Advertisement
CVE or EQNR or TTE
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Cenovus Energy (CVE) vs. Equinor (EQNR) vs. TotalEnergies (TTE) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- CVE boasts the strongest year-to-date (YTD) performance at over 72%, surpassing EQNR's 70% and TTE's 42% amid elevated oil prices.
- TTE offers the highest dividend yield at 4.55% and lowest price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 13.77, appealing to income-focused investors.
- EQNR balances oil production with renewables growth, supported by recent project deals and share buybacks.
- All three stocks have benefited from recent oil price surges above $110 per barrel, driven by geopolitical tensions, but CVE shows superior short-term momentum with monthly gains around 9%.
- TTE leads in market cap at $207 billion, reflecting its global scale, while CVE trades at a relative value with a P/E of 18.64.
Introduction
Cenovus Energy (CVE), Equinor (EQNR), and TotalEnergies (TTE) represent key players in the energy sector, spanning integrated oil and gas operations with varying emphases on upstream production, refining, and renewables. This comparison is particularly relevant for traders and investors navigating volatile oil markets influenced by geopolitical events and supply dynamics. Amid recent oil price rallies, these stocks offer insights into relative performance, valuation, and growth potential, aiding decisions on sector exposure or portfolio diversification.
CVE Overview and Recent Performance
Cenovus Energy (CVE), a Canadian integrated oil company, focuses on low-cost oil sands production and conventional assets. In recent market activity, its shares have surged, closing near $29.27 with a 52-week range of $11.60 to $29.37 and YTD gains exceeding 72%. Momentum has been robust, with monthly advances around 9% and outperformance versus broader indices, fueled by high oil prices and operational efficiencies. Sentiment has improved on upcoming Q1 earnings, new drilling at acquired sites, and recognition as a momentum pick, though valuation checks highlight its multi-year rally.
EQNR Overview and Recent Performance
Equinor (EQNR), Norway's state-backed energy firm, operates offshore oil and gas fields while expanding renewables. Shares recently traded around $39.71, within a 52-week range of $22.26 to $43.46, delivering YTD returns of about 70%. Performance has been steady in recent weeks, with flat monthly changes but support from buybacks, dividends, and deals like FPSO engineering for Bay du Nord. Positive sentiment stems from North Sea discoveries and analyst upgrades, balancing hydrocarbon cash flows with energy transition efforts.
TTE Overview and Recent Performance
TotalEnergies (TTE), a French supermajor, provides global integrated energy solutions across upstream, refining, and low-carbon ventures. Its ADR closed near $92.78, in a 52-week span of $57.08 to $93.67, with YTD gains of 42%. Recent weeks showed resilience despite a slight monthly dip, bolstered by strong Q1 earnings, a 5.9% dividend hike, and solar project advancements in the Philippines. Investor interest reflects its scale and capital returns amid favorable oil dynamics.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases 25 top AI trading bots curated from over 350 total bots that scan thousands of tickers for real-time signals. These bots excel in current market conditions, boasting impressive stats like annualized returns up to 126%, win rates of 50-68%, profit factors around 1.5-3.3, and trade durations from minutes to weeks. Strategies vary widely—swing trading semiconductors with 97% annualized gains, data center plays at 70%, or energy portfolios at 76%—catering to short-term traders, momentum seekers, and sector specialists. Explore these high-performing bots to enhance your trading edge in dynamic environments.
Head-to-Head Comparison
CVE, EQNR, and TTE share oil price sensitivity but differ in models: CVE's upstream oil sands focus drives cost advantages and momentum, while EQNR blends North Sea production with offshore renewables, and TTE leverages downstream stability and global LNG. Growth drivers include TTE and EQNR's energy transition initiatives versus CVE's thermal efficiency. Recent momentum favors CVE, but TTE wins on valuation (P/E 13.77) and yield (4.55%), with EQNR at 3.93%. Risks involve commodity volatility and regulatory shifts; sentiment tilts toward diversified giants like TTE for stability.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron's AI currently leans toward CVE based on consistent upward trends, superior YTD momentum exceeding 72%, and relative valuation positioning amid strong oil catalysts. While TTE offers compelling income and scale, and EQNR stability, CVE's recent outperformance suggests higher near-term probability of gains in this environment.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CVE’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileEQNR’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s), and TTE’s FA Score reflects 3 green FA rating(s).
