This comparison examines three publicly traded tanker companies—ECO, INSW, and NAT—that operate fleets transporting crude oil and petroleum products. These stocks appeal to investors seeking exposure to the energy shipping sector, where returns often correlate with global trade volumes, oil market dynamics, and supply-chain efficiencies. Traders and portfolio managers monitoring cyclical industries or dividend-focused strategies may find this relative performance analysis useful for assessing sector positioning and risk factors in the current environment.
Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. owns and operates a fleet of modern Suezmax and VLCC tankers focused on crude oil transportation. In recent market activity, the stock has reflected broader tanker sector strength driven by solid first-quarter earnings, with revenues and profits significantly higher than the prior-year period. Factors influencing sentiment include sustained charter rates and fleet utilization amid steady global energy demand. Recent weeks have seen price movements aligned with industry peers, as investors weighed operational results against macroeconomic variables such as oil price volatility.
International Seaways, Inc. manages one of the larger independent tanker fleets, transporting crude oil and petroleum products across international routes. Recent performance benefited from strong first-quarter results, including elevated net income and adjusted EBITDA, alongside the declaration of a historically large quarterly dividend. Sentiment in recent weeks has been supported by consistent capital returns to shareholders and favorable operating metrics, though the stock remains responsive to freight rate fluctuations and seasonal demand patterns typical of the sector.
Nordic American Tankers Limited owns and charters double-hull tankers primarily for crude oil transport. The stock has demonstrated notable year-to-date gains in recent market activity, outpacing broader benchmarks amid sector-wide tailwinds. Performance drivers include steady operational execution and dividend distributions, with price behavior in recent weeks influenced by ongoing energy transportation needs and investor rotation into shipping equities. Broader timeframe references highlight resilience relative to market averages during periods of elevated tanker demand.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of high-performing AI trading bots from hundreds available on the platform. These bots trade thousands of different tickers using diverse strategies, timeframes, and performance statistics tailored to current market conditions. Only the most suitable and effective ones earn placement in the trending section, offering users access to varied approaches with transparent historical metrics and risk profiles. This resource can help traders explore automated strategies aligned with specific stock universes. Visit Trending AI Robots to review the latest curated options.
Business models across ECO, INSW, and NAT center on tanker ownership and chartering, yet differ in fleet scale and vessel types, creating trade-offs in operational leverage and earnings stability. Growth drivers include global oil demand and geopolitical shipping dynamics, with INSW emphasizing larger-scale operations and capital returns, while ECO and NAT focus on efficient fleet deployment. Recent momentum has favored all three amid strong quarterly results, though NAT showed more pronounced year-to-date appreciation. Risk factors encompass freight rate cyclicality, fuel costs, and regulatory changes in maritime emissions. Sector exposure remains uniform within energy transportation, while valuation sensitivity varies with dividend policies and earnings multiples. Market sentiment reflects cautious optimism tied to verifiable earnings beats rather than speculative forecasts.
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency in recent quarters, earnings stability, and relative positioning within the tanker sector, Tickeron’s AI models currently assign a probabilistic edge to INSW due to its combination of robust reported results, substantial dividend distributions, and scale advantages. This assessment incorporates data-driven signals rather than guarantees, acknowledging that all three names remain subject to shared industry variables that could alter relative trajectories.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ECO’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileINSW’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s), and NAT’s FA Score reflects 3 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ECO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while INSW’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and NAT’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
ECO (@Marine Shipping) experienced а +8.92% price change this week, while INSW (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was +9.77% , and NAT (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price fluctuated +17.03% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was -0.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.97%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +1.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.77%.
ECO is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.
INSW is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2026.
NAT is expected to report earnings on Aug 31, 2026.
The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.
@Oil & Gas Pipelines (+1.21% weekly)Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.
| ECO | INSW | NAT | |
| Capitalization | 2.16B | 4.45B | 1.37B |
| EBITDA | 283M | 750M | 90.6M |
| Gain YTD | 79.249 | 102.222 | 101.990 |
| P/E Ratio | 9.66 | 8.05 | 24.01 |
| Revenue | 482M | 985M | 331M |
| Total Cash | 126M | N/A | N/A |
| Total Debt | 683M | 610M | 424M |
ECO | INSW | NAT | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 21 | 23 | 30 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 3 Undervalued | 17 Undervalued | 7 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 7 | 11 | 16 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 27 | 35 | 67 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | 36 | 36 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | 27 | 21 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 85 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ECO's Valuation (3) in the null industry is in the same range as NAT (7) in the Marine Shipping industry, and is in the same range as INSW (17) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that ECO's stock grew similarly to NAT’s and similarly to INSW’s over the last 12 months.
ECO's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the null industry is in the same range as INSW (11) in the Marine Shipping industry, and is in the same range as NAT (16) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that ECO's stock grew similarly to INSW’s and similarly to NAT’s over the last 12 months.
ECO's SMR Rating (27) in the null industry is in the same range as INSW (35) in the Marine Shipping industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for NAT (67) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that ECO's stock grew similarly to INSW’s and somewhat faster than NAT’s over the last 12 months.
INSW's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as NAT (36) in the Marine Shipping industry, and is in the same range as ECO (37) in the null industry. This means that INSW's stock grew similarly to NAT’s and similarly to ECO’s over the last 12 months.
NAT's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as INSW (27) in the Marine Shipping industry, and is in the same range as ECO (49) in the null industry. This means that NAT's stock grew similarly to INSW’s and similarly to ECO’s over the last 12 months.
| ECO | INSW | NAT | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 50% | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 49% | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 54% | 21 days ago 69% | 21 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 68% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BILT | 28.01 | 0.12 | +0.43% |
| iShares Infrastructure Active ETF | |||
| IBDX | 25.09 | 0.03 | +0.12% |
| iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Corp ETF | |||
| BEMB | 53.40 | -0.06 | -0.11% |
| iShares J.P. Morgan Brd USD Emr MktBdETF | |||
| FLRG | 40.30 | -0.33 | -0.81% |
| Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF | |||
| ABFL | 82.68 | -2.01 | -2.37% |
| Abacus FCF Leaders ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ECO has been closely correlated with NAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ECO jumps, then NAT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ECO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ECO | 100% | +3.00% | ||
| NAT - ECO | 73% Closely correlated | +4.03% | ||
| HAFN - ECO | 69% Closely correlated | +0.40% | ||
| ASC - ECO | 67% Closely correlated | +1.88% | ||
| NMM - ECO | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.96% | ||
| BWLP - ECO | 50% Loosely correlated | +0.79% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NAT has been closely correlated with FRO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NAT jumps, then FRO could also see price increases.