BHE
Price
$78.45
Change
+$1.05 (+1.36%)
Updated
Jul 17 closing price
Capitalization
2.81B
17 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FN
Price
$478.39
Change
+$18.20 (+3.95%)
Updated
Jul 17 closing price
Capitalization
17.14B
36 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
GLW
Price
$154.61
Change
-$3.78 (-2.39%)
Updated
Jul 17 closing price
Capitalization
133.06B
9 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BHE or FN or GLW

BHE vs FN vs GLW Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 19, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Benchmark Electronics (BHE) vs. Fabrinet (FN) vs. Corning (GLW) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Corning (GLW) has delivered the most consistent large-scale growth trajectory, powered by its upgraded Springboard plan and surging demand for Gen AI optical products.
  • Fabrinet (FN) posted exceptional fiscal-year revenue growth of 19%, driven by telecom and datacenter interconnect demand, though recent months have seen notable price volatility.
  • Benchmark Electronics (BHE) demonstrated a meaningful turnaround in 2026, supported by multi-year record bookings and accelerating enterprise AI opportunities, but operates with thinner profit margins.
  • All three companies benefit from secular tailwinds tied to AI infrastructure, optical networking, and advanced manufacturing — yet each occupies a distinct position in the value chain.
  • Valuation profiles diverge sharply: GLW and FN command premium multiples reflecting their growth narratives, while BHE trades at a more modest valuation relative to earnings.
  • Risk factors differ by company — GLW faces exposure to consumer electronics cycles, FN contends with customer concentration, and BHE navigates restructuring costs and sector-specific demand swings.

Introduction

Investors seeking exposure to the technology hardware and advanced manufacturing ecosystem face a diverse set of choices, each offering a different balance of growth potential, valuation, and risk. This stock comparison examines three publicly traded companies — BHE (Benchmark Electronics), FN (Fabrinet), and GLW (Corning Incorporated) — that collectively span electronic manufacturing services (EMS), precision optical packaging, and advanced materials science. While all three are linked to the broader artificial intelligence and communications infrastructure buildout, their business models, scale, and market positioning differ considerably. This comparison is designed for traders and long-term investors who want to understand relative performance, structural advantages, and how each stock may fit into a diversified portfolio under current market conditions.

BHE Overview and Recent Performance

BHE, or Benchmark Electronics, Inc., is a Tempe, Arizona-based EMS provider that specializes in high-complexity manufacturing for regulated industries including aerospace and defense (A&D), medical devices, semiconductor capital equipment (semi-cap), and advanced computing. Unlike commodity-focused contract manufacturers, Benchmark differentiates itself through engineering and design services that span the full product lifecycle — from concept to global delivery. In recent quarters, the company has posted encouraging sequential revenue growth, with full-year 2025 revenue reaching $2.66 billion, essentially flat compared to 2024. More notably, management reported a multi-year record in new bookings during mid-2025, signaling recovering demand across most market sectors. The A&D and semi-cap segments have been particular bright spots, delivering double-digit year-over-year growth, while the Advanced Computing & Communications segment experienced meaningful contraction. In recent weeks, shares of BHE have pulled back from elevated levels reached earlier in 2026, though the stock remains substantially higher on a year-to-date basis. The company's non-GAAP (a term referring to adjusted financial measures that exclude certain one-time or non-cash items) operating margins have hovered around the 5% range, and management has guided for continued margin expansion as enterprise AI opportunities begin ramping.

FN Overview and Recent Performance

FN, or Fabrinet, is a Thailand-based provider of advanced optical packaging and precision optical, electro-mechanical, and electronic manufacturing services to original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) of complex products. The company's core expertise lies in optical communication components, modules, and subsystems — areas that have experienced explosive demand growth tied to datacenter interconnect requirements and next-generation networking infrastructure. Fabrinet closed its fiscal year 2025 with record revenue of $3.42 billion, representing a 19% year-over-year increase, while non-GAAP earnings per diluted share reached an all-time high of $10.17. The company's telecom segment has been particularly robust, benefiting from both increasing demand for datacenter interconnect products and early traction from new systems wins. In recent market activity, however, FN shares have experienced notable volatility and have declined from their late-2025 peak, reflecting broader repositioning in the optical and networking space. Despite the pullback, Fabrinet's revenue growth trajectory remains among the strongest in its peer group, and the company continues to invest in capacity expansion to meet growing customer demand. The company also maintains a share repurchase program, which was expanded during the recent period.

