FTXL
Price
$265.47
Change
-$17.23 (-6.09%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Net Assets
2.84B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
IYW
Price
$239.66
Change
-$4.33 (-1.77%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Net Assets
26.78B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VGT
Price
$113.86
Change
-$1.61 (-1.39%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Net Assets
170.1B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FTXL or IYW or VGT

FTXL vs IYW vs VGT Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL) vs. iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW) vs. Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT)

Key Takeaways

  • FTXL offers targeted exposure to ~35 U.S. semiconductor firms via a smart beta index blending value, volatility, and growth factors, but at a higher 0.60% expense ratio.
  • IYW and VGT provide broad U.S. technology sector coverage with 139 and 317 holdings respectively, emphasizing large-cap leaders like NVDA and AAPL.
  • VGT stands out for cost efficiency (0.09% expense ratio) and deepest diversification, reducing concentration risk compared to more top-heavy IYW and pure-play FTXL.
  • FTXL exhibits higher volatility due to semiconductor focus, while VGT and IYW show greater stability amid sector rotations.
  • All three benefit from AI-driven demand, but broader funds like VGT balance mega-cap momentum with mid-cap resilience.
  • Tickeron’s AI favors VGT for superior risk-adjusted positioning and low costs in the current environment.

Introduction

FTXL, IYW, and VGT represent tiered approaches to the booming U.S. technology landscape, where AI infrastructure and data center expansion dominate capital flows. FTXL delivers concentrated semiconductor exposure through a factor-based strategy, ideal for capturing chip cycle upswings. In contrast, IYW and VGT track broad technology indexes, with IYW favoring large-cap leaders via a capped market-cap methodology and VGT encompassing large-, mid-, and small-cap names for enhanced diversification. These ETFs compete in a sector propelled by generative AI demand but diverge in risk profiles: FTXL's niche tilt amplifies volatility, while IYW and VGT offer scaled stability. Comparing them aids investors navigating tech's structural growth amid macroeconomic shifts like interest rate trajectories and supply chain onshoring.

First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL) Overview

The First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL) seeks investment results tracking the Nasdaq U.S. Smart Semiconductor Index, a multi-factor benchmark selecting liquid U.S. semiconductor companies based on value, volatility, and growth metrics. Launched in 2016, it holds approximately 35 stocks, fostering concentration with top holdings including INTC (~14%), MU (~9%), QCOM (~8%), AVGO (~7%), and NVDA (~6-7%), comprising over 60% of assets. Sector allocation is nearly 100% semiconductors within technology. The expense ratio is 0.60%, reflecting its smart beta (factor-weighted) passive structure. FTXL rebalances periodically to maintain factor tilts, emphasizing liquidity and capitalization within the subsector for targeted purity over broad diversification.

iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW) Overview

The iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW) tracks the Russell 1000 Technology RIC 22.5/45 Capped Index, a modified market-cap weighted benchmark of large- and mid-cap U.S. technology equities with concentration caps to limit dominance. Inception in 2000, it features 139 holdings, with top positions dominated by NVDA (~16%), AAPL (~14%), Alphabet Class A (~8%), Alphabet Class C (~6%), and MSFT (~4%), accounting for ~64% of the portfolio. Allocation skews heavily to software, semiconductors, and hardware. Expense ratio stands at 0.38%, supporting its passive, cap-constrained strategy that mitigates extreme mega-cap risk while prioritizing sector leaders.

Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) Overview

The Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) follows the MSCI US Investable Market Information Technology 25/50 Index, capturing large-, mid-, and small-cap U.S. information technology stocks with issuer weight caps. Since 2004, it maintains 317-324 holdings for broad exposure, led by NVDA (~19%), AAPL (~16%), MSFT (~10%), AVGO (~4%), and MU (~2%), totaling ~59%. Subsector breakdown includes semiconductors (~34%), technology hardware (~19%), systems software (~15%), and application software (~11%). With a low 0.09% expense ratio, VGT employs full replication or sampling for its passive, non-diversified structure, offering liquidity and comprehensive sector representation.

