Advertisement
C or JPM or WFC
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Citigroup (C) vs. JPMorgan Chase (JPM) vs. Wells Fargo (WFC) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- C posted its strongest third quarter in a decade, with net income up roughly 40% year over year, yet shares still sold off amid the broader bank-stock correction.
- JPM remains the sector's profitability leader, but it delivered a rare earnings and revenue miss, its first in roughly three years.
- WFC reported mixed results, narrowly beating earnings per share (EPS) while missing on revenue and net interest income (NII, the income a bank earns from lending and investing).
- All three trade below their recent highs as the KBW Bank Index logged its longest weekly losing streak since 2008.
- Valuation diverges sharply: JPM carries a premium price-to-book ratio, while C and WFC trade at lower multiples with different growth profiles.
Introduction
Citigroup, JPMorgan Chase, and Wells Fargo are three of the largest U.S. financial institutions, yet they occupy distinct positions in the market. JPMorgan Chase is the industry's scale and profitability benchmark; Citigroup is mid-turnaround under a simplification strategy; and Wells Fargo is still operating within a regulatory framework shaped by its past. For traders and investors weighing relative performance, market positioning, and risk, this stock comparison examines how each name has behaved in recent weeks and what has driven sentiment. The analysis below focuses on observable fundamentals, recent momentum, and valuation rather than short-term price forecasts.
C Overview and Recent Performance
Citigroup Inc. (C) is a diversified global bank organized around five core businesses: Services, Markets, Banking, Wealth, and U.S. Personal Banking. Under CEO Jane Fraser, the company has spent recent years exiting international consumer franchises and simplifying its structure. In its latest quarter, Citigroup reported net income of about $5.25 billion, up roughly 40% year over year, with revenue of roughly $23.85 billion marking its best third quarter in a decade. NII rose about 14%, supported by lending and deposit growth.
Despite the earnings beat, the stock has been under pressure in recent weeks, reflecting the sector-wide selloff and investor caution about the bank's remaining regulatory and restructuring work, including the ongoing Banamex separation. Efficiency has improved, with the efficiency ratio falling to 58.5% from 64.7% a year earlier, and return on tangible common equity (ROTCE, a measure of profitability relative to shareholder capital) reached about 11.5%. The stock trades at a lower price-to-book multiple than its peers, a key part of the bull case, while legacy complexity remains the primary counterpoint.
JPM Overview and Recent Performance
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the largest U.S. bank by assets, spanning consumer and community banking, a commercial and investment bank, and asset and wealth management. In the most recent quarter, revenue rose about 8% to roughly $50.2 billion and diluted EPS increased to about $5.57, but both figures came in below consensus expectations — a rare miss for a company that had not fallen short on the bottom line in about three years. Softer fixed-income trading and higher costs weighed on results.
Still, JPMorgan raised its full-year NII outlook, and its ROTCE of roughly 20–21% remains well above peers. The firm commands a premium valuation, reflecting its scale, diversified earnings, and what management calls a "fortress balance sheet." Recent share-price behavior has been steadier than some rivals, though the stock also sits below its August record. For investors, JPMorgan represents quality and consistency, but that quality is already reflected in a richer multiple and a lower dividend yield than its large-bank peers.
WFC Overview and Recent Performance
Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) is a diversified financial services firm with a strong U.S. retail and commercial banking franchise, alongside a growing capital-markets and investment-banking business. It continues to operate under an asset cap imposed by regulators, which constrains balance-sheet growth relative to peers. In its latest quarter, Wells Fargo reported EPS of about $1.87, narrowly above estimates, while revenue of roughly $21.87 billion and NII came in below expectations.
Average loans and deposits each grew, and management pointed to healthy credit quality, but higher provisions for credit losses and softer revenue weighed on results. The stock has been among the weaker performers of the three in recent weeks, though it still carries a modestly higher price-to-book ratio than Citigroup. Wells Fargo's investment narrative centers on continued expense discipline, capital-markets expansion, and the eventual removal of the asset cap, balanced against a still-narrower growth runway in the near term.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page highlights a curated selection of the platform's AI trading bots, chosen from hundreds of available bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers. Because each bot operates with its own trading style, strategy, timeframe, and performance statistics, only those best suited to current market conditions earn a place in this section. This focus on relevance and adaptability gives traders a way to compare quantitative approaches rather than relying on a single signal. To explore which strategies are currently leading, visit the Trending AI Robots page.