GLW Overview and Recent Performance

GLW, or Corning Incorporated, is a global materials science and advanced manufacturing giant with a market capitalization well above $130 billion. Corning's products span optical communications, mobile consumer electronics, display technologies, automotive glass, and life sciences. The company has been executing on its ambitious "Springboard" growth plan, which aims to add billions in incremental annualized sales by deepening Corning's content across existing platforms and capitalizing on powerful secular trends. Full-year 2025 results were outstanding: core sales grew 13% to $16.41 billion, core EPS (earnings per share, a key profitability metric) rose 29% to $2.52, and core operating margin expanded significantly to 20.2% by the fourth quarter — reaching a key profitability target a full year ahead of schedule. The Optical Communications segment's enterprise business surged, growing 58% year-over-year in one recent quarter alone, driven by robust adoption of Corning's new generative AI (Gen AI) products. In addition, Apple's $2.5 billion commitment to produce iPhone and Apple Watch cover glass at Corning's Kentucky facility has added a durable, multi-year growth driver. In recent weeks, GLW shares have experienced a pullback alongside broader technology-sector rotation, yet the stock remains up substantially on a one-year basis. Management has continued upgrading its Springboard targets, now projecting $11 billion in incremental annualized sales by the end of 2028.

Trending AI Robots

In an environment where market conditions shift rapidly, traders increasingly turn to data-driven tools to help identify opportunities and manage risk. Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots — drawn from a marketplace of hundreds of available bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers. Only those bots demonstrating the strongest alignment with current market dynamics earn a place in this featured section. These bots employ diverse trading styles, strategies, and timeframes — ranging from short-term momentum plays to longer-duration trend-following approaches — and each maintains its own track record of performance statistics, win rates, and trade volume. Some bots in the ecosystem have generated annualized returns well into the double digits, though individual results vary based on strategy and market regime. By visiting the Trending AI Robots page, traders can explore which automated strategies are currently resonating with real-time market conditions and evaluate whether AI-assisted trading aligns with their own approach to the market.

Head-to-Head Comparison

When evaluating BHE, FN, and GLW side by side, several contrasts emerge. In terms of scale, Corning operates at an entirely different level — its $15.6 billion in annual revenue dwarfs Fabrinet's $3.4 billion and Benchmark's $2.7 billion. This gives GLW advantages in pricing power, R&D (research and development) investment capacity, and diversification across end markets, but it also means growth rates are inherently more moderate than those of smaller, more focused competitors.

Fabrinet's business model is more concentrated, with heavy exposure to optical communications — a high-growth but cyclically sensitive sector. Its revenue growth of 19% in fiscal 2025 outpaced both Benchmark (flat) and Corning's core sales growth (13%), making it the fastest-expanding name in this trio. However, that growth concentration also amplifies risk: a slowdown in telecom or datacom spending could disproportionately affect FN.

Benchmark Electronics occupies a different niche. Its gross margins in the 10% range are structurally lower than Fabrinet's and Corning's, reflecting the competitive dynamics of the EMS industry. Yet BHE offers a potential turnaround narrative: multi-year record bookings, ramping AI-related opportunities, and an expanding North American manufacturing footprint all point to improving fundamentals — if execution follows through.

On valuation, GLW and FN both trade at elevated multiples relative to historical norms, reflecting market enthusiasm for their AI-linked growth stories. BHE trades at a more modest valuation, potentially offering a different risk-reward calculus for value-oriented investors. From a sentiment perspective, all three stocks have experienced recent pullbacks, though Corning's diversified revenue base and upgraded growth plan provide arguably the most sturdy foundation amid sector rotation.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable trend consistency, financial momentum, and relative market positioning, Tickeron's AI-driven analysis would likely favor GLW among the three for its combination of scale, earnings growth trajectory, margin expansion, and multi-catalyst profile. Corning's Springboard plan has transitioned from a forward-looking framework into a quantifiable driver of results, with core operating margins now exceeding 20% and free cash flow nearly doubling over a two-year period. The company's exposure to Gen AI optical products, U.S.-based solar manufacturing, and a committed multi-year agreement with Apple provides a diversified set of growth catalysts that are less dependent on any single end market. FN would rank as a close second, given its superior revenue growth rate and direct exposure to the optical networking buildout, though higher volatility and a narrower business focus introduce additional uncertainty. BHE presents the most asymmetric opportunity — with significant upside potential if its bookings momentum translates into sustained revenue and margin expansion, but also the greatest execution risk. As always, these assessments represent probabilistic evaluations based on available data and should be weighed alongside individual investment objectives.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 19, 2026
Stock price -- (BHE: $78.45FN: $478.39GLW: $154.61)
Brand notoriety: BHE and FN are not notable and GLW is notable
The three companies represent the Electronic Components industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BHE: 83%, FN: 104%, GLW: 97%
Market capitalization -- BHE: $2.81B, FN: $17.14B, GLW: $133.06B
$BHE is valued at $2.81B, while FN has a market capitalization of $17.14B, and GLW's market capitalization is $133.06B. The market cap for tickers in this @Electronic Components ranges from $186.01B to $0. The average market capitalization across the @Electronic Components industry is $12.74B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BHE’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and GLW’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BHE’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GLW’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FN is a better buy in the long-term than BHE, which in turn is a better option than GLW.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BHE’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FN’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and GLW’s TA Score reflects 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BHE’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GLW’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FN is a better buy in the short-term than BHE, which in turn is a better option than GLW.

