 |
| P/E Ratio | 24.55 | 14.30 | 28.14 |
| Revenue | 26.5B | 43.3B | 3.14T |
| Total Cash | 7.49B | 10B | 2.63T |
| Total Debt | 5.99B | 14.8B | N/A |
AMAT | QCOM | TSM | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 76 | 62 | 77 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 51 Fair valued | 17 Undervalued | 48 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 44 | 55 | 16 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 27 | 22 | 31 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 55 | 61 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 85 | 61 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
QCOM's Valuation (17) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as TSM (48) in the Semiconductors industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for AMAT (51) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that QCOM's stock grew similarly to TSM’s and somewhat faster than AMAT’s over the last 12 months.
TSM's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as AMAT (44) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for QCOM (55) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that TSM's stock grew similarly to AMAT’s and somewhat faster than QCOM’s over the last 12 months.
QCOM's SMR Rating (22) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as AMAT (27) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry, and is in the same range as TSM (31) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that QCOM's stock grew similarly to AMAT’s and similarly to TSM’s over the last 12 months.
TSM's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as AMAT (55) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry, and is in the same range as QCOM (61) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that TSM's stock grew similarly to AMAT’s and similarly to QCOM’s over the last 12 months.
AMAT's P/E Growth Rating (52) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as TSM (61) in the Semiconductors industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for QCOM (85) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that AMAT's stock grew similarly to TSM’s and somewhat faster than QCOM’s over the last 12 months.
| AMAT | QCOM | TSM | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 51% | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 64% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 65% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 75% | 6 days ago 64% | 10 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 4 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 62% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 81% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BBJP | 61.20 | 0.41 | +0.67% |
| JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF | |||
| MARU | 26.28 | N/A | N/A |
| AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 UncMarETF | |||
| ENOR | 27.10 | -0.05 | -0.20% |
| iShares MSCI Norway ETF | |||
| TEAF | 12.06 | -0.09 | -0.74% |
| Ecofin Sustainable and Social Impact Term Fund | |||
| FFSM | 27.25 | -0.38 | -1.36% |
| Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF | |||
QCOM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QCOM has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QCOM jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QCOM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QCOM | 100% | +0.97% | ||
| LRCX - QCOM | 80% Closely correlated | +1.61% | ||
| ADI - QCOM | 79% Closely correlated | -1.30% | ||
| NXPI - QCOM | 78% Closely correlated | -1.80% | ||
| KLAC - QCOM | 78% Closely correlated | +0.87% | ||
| RMBS - QCOM | 76% Closely correlated | -2.06% | ||
More | ||||
TSM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TSM has been closely correlated with ASX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TSM jumps, then ASX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TSM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSM | 100% | -2.65% | ||
| ASX - TSM | 82% Closely correlated | +5.37% | ||
| NVDA - TSM | 78% Closely correlated | -2.33% | ||
| ASML - TSM | 74% Closely correlated | -0.70% | ||
| AVGO - TSM | 73% Closely correlated | -1.72% | ||
| MTSI - TSM | 73% Closely correlated | -0.61% | ||
More | ||||