This stock comparison examines three prominent South American banks: Credicorp Ltd. (BAP), Banco de Chile (BCH), and Banco Santander (Brasil) S.A. (BSBR). Operating in Peru, Chile, and Brazil respectively, these institutions offer exposure to emerging market banking dynamics, including loan growth, net interest margins, and regional economic trends. Investors and traders interested in dividend yields, value plays, or Latin American recovery themes will find this analysis relevant for assessing relative performance and market positioning in the current environment.
Credicorp Ltd. (BAP) is a financial services holding company primarily operating through Banco de Crédito del Perú, providing retail banking, commercial lending, and insurance across Peru and select Latin American markets. In recent market activity, BAP shares have pulled back around 7% over the past month amid broader sector volatility, trading near $322 with a market cap of approximately $25.5 billion. This follows strong 2025 full-year results, including record net income and 19% ROE, driven by Peru's GDP growth and improved NII (net interest income). Sentiment has been influenced by solid asset quality, with lower NCO ratios (net charge-offs, the net value of loans written off), though currency fluctuations and rate sensitivities weigh on near-term momentum.
Banco de Chile (BCH), one of Chile's largest banks, offers a wide range of services including mortgages, consumer loans, and corporate banking, generating over 60% of revenue from NII. Shares have faced downward pressure in recent weeks, declining about 3% to around $36.60, with a market cap near $18.5 billion. Full-year 2025 net income reached CLP 1.2 trillion, supported by stable revenues and a robust CET1 ratio of 14.5%, alongside ROAA (return on average assets) of 2.2%. Performance reflects resilient provisions coverage at 223%, but has been tempered by economic slowdown concerns and competitive pressures in Chile's banking sector.
Banco Santander (Brasil) S.A. (BSBR) provides comprehensive banking products to individuals and SMEs in Brazil, with a focus on retail and wholesale operations. In recent trading, BSBR has softened roughly 4% over the past month to about $5.80, maintaining a market cap around $22 billion and P/E near 18. Q1 2026 results showed net profit of R$3.8 billion and 16% ROE, fueled by loan portfolio expansion and favorable funding costs, though below some expectations. Sentiment is shaped by Brazil's interest rate environment and sustainable finance initiatives, offset by NCO pressures in a high-inflation context.
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases the top 25 performers selected from over 350 AI trading bots that analyze and trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and market conditions. These curated bots excel in current volatility, boasting impressive stats such as annualized returns up to +127%, win rates ranging from 50% to 70%, profit factors of 1.7 to 3.3, and profit-to-drawdown ratios often exceeding 5. Examples include semiconductor-focused agents with +97% returns on tickers like LRCX and NVDA, and space sector bots hitting +127% on ASTS and GSAT. Each bot employs unique styles—from short-term scalping (5min charts) to swing trades (days-long holds)—with low drawdowns under $13,000 in simulations. Traders can explore these high-potential tools to complement manual analysis and adapt to shifting markets.
These banks share universal models emphasizing retail lending and NII, but differ in growth drivers: BAP benefits from Peru's demand rebound, BCH from Chile's stability, and BSBR from Brazil's scale. Recent momentum favors BAP's 60% yearly rise versus peers' flatter or negative YTD shifts. Risk factors include currency volatility and rate hikes, with BCH showing lowest beta exposure. Valuation sensitivity highlights BAP's cheaper P/E amid higher ROE, while BSBR trades at a premium for yield. Market sentiment tilts toward Peruvian resilience over Brazilian inflation risks and Chilean moderation.
Tickeron's AI models currently lean toward BAP based on consistent trend strength, superior ROE at 19%, lower relative valuation, and positive catalysts like asset quality gains. While BCH offers stability and BSBR yield appeal, BAP's positioning suggests higher probability of outperformance in the near term amid regional recovery.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BAP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileBCH’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s), and BSBR’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BAP’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BCH’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s), and BSBR’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
BAP (@Regional Banks) experienced а -5.88% price change this week, while BCH (@Regional Banks) price change was -4.18% , and BSBR (@Regional Banks) price fluctuated -3.68% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.20%.
BAP is expected to report earnings on Aug 13, 2026.
BCH is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
BSBR is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2026.
Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| BAP | BCH | BSBR | |
| Capitalization | 25.9B | 18.7B | 19.8B |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Gain YTD | 12.369 | 8.460 | -7.863 |
| P/E Ratio | 12.35 | 14.63 | 16.20 |
| Revenue | 23.3B | 2.96T | 46.7B |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Total Debt | 23.5B | 13.41T | N/A |
BAP | BCH | BSBR | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 67 | 64 | 68 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 37 Fair valued | 52 Fair valued | 17 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 9 | 1 | 85 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 6 | 1 | 3 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 46 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | 29 | 56 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 8 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BSBR's Valuation (17) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BAP (37) and is somewhat better than the same rating for BCH (52). This means that BSBR's stock grew similarly to BAP’s and somewhat faster than BCH’s over the last 12 months.
BCH's Profit vs Risk Rating (1) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BAP (9) and is significantly better than the same rating for BSBR (85). This means that BCH's stock grew similarly to BAP’s and significantly faster than BSBR’s over the last 12 months.
BCH's SMR Rating (1) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BSBR (3) and is in the same range as BAP (6). This means that BCH's stock grew similarly to BSBR’s and similarly to BAP’s over the last 12 months.
BAP's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BCH (46) and is in the same range as BSBR (60). This means that BAP's stock grew similarly to BCH’s and similarly to BSBR’s over the last 12 months.
BCH's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BAP (39) and is in the same range as BSBR (56). This means that BCH's stock grew similarly to BAP’s and similarly to BSBR’s over the last 12 months.
| BAP | BCH | BSBR | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A | 2 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 45% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 69% | 11 days ago 72% | 11 days ago 66% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 6 days ago 54% | 6 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 40% | 2 days ago 59% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCH has been closely correlated with BSAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BCH jumps, then BSAC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BCH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BCH | 100% | -1.64% | ||
| BSAC - BCH | 85% Closely correlated | -1.96% | ||
| BBD - BCH | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.88% | ||
| BSBR - BCH | 62% Loosely correlated | -2.06% | ||
| ITUB - BCH | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.31% | ||
| INTR - BCH | 53% Loosely correlated | -1.74% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BSBR has been closely correlated with BBD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BSBR jumps, then BBD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BSBR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSBR | 100% | -2.06% | ||
| BBD - BSBR | 82% Closely correlated | -0.88% | ||
| ITUB - BSBR | 81% Closely correlated | -1.31% | ||
| INTR - BSBR | 69% Closely correlated | -1.74% | ||
| BCH - BSBR | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.64% | ||
| BSAC - BSBR | 61% Loosely correlated | -1.96% | ||
More | ||||