GLW
Price
$53.04
Change
+$0.32 (+0.61%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
45.43B
23 days until earnings call
JNPR
Price
$39.95
Change
+$0.02 (+0.05%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
12.02B
25 days until earnings call
QCOM
Price
$162.21
Change
-$0.11 (-0.07%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
178.11B
24 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GLW or JNPR or QCOM

Header iconGLW vs JNPR vs QCOM Comparison
Open Charts GLW vs JNPR vs QCOMBanner chart's image
Corning
Price$53.04
Change+$0.32 (+0.61%)
Volume$2.07M
Capitalization45.43B
Juniper Networks
Price$39.95
Change+$0.02 (+0.05%)
Volume$9.45M
Capitalization12.02B
QUALCOMM
Price$162.21
Change-$0.11 (-0.07%)
Volume$4.28M
Capitalization178.11B
GLW vs JNPR vs QCOM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GLW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JNPR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QCOM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (GLW: $53.04JNPR: $39.95QCOM: $162.21)
Brand notoriety: GLW, JNPR and QCOM are all notable
GLW represents the Electronic Components industry, JNPR is part of the Telecommunications Equipment industry, and QCOM is in the Semiconductors industry.
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GLW: 44%, JNPR: 285%, QCOM: 50%
Market capitalization -- GLW: $45.43B, JNPR: $12.02B, QCOM: $178.11B
GLW [@Electronic Components] is valued at $45.43B. JNPR’s [@Telecommunications Equipment] market capitalization is $12.02B. QCOM [@Semiconductors] has a market capitalization of $178.11B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Components] industry ranges from $120.31B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Telecommunications Equipment] industry ranges from $202.5B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Semiconductors] industry ranges from $3.89T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Components] industry is $6.6B. The average market capitalization across the [@Telecommunications Equipment] industry is $5.44B. The average market capitalization across the [@Telecommunications Equipment] industry is $59.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GLW’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileJNPR’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s), and QCOM’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GLW’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • JNPR’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • QCOM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, GLW and QCOM are a better buy in the long-term than JNPR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GLW’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while JNPR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and QCOM’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GLW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • JNPR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • QCOM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GLW and JNPR are a better buy in the short-term than QCOM.

Price Growth

GLW (@Electronic Components) experienced а +2.59% price change this week, while JNPR (@Telecommunications Equipment) price change was +8.27% , and QCOM (@Semiconductors) price fluctuated +2.54% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was +1.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.68%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Telecommunications Equipment industry was +4.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.64%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +3.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.32%.

Reported Earning Dates

GLW is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

JNPR is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

QCOM is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Components (+1.58% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

@Telecommunications Equipment (+4.93% weekly)

The Telecommunications Equipment industry produces voice and data communications equipment, which includes fiber optic delivery products, digital signal processors, high-speed voice, data and video delivery. Additionally, satellite systems, global positioning systems, wireless data systems, personal communications equipment, telephone handsets and payload equipment for satellites also fall into this category. Apple Inc., QUALCOMM Incorporated and Nokia are major global players in this segment.

@Semiconductors (+3.56% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QCOM($178B) has a higher market cap than GLW($45.4B) and JNPR($12B). GLW has higher P/E ratio than JNPR and QCOM: GLW (102.00) vs JNPR (39.00) and QCOM (16.55). GLW YTD gains are higher at: 12.890 vs. JNPR (7.989) and QCOM (6.799). QCOM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 14B vs. GLW (2.42B) and JNPR (624M). QCOM has more cash in the bank: 13.8B vs. GLW (1.36B) and JNPR (1.21B). JNPR has less debt than GLW and QCOM: JNPR (1.7B) vs GLW (8.15B) and QCOM (14.6B). QCOM has higher revenues than GLW and JNPR: QCOM (42.3B) vs GLW (13.6B) and JNPR (5.56B).
GLWJNPRQCOM
Capitalization45.4B12B178B
EBITDA2.42B624M14B
Gain YTD12.8907.9896.799
P/E Ratio102.0039.0016.55
Revenue13.6B5.56B42.3B
Total Cash1.36B1.21B13.8B
Total Debt8.15B1.7B14.6B
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GLW vs JNPR vs QCOM: Fundamental Ratings
GLW
JNPR
QCOM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
324550
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
46
Fair valued
17
Undervalued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
202448
SMR RATING
1..100
847722
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
152549
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
108592
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4150n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

JNPR's Valuation (17) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as QCOM (19) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry, and is in the same range as GLW (46) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that JNPR's stock grew similarly to QCOM’s and similarly to GLW’s over the last 12 months.

GLW's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as JNPR (24) in the Computer Communications industry, and is in the same range as QCOM (48) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that GLW's stock grew similarly to JNPR’s and similarly to QCOM’s over the last 12 months.

QCOM's SMR Rating (22) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JNPR (77) in the Computer Communications industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for GLW (84) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that QCOM's stock grew somewhat faster than JNPR’s and somewhat faster than GLW’s over the last 12 months.

GLW's Price Growth Rating (15) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as JNPR (25) in the Computer Communications industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for QCOM (49) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that GLW's stock grew similarly to JNPR’s and somewhat faster than QCOM’s over the last 12 months.

GLW's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Electronic Components industry is significantly better than the same rating for JNPR (85) in the Computer Communications industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for QCOM (92) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that GLW's stock grew significantly faster than JNPR’s and significantly faster than QCOM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GLWJNPRQCOM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GLW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JNPR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QCOM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSME38.480.92
+2.45%
Thrivent Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF
IYR95.800.09
+0.09%
iShares US Real Estate ETF
IIGD24.67N/A
N/A
Invesco Investment Grade Defensive ETF
ABLG30.93N/A
N/A
Abacus FCF International Leaders ETF
PTBD19.72-0.06
-0.30%
Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

QCOM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QCOM has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QCOM jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QCOM
1D Price
Change %
QCOM100%
-0.07%
KLAC - QCOM
80%
Closely correlated
+0.38%
LRCX - QCOM
80%
Closely correlated
-0.02%
NXPI - QCOM
78%
Closely correlated
+0.41%
ADI - QCOM
78%
Closely correlated
+0.22%
AMAT - QCOM
78%
Closely correlated
+0.55%
More