Advertisement
GLW vs QCOM
Notable companies
Industry description
Market Cap
High and low price notable news
Volume
Fundamental Analysis Ratings
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Notable companies
Market Cap
High and low price notable news
Volume
Fundamental Analysis Ratings
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLW is a Hold and QCOM is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
QCOM’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileGLW’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- QCOM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- GLW’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GLW’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QCOM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GLW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- QCOM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
GLW (@Electronic Components) experienced а -3.17% price change this week, while QCOM (@Semiconductors) price change was -6.14% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was -4.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.26%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was -4.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -11.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +32.57%.
Reported Earning Dates
GLW is expected to report earnings on Feb 03, 2026.
QCOM is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electronic Components (-4.63% weekly)The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.
@Semiconductors (-4.16% weekly)The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.
| GLW | QCOM | GLW / QCOM | |
| Capitalization | 68.1B | 175B | 39% |
| EBITDA | 3.46B | 14.6B | 24% |
| Gain YTD | 70.392 | 8.128 | 866% |
| P/E Ratio | 50.94 | 32.59 | 156% |
| Revenue | 14.9B | 43.3B | 34% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 10B | - |
| Total Debt | 9.19B | 14.8B | 62% |
QCOM | GLW | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 75 | 82 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 13 Undervalued | 20 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 65 | 8 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 21 | 61 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 8 | 99 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
QCOM's Valuation (13) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as GLW (20) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that QCOM’s stock grew similarly to GLW’s over the last 12 months.
GLW's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QCOM (65) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that GLW’s stock grew somewhat faster than QCOM’s over the last 12 months.
QCOM's SMR Rating (21) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GLW (61) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that QCOM’s stock grew somewhat faster than GLW’s over the last 12 months.
GLW's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as QCOM (54) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that GLW’s stock grew similarly to QCOM’s over the last 12 months.
QCOM's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is significantly better than the same rating for GLW (99) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that QCOM’s stock grew significantly faster than GLW’s over the last 12 months.
| GLW | QCOM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 67% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 63% | 11 days ago 62% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 58% | 5 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | N/A |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ADPV | 39.68 | 0.60 | +1.54% |
| Adaptiv™ Select ETF | |||
| TIER | 27.00 | 0.25 | +0.92% |
| T. Rowe Price International Equity Research ETF | |||
| ONEQ | 87.74 | 0.80 | +0.92% |
| Fidelity Nasdaq Composite ETF | |||
| PMAY | 38.86 | 0.15 | +0.39% |
| Innovator U.S. Equity Power BffrETF™-May | |||
| ADIV | 18.13 | 0.01 | +0.03% |
| SmartETFs Asia Pcfc Dvdnd Bldr ETF | |||
GLW and Stocks
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLW has been closely correlated with CLS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GLW jumps, then CLS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GLW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLW | 100% | +1.83% | ||
| CLS - GLW | 70% Closely correlated | -0.79% | ||
| APH - GLW | 67% Closely correlated | +0.95% | ||
| FLEX - GLW | 67% Closely correlated | +1.44% | ||
| TEL - GLW | 64% Loosely correlated | +2.41% | ||
| TTMI - GLW | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.58% | ||
More | ||||
QCOM and Stocks
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QCOM has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QCOM jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QCOM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QCOM | 100% | +2.32% | ||
| LRCX - QCOM | 80% Closely correlated | +2.19% | ||
| KLAC - QCOM | 78% Closely correlated | -0.48% | ||
| ADI - QCOM | 76% Closely correlated | +3.16% | ||
| NXPI - QCOM | 76% Closely correlated | +3.89% | ||
| AMKR - QCOM | 76% Closely correlated | +6.16% | ||
More | ||||