Investors comparing APO, BLK, and BN are essentially weighing three distinct business models within the broader financial-services and alternative-investment landscape. This stock comparison is relevant for traders and long-term investors seeking exposure to asset gathering, credit origination, or real-asset ownership. Because each company generates earnings through different mechanisms and responds differently to interest rates, market volatility, and capital-markets activity, their market positioning offers useful contrasts rather than a simple like-for-like matchup. Understanding these differences helps clarify which profile may align with a given strategy or risk tolerance.
Apollo Global Management is a high-growth alternative asset manager best known for private credit, but it has built a diversified platform spanning credit, equity, and retirement services. In recent weeks, sentiment toward APO has been supported by strong operating results: total AUM reached roughly $938 billion, up about 25% year over year, driven by record origination activity and inflows. The firm has highlighted record fee-related earnings and spread-related earnings, reflecting both its asset-management and insurance (Athene) businesses.
Recent market activity has shown resilience in APO shares relative to some private-credit peers, which analysts have partly attributed to the perceived stability of its perpetual capital base. Analyst actions in recent weeks, including upgraded and newly initiated ratings, have reinforced the constructive tone. Key catalysts include continued retirement-services growth, the integration of acquired real-estate capabilities, and expanding global-wealth distribution.
BlackRock is the world's largest asset manager, operating across passive index funds, active management, private markets, and technology services through its Aladdin platform. In recent weeks, BLK has drawn attention for surpassing a record $14 trillion in AUM, with full-year net inflows of roughly $698 billion, led by its iShares ETF franchise and a growing private-markets business.
Recent performance has been shaped by accelerating organic base-fee growth and a strategic pivot into higher-fee alternatives, including private credit and infrastructure, following several acquisitions. BlackRock also raised its quarterly dividend and expanded its share-repurchase authorization, signaling confidence in cash-flow durability. Even so, BLK has historically lagged the broader market in strong equity rallies, reflecting its diversified, fee-driven profile and its sensitivity to overall market levels rather than any single catalyst.
Brookfield Corporation is a global alternative-asset manager and owner of real assets, operating through asset management, wealth solutions (insurance), and direct operating businesses across renewable power, infrastructure, real estate, and private equity. In recent weeks, BN reported record distributable earnings before realizations of about $5.4 billion, supported by fee-bearing capital of roughly $603 billion and strong fundraising across flagship strategies.
Momentum has been underpinned by a rising dividend, increased insurance assets, and a record pace of asset monetizations. Strategic partnerships tied to power, artificial-intelligence infrastructure, and nuclear energy have reinforced Brookfield's exposure to secular themes. Recent market activity reflects a diversified earnings mix, with performance influenced by real-asset valuations, transaction activity, and insurance spreads, making BN somewhat less correlated to daily equity-market moves than a pure asset gatherer.
For traders seeking a data-driven edge, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page curates the platform's most suitable automated strategies for current market conditions. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI Trading Bots that trade thousands of different tickers, each with distinct trading styles, strategies, timeframes, performance histories, and ticker sets. Rather than listing every available bot, the Trending AI Robots section highlights only those best aligned with prevailing market environments, helping users filter signal from noise. Traders can explore these curated strategies to monitor how AI-driven models approach tickers such as APO, BLK, and BN alongside the broader market. Explore the Trending AI Robots page to review available bots and their current performance statistics.
The three companies differ sharply in business model. BLK is fundamentally a scale-driven asset gatherer whose revenue tracks AUM and markets, increasingly augmented by higher-fee private markets and technology. APO is an origination-centric credit and insurance platform, where earnings are driven by fundraising, deployment, and spread-related income. BN blends asset management with direct real-asset ownership and insurance, giving it a more balance-sheet-driven profile.
Growth drivers also contrast: BLK leans on ETF flows and private-markets expansion; APO on credit origination and retirement services; and BN on fundraising, monetizations, and infrastructure-linked demand. Risk factors differ as well—BlackRock is sensitive to market beta and fee compression, Apollo to credit conditions and interest rates, and Brookfield to transaction markets and real-asset valuations. On sentiment, Apollo and Brookfield have benefited from strong operational momentum, while BlackRock's scale offers stability but comparatively lower growth torque in rising equity markets.
Based on observable trend consistency, stability, and catalyst momentum, Tickeron's AI would likely favor APO in the current environment. Its combination of record origination, strong inflows, and a stable perpetual-capital base presents a relatively consistent earnings trajectory, while ongoing retirement-services growth and analyst upgrades provide near-term catalysts. BLK offers defensive scale and durable cash flow, and BN offers diversified real-asset exposure, but Apollo's blend of momentum and structural growth appears most aligned with current market positioning. This assessment is probabilistic and reflects recent data rather than a definitive or guaranteed outcome.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
The RSI Indicator for APO moved out of oversold territory on October 21, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from a downward trend to an upward trend. Traders may want to buy the stock or call options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 29 similar instances when the indicator left oversold territory. In 26 of the 29 cases the stock moved higher. This puts the odds of a move higher at 90%.
The Stochastic Oscillator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 4 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an upward trend is expected.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for APO just turned positive on October 22, 2026. Looking at past instances where APO's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 37 of 47 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 79%.
