GLW
Price
$47.98
Change
+$0.09 (+0.19%)
Updated
Dec 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
39 days until earnings call
JNPR
Price
$37.50
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
39 days until earnings call
QCOM
Price
$158.42
Change
-$0.94 (-0.59%)
Updated
Dec 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
33 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

GLW or JNPR or QCOM

Header iconGLW vs JNPR vs QCOM Comparison
Open Charts GLW vs JNPR vs QCOMBanner chart's image
Corning
Price$47.98
Change+$0.09 (+0.19%)
Volume$13.8K
CapitalizationN/A
Juniper Networks
Price$37.50
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$11.22K
CapitalizationN/A
QUALCOMM
Price$158.42
Change-$0.94 (-0.59%)
Volume$63.4K
CapitalizationN/A
GLW vs JNPR vs QCOM Comparison Chart
Loading...
GLW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JNPR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QCOM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 27, 2024
Stock price -- (GLW: $47.99JNPR: $37.51QCOM: $158.53)
Brand notoriety: GLW, JNPR and QCOM are all notable
GLW represents the Electronic Components industry, JNPR is part of the Telecommunications Equipment industry, and QCOM is in the Semiconductors industry.
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GLW: 43%, JNPR: 25%, QCOM: 41%
Market capitalization -- GLW: $41.09B, JNPR: $12.02B, QCOM: $176.13B
GLW [@Electronic Components] is valued at $41.09B. JNPR’s [@Telecommunications Equipment] market capitalization is $12.02B. QCOM [@Semiconductors] has a market capitalization of $176.13B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Components] industry ranges from $86.27B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Telecommunications Equipment] industry ranges from $202.5B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Semiconductors] industry ranges from $3.43T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Components] industry is $5.96B. The average market capitalization across the [@Telecommunications Equipment] industry is $5.04B. The average market capitalization across the [@Telecommunications Equipment] industry is $53.48B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GLW’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileJNPR’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s), and QCOM’s FA Score reflects 3 green FA rating(s).

  • GLW’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • JNPR’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • QCOM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, JNPR is a better buy in the long-term than QCOM, which in turn is a better option than GLW.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GLW’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while JNPR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and QCOM’s TA Score reflects 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GLW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • JNPR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • QCOM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, JNPR is a better buy in the short-term than GLW, which in turn is a better option than QCOM.

Price Growth

GLW (@Electronic Components) experienced а +1.98% price change this week, while JNPR (@Telecommunications Equipment) price change was +1.38% , and QCOM (@Semiconductors) price fluctuated +5.41% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was +4.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.42%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Telecommunications Equipment industry was +6.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +38.52%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +8.90%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +25.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.08%.

Reported Earning Dates

GLW is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2025.

JNPR is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2025.

QCOM is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Components (+4.32% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

@Telecommunications Equipment (+6.61% weekly)

The Telecommunications Equipment industry produces voice and data communications equipment, which includes fiber optic delivery products, digital signal processors, high-speed voice, data and video delivery. Additionally, satellite systems, global positioning systems, wireless data systems, personal communications equipment, telephone handsets and payload equipment for satellites also fall into this category. Apple Inc., QUALCOMM Incorporated and Nokia are major global players in this segment.

@Semiconductors (+8.90% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QCOM($176B) has a higher market cap than GLW($41.1B) and JNPR($12B). GLW has higher P/E ratio than JNPR and QCOM: GLW (252.58) vs JNPR (39.00) and QCOM (17.73). GLW YTD gains are higher at: 62.233 vs. JNPR (30.323) and QCOM (11.772). QCOM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 12.7B vs. GLW (2.04B) and JNPR (624M). QCOM has more cash in the bank: 13.3B vs. GLW (1.61B) and JNPR (1.21B). JNPR has less debt than GLW and QCOM: JNPR (1.7B) vs GLW (8.34B) and QCOM (14.6B). QCOM has higher revenues than GLW and JNPR: QCOM (39B) vs GLW (12.6B) and JNPR (5.56B).
GLWJNPRQCOM
Capitalization41.1B12B176B
EBITDA2.04B624M12.7B
Gain YTD62.23330.32311.772
P/E Ratio252.5839.0017.73
Revenue12.6B5.56B39B
Total Cash1.61B1.21B13.3B
Total Debt8.34B1.7B14.6B
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GLW vs JNPR vs QCOM: Fundamental Ratings
GLW
JNPR
QCOM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
781411
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
16
Undervalued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
202029
SMR RATING
1..100
888223
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
424756
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
21883
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
501550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

JNPR's Valuation (16) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as QCOM (19) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for GLW (70) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that JNPR's stock grew similarly to QCOM’s and somewhat faster than GLW’s over the last 12 months.

JNPR's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as GLW (20) in the Electronic Components industry, and is in the same range as QCOM (29) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that JNPR's stock grew similarly to GLW’s and similarly to QCOM’s over the last 12 months.

QCOM's SMR Rating (23) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JNPR (82) in the Computer Communications industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for GLW (88) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that QCOM's stock grew somewhat faster than JNPR’s and somewhat faster than GLW’s over the last 12 months.

GLW's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as JNPR (47) in the Computer Communications industry, and is in the same range as QCOM (56) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that GLW's stock grew similarly to JNPR’s and similarly to QCOM’s over the last 12 months.

GLW's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as JNPR (18) in the Computer Communications industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for QCOM (83) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that GLW's stock grew similarly to JNPR’s and significantly faster than QCOM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GLWJNPRQCOM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GLW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JNPR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QCOM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AZTA51.571.32
+2.63%
Azenta
BPRN35.040.29
+0.83%
Princeton Bancorp
LH231.061.57
+0.68%
Laboratory Corp
METC10.240.06
+0.59%
Ramaco Resources
CING4.82-0.04
-0.82%
Cingulate Inc

GLW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLW has been loosely correlated with TEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GLW jumps, then TEL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLW
1D Price
Change %
GLW100%
+0.19%
TEL - GLW
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.55%
SANM - GLW
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.62%
LFUS - GLW
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.79%
OLED - GLW
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.71%
KN - GLW
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.36%
More

JNPR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JNPR has been loosely correlated with HPE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if JNPR jumps, then HPE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JNPR
1D Price
Change %
JNPR100%
+0.03%
HPE - JNPR
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.64%
PI - JNPR
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.66%
KVHI - JNPR
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.94%
BDC - JNPR
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.77%
CIEN - JNPR
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.58%
More

QCOM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QCOM has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QCOM jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QCOM
1D Price
Change %
QCOM100%
-0.52%
LRCX - QCOM
76%
Closely correlated
+0.22%
KLAC - QCOM
75%
Closely correlated
-0.30%
AMAT - QCOM
74%
Closely correlated
-0.49%
NXPI - QCOM
73%
Closely correlated
-0.17%
AMKR - QCOM
71%
Closely correlated
-0.26%
More