ET
Price
$20.76
Change
-$0.19 (-0.91%)
Updated
Aug 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
72.09B
83 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
LNG
Price
$266.51
Change
-$1.60 (-0.60%)
Updated
Aug 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
55.37B
77 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WMB
Price
$73.05
Change
-$0.65 (-0.88%)
Updated
Aug 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
90.15B
81 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ET or LNG or WMB

ET vs LNG vs WMB Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 03, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Energy Transfer (ET) vs. Cheniere Energy (LNG) vs. Williams Companies (WMB) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Energy Transfer (ET), Cheniere Energy (LNG), and Williams Companies (WMB) are all major players in the U.S. natural gas midstream sector, benefiting from rising domestic production and export demand.
  • ET recently raised its quarterly distribution by 3% to $0.34 per unit amid consistent midstream volume growth and multiple analyst price target increases in recent weeks.
  • LNG has delivered the strongest recent momentum, with shares rising approximately 11.6% over the past 30 days alongside continued share repurchase activity and upcoming earnings.
  • WMB announced a 5% dividend increase to an annualized $2.10 per share and released its 2025 sustainability report highlighting operational improvements in late July 2026.
  • All three stocks trade above key moving averages and have posted double-digit year-to-date gains, though LNG leads in percentage terms while ET offers the highest current yield.
  • Relative positioning favors stability and distribution growth for ET, export-linked growth for LNG, and diversified pipeline exposure for WMB in the current energy environment.

Introduction

Energy Transfer (ET), Cheniere Energy (LNG), and Williams Companies (WMB) represent leading midstream energy companies with significant exposure to natural gas transportation, processing, and liquefaction. This comparison examines their recent stock behavior, business models, and market positioning to assist institutional and retail investors evaluating sector allocation decisions. Traders monitoring relative performance within energy infrastructure may find the analysis useful for identifying differences in momentum, yield profiles, and sensitivity to commodity and regulatory developments.

ET Overview and Recent Performance

Energy Transfer (ET) operates one of the largest midstream networks in the United States, focused on natural gas, crude oil, and NGL transportation and storage. In recent market activity, the company announced its nineteenth consecutive quarterly distribution increase to $0.34 per common unit. Shares have traded near the upper end of their 52-week range around $20.36 as of late July 2026, supported by volume growth and analyst upgrades from firms including RBC Capital and TD Cowen. Sentiment has remained constructive amid preparations for second-quarter earnings and continued expansion projects along the Gulf Coast.

LNG Overview and Recent Performance

Cheniere Energy (LNG) is the largest U.S. liquefied natural gas exporter, operating major liquefaction facilities in Texas and Louisiana. The stock has shown notable strength in recent weeks, advancing roughly 11.6% over the past 30 days to close near $263.57 on July 31, 2026. Performance has been supported by operational momentum and ongoing capital return programs, including an expanded share repurchase authorization. The company is scheduled to report second-quarter results in early August, with market participants focused on export volumes and margin trends.

WMB Overview and Recent Performance

Williams Companies (WMB) provides natural gas gathering, processing, and interstate pipeline services across key producing basins. In late July 2026, the board approved a 5% increase in the quarterly dividend to $0.525 per share, bringing the annualized rate to $2.10. Shares closed at approximately $71.54 on July 31, reflecting steady gains year-to-date. Recent developments include the release of the company’s 2025 sustainability report emphasizing safety and emissions performance, ahead of second-quarter earnings expected shortly.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots designed to navigate thousands of tickers across equities, options, and other instruments. While Tickeron maintains hundreds of AI Trading Bots with varied trading styles, strategies, timeframes, and performance statistics, only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing market conditions are featured in the Trending AI Robots section. Available bots exhibit a wide range of win rates, drawdown profiles, and trade frequencies, allowing users to review detailed backtested metrics before deployment. For traders seeking automated strategies that adapt to current volatility and sector trends, the platform offers transparent performance data across multiple approaches. Explore the full collection at Trending AI Robots.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Energy Transfer (ET), Cheniere Energy (LNG), and Williams Companies (WMB) share exposure to U.S. natural gas infrastructure but differ in business emphasis. ET and WMB focus primarily on midstream transportation and gathering, generating stable fee-based revenues, while LNG derives a larger portion of earnings from liquefaction and global exports, introducing greater sensitivity to international LNG pricing. Recent momentum has favored LNG on a percentage basis, whereas ET has delivered distribution growth and multiple analyst target raises. WMB combines pipeline stability with dividend growth and sustainability initiatives. Valuation sensitivity varies: ET trades at a higher yield with lower share price volatility, LNG commands a premium valuation tied to export growth, and WMB reflects balanced exposure to domestic demand. Market sentiment across the group remains supported by infrastructure needs, though LNG’s export orientation creates distinct catalyst potential compared with the more domestically oriented peers.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable trend consistency and relative positioning in recent market activity, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a probabilistic edge to Cheniere Energy (LNG). The stock’s stronger percentage gains over the past 30 days, combined with sustained operational catalysts and capital return programs, suggest more favorable near-term momentum alignment compared with the steadier but less accelerated profiles of Energy Transfer (ET) and Williams Companies (WMB). This assessment reflects current data patterns rather than forward predictions.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 13, 2026
Stock price -- (ET: $20.95LNG: $268.11WMB: $73.70)
Brand notoriety: ET and LNG are notable and WMB is not notable
The three companies represent the Oil & Gas Pipelines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ET: 99%, LNG: 69%, WMB: 64%
Market capitalization -- ET: $72.09B, LNG: $55.37B, WMB: $90.15B
$ET is valued at $72.09B, while LNG has a market capitalization of $55.37B, and WMB's market capitalization is $90.15B. The market cap for tickers in this @Oil & Gas Pipelines ranges from $112.44B to $0. The average market capitalization across the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry is $16.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ET’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLNG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and WMB’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ET’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • LNG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WMB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, LNG is a better buy in the long-term than WMB, which in turn is a better option than ET.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ET’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LNG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and WMB’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ET’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LNG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • WMB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WMB is a better buy in the short-term than ET and LNG.

