These three ETFs compete within the precious metals mining sector, offering investors targeted exposure to gold and silver producers through distinct indexing approaches. GDXJ, SILJ, and SLVP do not track identical benchmarks but instead represent tiered strategies focused on junior miners and silver-related equities. Their relevance stems from ongoing interest in commodity-linked equities as inflation hedges and portfolio diversifiers amid fluctuating metal prices and supply constraints. The comparison highlights differences in diversification, cost, and thematic precision that help investors align selections with specific risk tolerances and sector views.
GDXJ tracks the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index, seeking to replicate the performance of small-capitalization companies primarily involved in gold and silver mining. The fund holds approximately 154 securities, with top positions including Coeur Mining Inc (CDE), Alamos Gold Inc (AGI), Equinox Gold Corp (EQX), Endeavour Mining Plc (EDV), and IAMGOLD Corp (IAG). Sector allocation centers overwhelmingly on basic materials. It carries a net expense ratio of 0.52% and employs a passive, market-capitalization-weighted methodology with quarterly rebalancing. Distinguishing features include its focus on junior miners, providing broader exposure to smaller companies than many peers in the precious metals space.
SILJ tracks the Nasdaq Junior Silver Miners Index, delivering exposure to companies engaged primarily in silver mining, production, or related exploration activities. The ETF maintains around 59 to 68 holdings, with leading positions such as Hecla Mining Co (HL), First Majestic Silver Corp (AG), Coeur Mining Inc (CDE), Wheaton Precious Metals Corp (WPM), and SSR Mining Inc (SSRM). Allocation remains concentrated in the materials sector. Its expense ratio stands at 0.69%, and the fund uses a passive thematic market-cap weighting approach with quarterly rebalancing. Key characteristics include its specialization in junior silver miners, positioning it as a more targeted vehicle within the silver segment.
SLVP tracks the MSCI ACWI Select Silver Miners Investable Market Index, aiming to capture global companies primarily engaged in silver mining. The fund contains approximately 36 to 42 holdings, featuring top allocations to Hecla Mining Co (HL), Industrias Penoles SAB de CV (PE&OLES), First Majestic Silver Corp (AG), Fresnillo PLC (FRES), and Aya Gold & Silver Inc (AYA). Sector exposure focuses on metals and mining. It features the lowest expense ratio among the group at 0.39% and applies a passive indexing strategy with market-cap weighting. Distinguishing elements include its global scope and inclusion of both silver and broader metals miners, resulting in a more compact portfolio.
The precious metals mining sector operates under influences from gold and silver price movements, driven by macroeconomic factors including interest rate expectations, inflation trends, and safe-haven demand. Capital flows into mining equities often accelerate during periods of currency weakness or geopolitical uncertainty, while regulatory developments in key producing regions such as Canada, Mexico, and Peru affect operational costs and project timelines. Earnings trends among major holdings reflect metal price volatility and production efficiencies, with supply constraints supporting long-term structural demand. Sector risks encompass environmental regulations, labor issues, and capital expenditure requirements for exploration and development.
In recent weeks and months, the ETFs have displayed differentiated behavior tied to their structural exposures. GDXJ's larger number of holdings has contributed to relatively smoother trend consistency and lower concentration risk compared to the more focused SILJ and SLVP. SILJ's silver-specific tilt has amplified sensitivity to silver price fluctuations, leading to potentially higher volatility in certain cycles. SLVP's lower expense ratio and compact structure may support more efficient capture of broad metals miner momentum, though its smaller holdings count increases drawdown potential during sector-specific corrections. Performance differentials arise primarily from varying degrees of gold versus silver emphasis and diversification levels, influencing responses to commodity price shifts and macroeconomic variables across recent market cycles.
Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking data-driven insights into ETFs like GDXJ, SILJ, and SLVP may find the platform useful for refining their research process.