Industry and Thematic Landscape

The technology and semiconductor sectors underpinning FTXL, IYW, and VGT face a transformative environment driven by AI infrastructure buildout. Hyperscalers' capital expenditures exceed $100 billion quarterly, funneling into high-bandwidth memory (HBM), GPUs, and accelerators, propelling semiconductor revenues toward $1 trillion in 2026. Earnings growth in holdings like NVDA and AMD stems from data center demand, though classic markets like PCs lag. Macro drivers include sustained U.S. interest rate stability aiding growth stocks, alongside CHIPS Act subsidies ($52 billion) spurring domestic fabs amid U.S.-China tensions. Geopolitical risks involve export controls on advanced nodes, while sector vulnerabilities encompass supply chain bottlenecks in advanced packaging and energy constraints for data centers. Capital rotates toward AI enablers, rewarding subsector leaders.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent months, FTXL has shown elevated volatility tied to semiconductor cycles, outperforming during AI chip rallies but experiencing sharper drawdowns amid supply concerns. IYW, with its large-cap bias, has captured mega-cap momentum from NVDA and AAPL, delivering consistent trends but higher concentration risk. VGT's broader holdings have tempered swings, exhibiting lower relative volatility through mid-cap participation and stability in software/services. Performance divergences arise from FTXL's pure subsector focus amplifying chip demand sensitivity, versus IYW and VGT's diluted exposure to diversified tech earnings. All three trend upward with AI tailwinds, though VGT's scale enhances liquidity and drawdown resilience during macro rotations.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization (market cap), technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening, empowering data-backed decisions across asset classes. Explore it today to uncover hidden gems in tech and beyond.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors VGT, citing its unmatched cost efficiency (0.09% expense ratio), extensive diversification (317+ holdings), and balanced risk-adjusted profile. These structural edges enable stable momentum capture amid AI-driven cycles, with ~65% modeled probability of outperforming peers over multi-month horizons based on liquidity, lower volatility, and broad exposure.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VGT has more net assets: 170B vs. IYW (26.8B) and FTXL (2.84B). FTXL has a higher annual dividend yield than VGT and IYW: FTXL (104.985) vs VGT (20.986) and IYW (20.101). FTXL was incepted earlier than IYW and VGT: FTXL (10 years) vs IYW (26 years) and VGT (22 years). VGT (0.09) has a lower expense ratio than IYW (0.38) and FTXL (0.60). FTXL has a higher turnover VGT (8.00) and IYW (7.00) vs VGT (8.00) and IYW (7.00).
FTXLIYWVGT
Gain YTD104.98520.10120.986
Net Assets2.84B26.8B170B
Total Expense Ratio0.600.380.09
Turnover19.007.008.00
Yield0.130.110.32
Fund Existence10 years26 years22 years
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FTXLIYWVGT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FTXL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
IYW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VGT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ISBG10.800.14
+1.33%
Incomestkd 1X Bitcoin & 1X Gold Premium ETF
BGB11.280.01
+0.09%
Blackstone Strategic Credit 2027 Term Fund
EOCT33.97-0.02
-0.06%
Innovator Emerg Mkts Pwr Bffr ETF™-Oct
QCOC23.70-0.05
-0.21%
FT Vest Nasdaq-100® Cnsrv Buffr ETF -Oct
FBCG59.77-0.44
-0.73%
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF

FTXL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTXL has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FTXL jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FTXL
1D Price
Change %
FTXL100%
-6.09%
LRCX - FTXL
86%
Closely correlated
-5.66%
AMAT - FTXL
83%
Closely correlated
-6.16%
MPWR - FTXL
82%
Closely correlated
-8.69%
KLAC - FTXL
81%
Closely correlated
-3.93%
MU - FTXL
81%
Closely correlated
-6.69%
More

VGT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VGT has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VGT jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VGT
1D Price
Change %
VGT100%
-1.39%
NVDA - VGT
77%
Closely correlated
-1.64%
LRCX - VGT
70%
Closely correlated
-5.66%
CEVA - VGT
70%
Closely correlated
-3.77%
AVGO - VGT
70%
Closely correlated
-3.67%
KLAC - VGT
68%
Closely correlated
-3.93%
More