Price Growth

ET (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а +4.72% price change this week, while LNG (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was +5.47% , and WMB (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price fluctuated +2.63% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +3.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.26%.

Reported Earning Dates

ET is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.

LNG is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.

WMB is expected to report earnings on Nov 02, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Pipelines (+3.36% weekly)

Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WMB($90.1B) has a higher market cap than ET($72.1B) and LNG($55.4B). WMB has higher P/E ratio than LNG and ET: WMB (29.36) vs LNG (20.31) and ET (14.35). LNG YTD gains are higher at: 38.910 vs. ET (33.863) and WMB (24.402). ET has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 17.4B vs. LNG (7.89B) and WMB (7.67B). LNG has less debt than WMB and ET: LNG (26.4B) vs WMB (30.3B) and ET (71.1B). ET has higher revenues than LNG and WMB: ET (107B) vs LNG (21.5B) and WMB (11.9B).
ETLNGWMB
Capitalization72.1B55.4B90.1B
EBITDA17.4B7.89B7.67B
Gain YTD33.86338.91024.402
P/E Ratio14.3520.3129.36
Revenue107B21.5B11.9B
Total CashN/A308MN/A
Total Debt71.1B26.4B30.3B
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ET vs LNG vs WMB: Fundamental Ratings
ET
LNG
WMB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
406625
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
7
Undervalued
46
Fair valued
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9142
SMR RATING
1..100
994744
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
454653
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
431550
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
504750

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ET's Valuation (7) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as WMB (24) and is somewhat better than the same rating for LNG (46). This means that ET's stock grew similarly to WMB’s and somewhat faster than LNG’s over the last 12 months.

WMB's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as ET (9) and is in the same range as LNG (14). This means that WMB's stock grew similarly to ET’s and similarly to LNG’s over the last 12 months.

WMB's SMR Rating (44) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as LNG (47) and is somewhat better than the same rating for ET (99). This means that WMB's stock grew similarly to LNG’s and somewhat faster than ET’s over the last 12 months.

ET's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as LNG (46) and is in the same range as WMB (53). This means that ET's stock grew similarly to LNG’s and similarly to WMB’s over the last 12 months.

LNG's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as ET (43) and is somewhat better than the same rating for WMB (50). This means that LNG's stock grew similarly to ET’s and somewhat faster than WMB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ETLNGWMB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
42%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
31%
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ET
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
LNG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WMB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LGN68.683.71
+5.71%
Legence Corp
WBD27.650.58
+2.14%
Warner Bros Discovery
GIGM1.470.02
+1.38%
GigaMedia Limited
CFFN8.880.07
+0.79%
Capitol Federal Financial
BYND0.41N/A
-0.84%
Beyond Meat

ET and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ET has been loosely correlated with OKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ET jumps, then OKE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ET
1D Price
Change %
ET100%
+0.82%
OKE - ET
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.04%
EPD - ET
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.16%
KMI - ET
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.79%
WES - ET
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.10%
TRGP - ET
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.21%
More

LNG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LNG has been loosely correlated with OKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LNG jumps, then OKE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LNG
1D Price
Change %
LNG100%
+1.01%
OKE - LNG
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.04%
KMI - LNG
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.79%
WMB - LNG
46%
Loosely correlated
+1.92%
KNTK - LNG
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.27%
ET - LNG
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.82%
More

WMB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WMB has been closely correlated with KMI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WMB jumps, then KMI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WMB
1D Price
Change %
WMB100%
+1.92%
KMI - WMB
82%
Closely correlated
+0.79%
AM - WMB
78%
Closely correlated
+0.63%
DTM - WMB
75%
Closely correlated
+0.99%
TRGP - WMB
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.21%
TRP - WMB
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.05%
More