Price Growth

BHE (@Electronic Components) experienced а -7.77% price change this week, while FN (@Electronic Components) price change was +1.54% , and GLW (@Electronic Components) price fluctuated -19.01% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was -5.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -11.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.49%.

Reported Earning Dates

BHE is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

FN is expected to report earnings on Aug 24, 2026.

GLW is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Components (-5.29% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLW($133B) has a higher market cap than FN($17.1B) and BHE($2.82B). BHE has higher P/E ratio than GLW and FN: BHE (83.46) vs GLW (74.33) and FN (41.10). BHE YTD gains are higher at: 84.380 vs. GLW (77.177) and FN (5.076). GLW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.07B vs. FN (510M) and BHE (138M). FN has less debt than BHE and GLW: FN (4.43M) vs BHE (304M) and GLW (9.92B). GLW has higher revenues than FN and BHE: GLW (16.3B) vs FN (4.24B) and BHE (2.71B).
BHEFNGLW
Capitalization2.82B17.1B133B
EBITDA138M510M4.07B
Gain YTD84.3805.07677.177
P/E Ratio83.4641.1074.33
Revenue2.71B4.24B16.3B
Total CashN/A945M1.76B
Total Debt304M4.43M9.92B
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BHE vs FN vs GLW: Fundamental Ratings
BHE
FN
GLW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
81579
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
55
Fair valued
57
Fair valued
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
163742
SMR RATING
1..100
894554
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
396237
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
53180
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BHE's Valuation (55) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as FN (57) and is in the same range as GLW (73). This means that BHE's stock grew similarly to FN’s and similarly to GLW’s over the last 12 months.

BHE's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as FN (37) and is in the same range as GLW (42). This means that BHE's stock grew similarly to FN’s and similarly to GLW’s over the last 12 months.

FN's SMR Rating (45) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as GLW (54) and is somewhat better than the same rating for BHE (89). This means that FN's stock grew similarly to GLW’s and somewhat faster than BHE’s over the last 12 months.

GLW's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as BHE (39) and is in the same range as FN (62). This means that GLW's stock grew similarly to BHE’s and similarly to FN’s over the last 12 months.

BHE's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as FN (31) and is significantly better than the same rating for GLW (80). This means that BHE's stock grew similarly to FN’s and significantly faster than GLW’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BHEFNGLW
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BHE
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GLW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BJRI67.495.02
+8.04%
BJ's Restaurants
MOBX1.970.05
+2.60%
Mobix Labs Inc.
ERAS19.170.15
+0.79%
Erasca
SAN13.55-0.07
-0.51%
Banco Santander SA
FRAF62.58-0.91
-1.43%
Franklin Financial Services Corp

BHE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BHE has been closely correlated with PLXS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BHE jumps, then PLXS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BHE
1D Price
Change %
BHE100%
+1.36%
PLXS - BHE
75%
Closely correlated
+0.74%
CTS - BHE
71%
Closely correlated
-0.13%
KN - BHE
69%
Closely correlated
-0.73%
TTMI - BHE
68%
Closely correlated
+1.43%
LFUS - BHE
67%
Closely correlated
-1.06%
More

FN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FN has been closely correlated with CLS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FN jumps, then CLS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FN
1D Price
Change %
FN100%
+3.95%
CLS - FN
67%
Closely correlated
-0.83%
JBL - FN
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.97%
GLW - FN
64%
Loosely correlated
-2.39%
BHE - FN
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.36%
LFUS - FN
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.06%
More