Advertisement
ATR vs CL
Notable companies
Market Cap
High and low price notable news
Volume
Fundamental Analysis Ratings
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ATR is a StrongBuy and CL is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileATR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- ATR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ATR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ATR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- CL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
ATR (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а +2.01% price change this week, while CL (@Household/Personal Care) price change was -2.61% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was +3.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.92%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +2.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.02%.
Reported Earning Dates
ATR is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.
CL is expected to report earnings on Oct 31, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Pharmaceuticals: Other (+3.56% weekly)Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.
@Household/Personal Care (+2.83% weekly)Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.
| ATR | CL | ATR / CL | |
| Capitalization | 8.84B | 63.9B | 14% |
| EBITDA | 809M | 4.81B | 17% |
| Gain YTD | -13.873 | -11.581 | 120% |
| P/E Ratio | 23.17 | 22.19 | 104% |
| Revenue | 3.61B | 20B | 18% |
| Total Cash | 170M | 1.22B | 14% |
| Total Debt | 1.14B | 8.76B | 13% |
CL | ATR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 55 | 56 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 51 Fair valued | 58 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 73 | 72 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 6 | 54 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | 80 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 74 | 86 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CL's Valuation (51) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as ATR (58) in the Containers Or Packaging industry. This means that CL’s stock grew similarly to ATR’s over the last 12 months.
ATR's Profit vs Risk Rating (72) in the Containers Or Packaging industry is in the same range as CL (73) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that ATR’s stock grew similarly to CL’s over the last 12 months.
CL's SMR Rating (6) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ATR (54) in the Containers Or Packaging industry. This means that CL’s stock grew somewhat faster than ATR’s over the last 12 months.
CL's Price Growth Rating (64) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as ATR (80) in the Containers Or Packaging industry. This means that CL’s stock grew similarly to ATR’s over the last 12 months.
CL's P/E Growth Rating (74) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as ATR (86) in the Containers Or Packaging industry. This means that CL’s stock grew similarly to ATR’s over the last 12 months.
| ATR | CL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 37% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 45% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 38% | 2 days ago 42% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 34% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 45% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 45% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 9 days ago 42% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 42% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 46% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| USSG | 61.69 | 0.35 | +0.57% |
| Xtrackers MSCI USA Selection Eq ETF | |||
| FDVV | 56.02 | 0.31 | +0.56% |
| Fidelity High Dividend ETF | |||
| GPRF | 51.45 | 0.27 | +0.54% |
| Goldman Sachs Acs US Pref Stk &HySecETF | |||
| DEEP | 36.33 | 0.15 | +0.40% |
| Acquirers Small and Micro Deep Value ETF | |||
| LSAF | 44.36 | -0.37 | -0.83% |
| LeaderSharesTM AlphaFactor® US Cr Eq ETF | |||
ATR and Stocks
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ATR has been loosely correlated with AVTR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ATR jumps, then AVTR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ATR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATR | 100% | +0.36% | ||
| AVTR - ATR | 58% Loosely correlated | +9.54% | ||
| SYK - ATR | 52% Loosely correlated | -1.49% | ||
| A - ATR | 51% Loosely correlated | +7.97% | ||
| IQV - ATR | 50% Loosely correlated | +7.29% | ||
| RVTY - ATR | 49% Loosely correlated | +4.69% | ||
More | ||||
CL and Stocks
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CL has been closely correlated with PG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CL jumps, then PG could also see price increases.