Head-to-Head Comparison
The clearest contrast among the three names is profitability versus valuation. JPMorgan generates a ROTCE roughly double that of Citigroup and comfortably ahead of Wells Fargo, and it commands a premium price-to-book multiple as a result. Citigroup offers the lowest multiple and an improving efficiency trajectory, but its turnaround remains incomplete and its return metrics trail the group. Wells Fargo sits between the two on valuation while its growth is constrained by the asset cap.
On recent momentum, all three have been caught in the broad bank-stock correction driven by higher-for-longer rate expectations and credit concerns, but the reaction to earnings differed. Citigroup beat estimates yet sold off, a sign of elevated positioning risk; JPMorgan missed yet held up relatively well, reflecting investor confidence in its franchise; Wells Fargo fell on its revenue and NII shortfall. Sector exposure also differs: JPMorgan and Citigroup carry larger capital-markets and trading businesses, which add cyclicality, while Wells Fargo is more weighted to U.S. consumer and commercial lending.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, earnings quality, and relative positioning, Tickeron's AI would likely lean toward JPM as the more stable candidate in the current environment. Its superior and comparatively durable profitability, diversified revenue base, and stronger relative share-price resilience suggest more consistent trend characteristics, even after a rare earnings miss. Citigroup presents a higher-uncertainty, potentially higher-reward profile given its lower valuation and improving efficiency, while Wells Fargo faces a more constrained near-term growth path. As with any probabilistic assessment, these signals reflect current data rather than a guaranteed outcome.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
C in upward trend: price expected to rise as it breaks its lower Bollinger Band on October 13, 2026
C may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options. In 31 of 33 cases where C's price broke its lower Bollinger Band, its price rose further in the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 5 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an upward trend is expected.
Following a +1.77% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where C advanced for three days, in 229 of 342 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 67%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 13, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on C as a result. In 49 of 81 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 60%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for C turned negative on October 13, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 44 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 24 of the 44 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 55%.
C moved below its 50-day moving average on September 28, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
The 10-day moving average for C crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on September 25, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 13 of 17 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 76%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where C declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 64%.
The Aroon Indicator for C entered a downward trend on October 22, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 1 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 15 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating low risk on high returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 20, placing this stock better than average.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 31 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.068) is normal, around the industry mean (1.531). P/E Ratio (12.964) is within average values for comparable stocks, (11.865). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.612) is also within normal values, averaging (2.139). Dividend Yield (0.022) settles around the average of (0.034) among similar stocks. C's P/S Ratio (2.616) is slightly lower than the industry average of (3.867).
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 47 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 56 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. C’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
JPM sees its Stochastic Oscillator recovers from oversold territory
On October 07, 2026, the Stochastic Oscillator for JPM moved out of oversold territory and this could be a bullish sign for the stock. Traders may want to buy the stock or buy call options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 54 instances where the indicator left the oversold zone. In 38 of the 54 cases the stock moved higher in the following days. This puts the odds of a move higher at over 70%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where JPM's RSI Oscillator exited the oversold zone, 17 of 28 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 61%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 14, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on JPM as a result. In 50 of 82 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 61%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for JPM just turned positive on October 12, 2026. Looking at past instances where JPM's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 28 of 48 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 58%.
Following a +1.32% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where JPM advanced for three days, in 217 of 362 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 60%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The 10-day moving average for JPM crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on September 18, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 5 of 14 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 36%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where JPM declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 59%.