Following a +3.25% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where APO advanced for three days, in 247 of 346 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 71%.
APO may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 13, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on APO as a result. In 49 of 86 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 57%.
The 10-day moving average for APO crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on September 21, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 7 of 13 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 54%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where APO declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 69%.
The Aroon Indicator for APO entered a downward trend on October 22, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 7 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 54 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating well-balanced risk and returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 82, placing this stock slightly better than average.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 71 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. APO’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 83 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (3.458) is normal, around the industry mean (2.404). P/E Ratio (40.433) is within average values for comparable stocks, (-3.413). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.446) is also within normal values, averaging (1.319). Dividend Yield (0.020) settles around the average of (0.272) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (2.062) is also within normal values, averaging (15.798).
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 85 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 88 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The 10-day moving average for BLK crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on October 22, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 10 of 15 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 67%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 14, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on BLK as a result. In 43 of 75 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 57%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for BLK just turned positive on September 25, 2026. Looking at past instances where BLK's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 24 of 46 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 52%.
BLK moved above its 50-day moving average on October 15, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
Following a +2.22% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where BLK advanced for three days, in 194 of 338 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 57%.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 143 of 293 cases where BLK Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 49%.
The 10-day RSI Indicator for BLK moved out of overbought territory on October 22, 2026. This could be a bearish sign for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 36 similar instances where the indicator moved out of overbought territory. In 19 of the 36 cases, the stock moved lower in the following days. This puts the odds of a move lower at 53%.
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 4 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where BLK declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 56%.
BLK broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 15, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 29 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating outstanding price growth. BLK’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 47 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating well-balanced risk and returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 82, placing this stock slightly better than average.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 49 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to consistent earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 63 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 85 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 90 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (3.057) is normal, around the industry mean (2.404). P/E Ratio (26.836) is within average values for comparable stocks, (-3.413). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.898) is also within normal values, averaging (1.319). Dividend Yield (0.020) settles around the average of (0.272) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (6.270) is also within normal values, averaging (15.798).
The RSI Oscillator for BN moved out of oversold territory on October 01, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from a downward trend to an upward trend. Traders may want to buy the stock or call options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 26 similar instances when the indicator left oversold territory. In 20 of the 26 cases the stock moved higher. This puts the odds of a move higher at 77%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 20, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on BN as a result. In 59 of 80 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 74%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for BN just turned positive on September 29, 2026. Looking at past instances where BN's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 27 of 46 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 59%.
Following a +2.57% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where BN advanced for three days, in 225 of 340 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 66%.
The Stochastic Oscillator has been in the overbought zone for 1 day. Expect a price pull-back in the near future.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where BN declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 67%.
BN broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 22, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for BN entered a downward trend on October 22, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 56 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating well-balanced risk and returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 82, placing this stock slightly better than average.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 70 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. BN’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 83 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (2.011) is normal, around the industry mean (2.404). P/E Ratio (68.357) is within average values for comparable stocks, (-3.413). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.110) is also within normal values, averaging (1.319). Dividend Yield (0.007) settles around the average of (0.272) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (1.135) is also within normal values, averaging (15.798).
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 85 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 87 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 92 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
APO | BLK | BN | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 70 | 36 | 12 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 83 Overvalued | 90 Overvalued | 83 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 54 | 47 | 56 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 88 | 63 | 87 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 71 | 29 | 70 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 7 | 49 | 92 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 85 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
APO's Valuation (83) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BN (83) and is in the same range as BLK (90). This means that APO's stock grew similarly to BN’s and similarly to BLK’s over the last 12 months.
BLK's Profit vs Risk Rating (47) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as APO (54) and is in the same range as BN (56). This means that BLK's stock grew similarly to APO’s and similarly to BN’s over the last 12 months.
BLK's SMR Rating (63) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BN (87) and is in the same range as APO (88). This means that BLK's stock grew similarly to BN’s and similarly to APO’s over the last 12 months.
BLK's Price Growth Rating (29) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BN (70) and is somewhat better than the same rating for APO (71). This means that BLK's stock grew somewhat faster than BN’s and somewhat faster than APO’s over the last 12 months.
APO's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BLK (49) and is significantly better than the same rating for BN (92). This means that APO's stock grew somewhat faster than BLK’s and significantly faster than BN’s over the last 12 months.
| APO | BLK | BN | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 53% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 60% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 52% | 1 day ago 59% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 67% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 61% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 3 days ago 57% | 1 day ago 66% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 69% | 16 days ago 56% | 5 days ago 67% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 50% | 1 day ago 57% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 49% | 1 day ago 55% |
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
APO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while BLK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and BN’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
APO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BLK’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s), and BN’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
APO (@Investment Managers) experienced а +2.65% price change this week, while BLK (@Investment Managers) price change was +1.47% , and BN (@Investment Managers) price fluctuated +3.99% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.84%.
APO is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2026.
BLK is expected to report earnings on Jan 21, 2027.
BN is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2026.
Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLK has been closely correlated with IVZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BLK jumps, then IVZ could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BN has been closely correlated with BAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BN jumps, then BAM could also see price increases.