Based on observable structural strength, diversification profile, cost efficiency, momentum stability, and risk-adjusted positioning, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign the highest probability of favor to VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ). Its combination of broad holdings, balanced gold-silver exposure, and moderate expense ratio supports more resilient positioning relative to the higher-cost, silver-concentrated SILJ or the lower-cost but narrower SLVP.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
The 10-day moving average for GDXJ crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on October 02, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 13 of 14 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on September 23, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on GDXJ as a result. In 68 of 78 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 87%.
GDXJ moved below its 50-day moving average on September 28, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where GDXJ declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 86%.
The Aroon Indicator for GDXJ entered a downward trend on October 23, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The RSI Indicator entered the oversold zone -- be on the watch for GDXJ's price rising or consolidating in the future. That's also the time to consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 1 day, which means it's wise to expect a price bounce in the near future.
The 50-day moving average for GDXJ moved above the 200-day moving average on October 08, 2026. This could be a long-term bullish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an upward trend.
Following a +4.93% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where GDXJ advanced for three days, in 268 of 296 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.
GDXJ may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
SILJ moved below its 50-day moving average on September 28, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 34 of 36 similar past instances, the stock price decreased further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.
The 10-day moving average for SILJ crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on September 30, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 15 of 15 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where SILJ declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 89%.
The Aroon Indicator for SILJ entered a downward trend on October 23, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The RSI Indicator demonstrates that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 1 day, which means it's wise to expect a price bounce in the near future.
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 1 day, which means it's wise to expect a price bounce in the near future.
Following a +3.72% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where SILJ advanced for three days, in 282 of 308 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.
SILJ may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The 10-day moving average for SLVP crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on October 02, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 12 of 13 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.
SLVP moved below its 50-day moving average on September 28, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where SLVP declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 87%.
The Aroon Indicator for SLVP entered a downward trend on October 23, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The RSI Indicator demonstrates that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 1 day, which means it's wise to expect a price bounce in the near future.
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 1 day, which means it's wise to expect a price bounce in the near future.
The 50-day moving average for SLVP moved above the 200-day moving average on September 30, 2026. This could be a long-term bullish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an upward trend.
Following a +4.76% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where SLVP advanced for three days, in 287 of 310 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.
SLVP may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
| GDXJ | SILJ | SLVP | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 90% | 9 days ago 90% | 9 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 87% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 88% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BZZ | 19.68 | 0.29 | +1.49% |
| Corgi Drones & Urban Air Mobility ETF (BZZ) | |||
| MMIT | 23.53 | 0.03 | +0.13% |
| NYLIM MacKay Muni Intermediate ETF (MMIT) | |||
| OVLH | 41.98 | -0.15 | -0.36% |
| Overlay Shares Hedged Large Cap Equity ETF (OVLH) | |||
| SUIS | 25.22 | -0.10 | -0.38% |
| Canary Staked SUIS ETF (SUIS) | |||
| DIVN | 31.75 | -0.16 | -0.50% |
| Horizon Dividend Income ETF (DIVN) | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GDXJ has been closely correlated with KGC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GDXJ jumps, then KGC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GDXJ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GDXJ | 100% | -1.83% | ||
| KGC - GDXJ | 93% Closely correlated | -1.50% | ||
| PAAS - GDXJ | 93% Closely correlated | -2.24% | ||
| FSM - GDXJ | 92% Closely correlated | -3.57% | ||
| CGAU - GDXJ | 92% Closely correlated | -1.22% | ||
| EQX - GDXJ | 92% Closely correlated | -2.41% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SILJ has been closely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 94% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SILJ jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SILJ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SILJ | 100% | -2.11% | ||
| PAAS - SILJ | 94% Closely correlated | -2.24% | ||
| WPM - SILJ | 92% Closely correlated | -2.14% | ||
| CDE - SILJ | 92% Closely correlated | -3.10% | ||
| SKE - SILJ | 90% Closely correlated | -2.51% | ||
| OR - SILJ | 88% Closely correlated | -1.44% | ||
More | ||||