Advertisement
FUTU or IBKR or TIGR
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Futu Holdings (FUTU) vs. Interactive Brokers (IBKR) vs. UP Fintech (TIGR) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- FUTU, IBKR, and TIGR are all online brokerages serving retail investors, with FUTU and TIGR having greater exposure to Chinese clients and thus heightened regulatory sensitivity.
- Recent market activity shows FUTU and TIGR experiencing sharp volatility and declines tied to Chinese regulatory actions, including fines and compliance measures, while IBKR demonstrated relative stability and gains.
- IBKR reported consistent growth in client accounts, equity, and trading activity (DARTs) in recent periods, reflecting its broader global platform and diversified client base.
- Valuation and momentum contrasts highlight trade-offs: IBKR offers scale and lower perceived risk, whereas FUTU and TIGR provide higher growth potential offset by elevated regulatory and geopolitical exposure.
- Sector positioning remains centered on fintech brokerage services, with all three sensitive to trading volumes, interest rates, and cross-border capital flows.
- Market sentiment has shifted toward established players amid recent regulatory developments affecting the China-focused brokers.
Introduction
Online brokerage platforms have attracted significant investor interest as retail trading volumes fluctuate with market conditions and technological advancements. This comparison examines FUTU, IBKR, and TIGR—three publicly traded companies operating in this space. FUTU and TIGR focus on serving investors interested in global equities, particularly those from Asia, while IBKR provides a comprehensive platform for professional and retail traders worldwide. The analysis is relevant for traders and investors seeking to understand relative performance, risk profiles, and positioning within the competitive fintech brokerage sector amid evolving regulatory and economic environments.
FUTU Overview and Recent Performance
Futu Holdings Limited operates the Moomoo platform, offering commission-free trading and investment tools primarily to retail investors. In recent weeks, the stock displayed high volatility following announcements related to regulatory actions by Chinese authorities, including fines and adjustments to client asset ratios. These developments contributed to sharp price declines of approximately 25-30% in late May 2026 before partial rebounds. Broader market activity reflects ongoing sensitivity to cross-border trading policies and compliance costs, influencing short-term sentiment despite the company's established user base and product offerings.
IBKR Overview and Recent Performance
Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. provides a global electronic brokerage platform serving both retail and institutional clients across multiple asset classes. Recent market activity has shown steady upward momentum, with the stock advancing more than 12% over the past month amid positive brokerage metrics such as growth in daily average revenue trades (DARTs), client equity, and account numbers. The platform's diversified international reach and focus on professional tools have supported resilience, with limited direct exposure to the regulatory pressures affecting certain Asia-centric peers.
TIGR Overview and Recent Performance
UP Fintech Holding Limited operates the Tiger Brokers platform, targeting retail investors with access to global markets. Similar to its peer, the stock experienced notable volatility in recent weeks due to overlapping regulatory developments in China, including penalties and related compliance updates that pressured shares downward by 20-30% at points before modest recoveries. Performance reflects the company's growth in client assets and trading volumes over longer periods, tempered by short-term sentiment shifts tied to geopolitical and regulatory factors.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron maintains a curated selection of AI trading bots designed to operate across thousands of tickers under varying market conditions. While the platform offers hundreds of such bots with diverse trading styles, strategies, timeframes, performance statistics, and ticker sets, only those demonstrating strong suitability for prevailing conditions are featured in the Trending AI Robots section. Available bots span a wide range of metrics, including varying win rates, profit factors, and drawdown profiles that reflect their distinct approaches. This section provides traders with insights into automated strategies that align with current environments. For more details, visit Trending AI Robots.
Head-to-Head Comparison
The three companies share a core business model centered on online brokerage services but differ in scale, geographic focus, and risk exposure. FUTU and TIGR emphasize user-friendly platforms popular among Asian retail investors seeking U.S. and international equities, making them more directly sensitive to Chinese regulatory changes affecting cross-border flows. In contrast, IBKR operates a broader, institutionally oriented platform with global diversification that has contributed to more consistent client and equity growth. Recent momentum favors IBKR's stability amid shared sector headwinds, while FUTU and TIGR present higher-beta profiles tied to policy developments. Valuation sensitivity appears greater for the smaller, China-exposed names, with market sentiment reflecting trade-offs between growth potential and regulatory resilience.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, operational stability, and relative positioning amid recent developments, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probabilistic preference to IBKR for its demonstrated resilience and diversified metrics compared with the more volatile trajectories of FUTU and TIGR. This assessment draws from relative performance patterns and sector exposures without implying definitive outcomes.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FUTU’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileIBKR’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and TIGR’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).
- FUTU’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- IBKR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- TIGR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FUTU’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IBKR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and TIGR’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FUTU’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
- IBKR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- TIGR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
FUTU (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +1.97% price change this week, while IBKR (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +1.72% , and TIGR (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price fluctuated +0.11% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -5.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.25%.
Reported Earning Dates
FUTU is expected to report earnings on Aug 26, 2026.
IBKR is expected to report earnings on Jul 21, 2026.
TIGR is expected to report earnings on Aug 27, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Banks/Brokers (-5.38% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
| FUTU | IBKR | TIGR | |
| Capitalization | 13.8B | 41.3B | 834M |
| EBITDA | 14.9B | 9.42B | 239M |
| Gain YTD | -39.425 | 47.562 | -51.308 |
| P/E Ratio | 11.04 | 41.55 | 7.72 |
| Revenue | 24B | 10.6B | 644M |
| Total Cash | 23.6B | 5.09B | 801M |
| Total Debt | 22.5B | 12M | 66.2M |
FUTU | IBKR | TIGR | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 5 | 35 | 4 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 12 Undervalued | 94 Overvalued | 68 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 8 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 35 | 45 | 58 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 37 | 64 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 89 | 20 | 94 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FUTU's Valuation (12) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TIGR (68) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for IBKR (94) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that FUTU's stock grew somewhat faster than TIGR’s and significantly faster than IBKR’s over the last 12 months.
IBKR's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is significantly better than the same rating for FUTU (100) in the null industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for TIGR (100) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that IBKR's stock grew significantly faster than FUTU’s and significantly faster than TIGR’s over the last 12 months.
FUTU's SMR Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as IBKR (45) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry, and is in the same range as TIGR (58) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that FUTU's stock grew similarly to IBKR’s and similarly to TIGR’s over the last 12 months.
IBKR's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as FUTU (62) in the null industry, and is in the same range as TIGR (64) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that IBKR's stock grew similarly to FUTU’s and similarly to TIGR’s over the last 12 months.
IBKR's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is significantly better than the same rating for FUTU (89) in the null industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for TIGR (94) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that IBKR's stock grew significantly faster than FUTU’s and significantly faster than TIGR’s over the last 12 months.
| FUTU | IBKR | TIGR | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 78% | 7 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 81% | 15 days ago 52% | 9 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 89% |
Advertisement
IBKR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IBKR has been closely correlated with HOOD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IBKR jumps, then HOOD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IBKR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBKR | 100% | -2.19% | ||
| HOOD - IBKR | 67% Closely correlated | -2.33% | ||
| RJF - IBKR | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.50% | ||
| MS - IBKR | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.47% | ||
| GS - IBKR | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.08% | ||
| SCHW - IBKR | 56% Loosely correlated | +1.24% | ||
More | ||||