BAC
Price
$62.05
Change
+$0.77 (+1.26%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
435.46B
80 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
EWBC
Price
$131.00
Change
+$0.37 (+0.28%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
17.95B
86 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
JPM
Price
$353.21
Change
+$3.31 (+0.95%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
938.9B
79 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BAC or EWBC or JPM

BAC vs EWBC vs JPM Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 26, 2026
Stock price -- (BAC: $62.05EWBC: $131.00JPM: $353.21)
Brand notoriety: BAC and JPM are notable and EWBC is not notable
BAC and JPM are part of the Major Banks industry, and EWBC is in the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAC: 79%, EWBC: 36%, JPM: 77%
Market capitalization -- BAC: $435.46B, EWBC: $17.95B, JPM: $938.9B
$BAC [@Major Banks] is valued at $435.46B. $JPM’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $ $938.9B. $EWBC [@Regional Banks] has a market capitalization of $ $17.95B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $ $938.9B to $ $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $ $142.82B to $ $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $ $213.63B. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $ $6.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileEWBC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and JPM’s FA Score reflects 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BAC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • EWBC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • JPM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, BAC and EWBC are a better buy in the long-term than JPM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAC’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EWBC’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s), and JPM’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • EWBC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • JPM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, JPM is a better buy in the short-term than BAC, which in turn is a better option than EWBC.

Price Growth

BAC (@Major Banks) experienced а +1.27% price change this week, while EWBC (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.62% , and JPM (@Major Banks) price fluctuated +3.55% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +0.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.75%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.08%.

Reported Earning Dates

BAC is expected to report earnings on Oct 14, 2026.

EWBC is expected to report earnings on Oct 20, 2026.

JPM is expected to report earnings on Oct 13, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+0.66% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

@Regional Banks (-0.57% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JPM($939B) has a higher market cap than BAC($435B) and EWBC($17.9B). JPM has higher P/E ratio than BAC and EWBC: JPM (15.13) vs BAC (14.33) and EWBC (12.58). EWBC YTD gains are higher at: 18.130 vs. BAC (14.045) and JPM (11.174). BAC has more cash in the bank: 27.1B vs. JPM (22B) and EWBC (656M). EWBC has less debt than BAC and JPM: EWBC (3.18B) vs BAC (384B) and JPM (517B). JPM has higher revenues than BAC and EWBC: JPM (186B) vs BAC (115B) and EWBC (2.98B).
BACEWBCJPM
Capitalization435B17.9B939B
EBITDAN/AN/AN/A
Gain YTD14.04518.13011.174
P/E Ratio14.3312.5815.13
Revenue115B2.98B186B
Total Cash27.1B656M22B
Total Debt384B3.18B517B
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAC vs EWBC vs JPM: Fundamental Ratings
BAC
EWBC
JPM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
875033
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
68
Overvalued
88
Overvalued
85
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
41358
SMR RATING
1..100
3132
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
134517
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
494351
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
505050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BAC's Valuation (68) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as JPM (85) in the Major Banks industry, and is in the same range as EWBC (88) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that BAC's stock grew similarly to JPM’s and similarly to EWBC’s over the last 12 months.

JPM's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as EWBC (35) in the Regional Banks industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for BAC (41) in the Major Banks industry. This means that JPM's stock grew similarly to EWBC’s and somewhat faster than BAC’s over the last 12 months.

JPM's SMR Rating (2) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BAC (3) in the Major Banks industry, and is in the same range as EWBC (13) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that JPM's stock grew similarly to BAC’s and similarly to EWBC’s over the last 12 months.

BAC's Price Growth Rating (13) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as JPM (17) in the Major Banks industry, and is in the same range as EWBC (45) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that BAC's stock grew similarly to JPM’s and similarly to EWBC’s over the last 12 months.

EWBC's P/E Growth Rating (43) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BAC (49) in the Major Banks industry, and is in the same range as JPM (51) in the Major Banks industry. This means that EWBC's stock grew similarly to BAC’s and similarly to JPM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BACEWBCJPM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BAC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
EWBC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
JPM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BHB39.020.80
+2.09%
Bar Harbor Bankshares
BANC21.28-0.10
-0.47%
Banc of California
CCHH1.37-0.01
-0.72%
CCH Holdings Ltd
SCOR7.23-0.07
-0.89%
comScore
FSLR202.82-3.10
-1.51%
First Solar

BAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAC has been closely correlated with WFC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BAC jumps, then WFC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BAC
1D Price
Change %
BAC100%
+1.26%
WFC - BAC
80%
Closely correlated
+0.14%
JPM - BAC
75%
Closely correlated
+0.95%
C - BAC
74%
Closely correlated
+0.24%
EWBC - BAC
68%
Closely correlated
+0.28%
BCS - BAC
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.90%
More

EWBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWBC has been closely correlated with ZION. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWBC jumps, then ZION could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EWBC
1D Price
Change %
EWBC100%
+0.28%
ZION - EWBC
83%
Closely correlated
+0.19%
FNB - EWBC
83%
Closely correlated
+0.95%
ASB - EWBC
83%
Closely correlated
+1.82%
ONB - EWBC
82%
Closely correlated
+1.46%
FULT - EWBC
82%
Closely correlated
+1.28%
More

JPM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JPM has been closely correlated with BAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if JPM jumps, then BAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JPM
1D Price
Change %
JPM100%
+0.95%
BAC - JPM
74%
Closely correlated
+1.26%
C - JPM
69%
Closely correlated
+0.24%
WFC - JPM
66%
Closely correlated
+0.14%
BCS - JPM
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.90%
RY - JPM
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.30%
More