EMA
Price
$49.28
Change
-$0.10 (-0.20%)
Updated
Sep 18 closing price
Capitalization
15.15B
47 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FTS
Price
$54.10
Change
-$0.38 (-0.70%)
Updated
Sep 18 closing price
Capitalization
27.67B
33 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SO
Price
$85.52
Change
-$1.24 (-1.43%)
Updated
Sep 18 closing price
Capitalization
98.38B
39 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

EMA or FTS or SO

EMA vs FTS vs SO Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SO($98.4B) has a higher market cap than FTS($27.7B) and EMA($15.2B). FTS and EMA has higher P/E ratio than SO: FTS (22.26) and EMA (21.89) vs SO (20.61). FTS YTD gains are higher at: 5.016 vs. SO (0.485) and EMA (0.081). SO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 14.8B vs. FTS (5.96B) and EMA (3.51B). SO has more cash in the bank: 2.98B vs. EMA (396M) and FTS (384M). EMA has less debt than FTS and SO: EMA (22.1B) vs FTS (36.3B) and SO (77.1B). SO has higher revenues than FTS and EMA: SO (30.2B) vs FTS (12.4B) and EMA (8.94B).
EMAFTSSO
Capitalization15.2B27.7B98.4B
EBITDA3.51B5.96B14.8B
Gain YTD0.0815.0160.485
P/E Ratio21.8922.2620.61
Revenue8.94B12.4B30.2B
Total Cash396M384M2.98B
Total Debt22.1B36.3B77.1B
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EMA vs FTS vs SO: Fundamental Ratings
EMA
FTS
SO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
838461
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
30
Undervalued
55
Fair valued
43
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
906524
SMR RATING
1..100
777862
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
585660
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
372957
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75n/a65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EMA's Valuation (30) in the null industry is in the same range as SO (43) in the Electric Utilities industry, and is in the same range as FTS (55) in the null industry. This means that EMA's stock grew similarly to SO’s and similarly to FTS’s over the last 12 months.

SO's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the Electric Utilities industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FTS (65) in the null industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for EMA (90) in the null industry. This means that SO's stock grew somewhat faster than FTS’s and significantly faster than EMA’s over the last 12 months.

SO's SMR Rating (62) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as EMA (77) in the null industry, and is in the same range as FTS (78) in the null industry. This means that SO's stock grew similarly to EMA’s and similarly to FTS’s over the last 12 months.

FTS's Price Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as EMA (58) in the null industry, and is in the same range as SO (60) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that FTS's stock grew similarly to EMA’s and similarly to SO’s over the last 12 months.

FTS's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the null industry is in the same range as EMA (37) in the null industry, and is in the same range as SO (57) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that FTS's stock grew similarly to EMA’s and similarly to SO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EMAFTSSO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
31%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
39%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
28%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 20, 2026
Stock price -- (EMA: $49.28FTS: $54.10SO: $85.52)
Brand notoriety: EMA and FTS are not notable and SO is notable
The three companies represent the Electric Utilities industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EMA: 79%, FTS: 91%, SO: 271%
Market capitalization -- EMA: $15.15B, FTS: $27.67B, SO: $98.38B
$EMA is valued at $15.15B, while FTS has a market capitalization of $27.67B, and SO's market capitalization is $98.38B. The market cap for tickers in this @Electric Utilities ranges from $300 to $167.86B. The average market capitalization across the @Electric Utilities industry is $29.31B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EMA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while FTS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and SO’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EMA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FTS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SO is a better buy in the long-term than EMA, which in turn is a better option than FTS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EMA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FTS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and SO’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EMA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FTS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EMA and SO are a better buy in the short-term than FTS.

Price Growth

EMA (@Electric Utilities) experienced а +0.18% price change this week, while FTS (@Electric Utilities) price change was -0.50% , and SO (@Electric Utilities) price fluctuated -1.89% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was -2.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.95%.

Reported Earning Dates

EMA is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2026.

FTS is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2026.

SO is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electric Utilities (-2.97% weekly)

Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.

View a ticker or compare two or three
EMA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FTS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OPY115.170.87
+0.76%
Oppenheimer Holdings
ENB48.73-0.02
-0.04%
Enbridge
EPRT26.75-0.05
-0.19%
Essential Properties Realty Trust
BCYC3.65-0.03
-0.82%
Bicycle Therapeutics plc
RADX1.63-0.10
-5.78%
Radiopharm Theranostics Limited

EMA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EMA has been closely correlated with FTS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EMA jumps, then FTS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMA
1D Price
Change %
EMA100%
-0.20%
FTS - EMA
76%
Closely correlated
-0.70%
ED - EMA
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.54%
DUK - EMA
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.85%
AEE - EMA
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.61%
SO - EMA
59%
Loosely correlated
-1.43%
More

SO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SO has been closely correlated with DUK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SO jumps, then DUK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SO
1D Price
Change %
SO100%
-1.43%
DUK - SO
85%
Closely correlated
-0.85%
CMS - SO
80%
Closely correlated
-1.30%
AEE - SO
78%
Closely correlated
-1.61%
LNT - SO
78%
Closely correlated
-1.55%
WEC - SO
76%
Closely correlated
-1.49%
More