- CVE’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- EQNR’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- TTE’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CVE’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EQNR’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s), and TTE’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CVE’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- EQNR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- TTE’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CVE (@Integrated Oil) experienced а +0.18% price change this week, while EQNR (@Integrated Oil) price change was -2.06% , and TTE (@Integrated Oil) price fluctuated -0.78% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Integrated Oil industry was -4.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +27.22%.
Reported Earning Dates
CVE is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.
EQNR is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2026.
TTE is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Integrated Oil (-4.77% weekly)Integrated oil companies are involved across nearly the entire oil value chain – from upstream operations like exploration and production, to downstream functions of refining and marketing. Exxon Mobil Corporation, Chevron Corporation and BP are major integrated oil companies. Their bottom lines’ response to crude oil prices could depend on the proportion of upstream vs. downstream businesses; for example, if a company has substantial downstream business, the adverse impact on their upstream business due to falling crude prices could be mitigated by benefits to its downstream business.
| CVE | EQNR | TTE | |
| Capitalization | 52.7B | 91.4B | 196B |
| EBITDA | 11.5B | 39.6B | 43B |
| Gain YTD | 67.080 | 56.741 | 34.546 |
| P/E Ratio | 15.71 | 16.37 | 13.06 |
| Revenue | 51.9B | 104B | 184B |
| Total Cash | 2.58B | 20.1B | 29.9B |
| Total Debt | 13.8B | 31.9B | 64B |
CVE | EQNR | TTE | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 69 | 62 | 72 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 40 Fair valued | 25 Undervalued | 22 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 35 | 26 | 7 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 58 | 65 | 64 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | 44 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 32 | 12 | 31 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 85 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TTE's Valuation (22) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as EQNR (25) in the Integrated Oil industry, and is in the same range as CVE (40) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that TTE's stock grew similarly to EQNR’s and similarly to CVE’s over the last 12 months.
TTE's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as EQNR (26) in the Integrated Oil industry, and is in the same range as CVE (35) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that TTE's stock grew similarly to EQNR’s and similarly to CVE’s over the last 12 months.
CVE's SMR Rating (58) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as TTE (64) in the Integrated Oil industry, and is in the same range as EQNR (65) in the Integrated Oil industry. This means that CVE's stock grew similarly to TTE’s and similarly to EQNR’s over the last 12 months.
CVE's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as EQNR (44) in the Integrated Oil industry, and is in the same range as TTE (45) in the Integrated Oil industry. This means that CVE's stock grew similarly to EQNR’s and similarly to TTE’s over the last 12 months.
EQNR's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as TTE (31) in the Integrated Oil industry, and is in the same range as CVE (32) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that EQNR's stock grew similarly to TTE’s and similarly to CVE’s over the last 12 months.
| CVE | EQNR | TTE | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 67% | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 67% | 4 days ago 57% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 56% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 60% | 4 days ago 46% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 58% | 4 days ago 47% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 58% | 4 days ago 46% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 78% | 13 days ago 69% | 12 days ago 54% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 67% | 4 days ago 60% | 5 days ago 48% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 67% | N/A | 4 days ago 55% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 55% | 4 days ago 51% |
Advertisement
CVE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CVE has been closely correlated with SU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CVE jumps, then SU could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CVE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE | 100% | -0.74% | ||
| SU - CVE | 81% Closely correlated | -0.32% | ||
| CRGY - CVE | 78% Closely correlated | +0.87% | ||
| IMO - CVE | 72% Closely correlated | +0.26% | ||
| EQNR - CVE | 69% Closely correlated | -1.55% | ||
| XOM - CVE | 67% Closely correlated | +0.28% | ||
More | ||||
EQNR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EQNR has been closely correlated with BP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EQNR jumps, then BP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EQNR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EQNR | 100% | -1.55% | ||
| BP - EQNR | 74% Closely correlated | +0.23% | ||
| SU - EQNR | 71% Closely correlated | -0.32% | ||
| XOM - EQNR | 70% Closely correlated | +0.28% | ||
| CVE - EQNR | 69% Closely correlated | -0.74% | ||
| SHEL - EQNR | 68% Closely correlated | -0.22% | ||
More | ||||
TTE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TTE has been loosely correlated with CRGY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TTE jumps, then CRGY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TTE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTE | 100% | +0.34% | ||
| CRGY - TTE | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.87% | ||
| E - TTE | 52% Loosely correlated | -1.04% | ||
| SHEL - TTE | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.22% | ||
| BP - TTE | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.23% | ||
| EQNR - TTE | 45% Loosely correlated | -1.55% | ||
More | ||||