JPM broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 16, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for JPM entered a downward trend on October 12, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 1 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 9 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating low risk on high returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 20, placing this stock better than average.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 44 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to consistent earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 51 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. JPM’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 90 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: JPM's P/B Ratio (2.530) is slightly higher than the industry average of (1.531). P/E Ratio (14.394) is within average values for comparable stocks, (11.865). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.562) is also within normal values, averaging (2.139). Dividend Yield (0.020) settles around the average of (0.034) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (4.888) is also within normal values, averaging (3.867).
WFC in upward trend: price may jump up because it broke its lower Bollinger Band on September 22, 2026
WFC may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options. In 27 of 39 cases where WFC's price broke its lower Bollinger Band, its price rose further in the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 69%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where WFC's RSI Oscillator exited the oversold zone, 15 of 26 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 58%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 09, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on WFC as a result. In 50 of 75 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 67%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for WFC just turned positive on October 09, 2026. Looking at past instances where WFC's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 32 of 47 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 68%.
Following a +0.98% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where WFC advanced for three days, in 202 of 330 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 61%.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 164 of 268 cases where WFC Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 61%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 43 of 70 cases where WFC's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 61%.
WFC moved below its 50-day moving average on September 17, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
The 10-day moving average for WFC crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on September 24, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 11 of 17 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 65%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where WFC declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 58%.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 2 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 22 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating low risk on high returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 20, placing this stock worse than average.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 57 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. WFC’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 59 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 62 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.523) is normal, around the industry mean (1.531). P/E Ratio (11.927) is within average values for comparable stocks, (11.865). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.264) is also within normal values, averaging (2.139). Dividend Yield (0.024) settles around the average of (0.034) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (3.144) is also within normal values, averaging (3.867).
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 75 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
C | JPM | WFC | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 11 | 28 | 33 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 31 Undervalued | 90 Overvalued | 62 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 15 | 9 | 22 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | 51 | 57 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 44 | 59 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
C's Valuation (31) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as WFC (62) in the Major Banks industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for JPM (90) in the Major Banks industry. This means that C's stock grew similarly to WFC’s and somewhat faster than JPM’s over the last 12 months.
JPM's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as C (15) in the Financial Conglomerates industry, and is in the same range as WFC (22) in the Major Banks industry. This means that JPM's stock grew similarly to C’s and similarly to WFC’s over the last 12 months.
JPM's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as C (1) in the Financial Conglomerates industry, and is in the same range as WFC (2) in the Major Banks industry. This means that JPM's stock grew similarly to C’s and similarly to WFC’s over the last 12 months.
JPM's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as C (56) in the Financial Conglomerates industry, and is in the same range as WFC (57) in the Major Banks industry. This means that JPM's stock grew similarly to C’s and similarly to WFC’s over the last 12 months.
JPM's P/E Growth Rating (44) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as C (47) in the Financial Conglomerates industry, and is in the same range as WFC (59) in the Major Banks industry. This means that JPM's stock grew similarly to C’s and similarly to WFC’s over the last 12 months.
| C | JPM | WFC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 58% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 61% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 67% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 68% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 50% | 1 day ago 54% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 7 days ago 60% | 1 day ago 61% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 64% | 23 days ago 59% | 10 days ago 58% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 45% | 1 day ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 52% | 1 day ago 59% | 2 days ago 61% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
C’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green while JPM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and WFC’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).
- C’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- JPM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- WFC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
C’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while JPM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and WFC’s TA Score reflects 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- C’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
- JPM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- WFC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
C (@Major Banks) experienced а -0.57% price change this week, while JPM (@Major Banks) price change was +0.30% , and WFC (@Major Banks) price fluctuated +0.31% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was -0.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.09%.
Reported Earning Dates
C is expected to report earnings on Jan 14, 2027.
JPM is expected to report earnings on Jan 14, 2027.
WFC is expected to report earnings on Jan 14, 2027.
Industries' Descriptions
@Major Banks (-0.25% weekly)Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.
Advertisement
C and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, C has been closely correlated with BAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if C jumps, then BAC could also see price increases.
JPM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JPM has been closely correlated with BAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if JPM jumps, then BAC could also see price increases.
WFC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WFC has been closely correlated with BAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WFC jumps, then BAC could also see price increases.