Advertisement
MTZ or PWR or STRL
Which Stock Would AI Choose? MasTec (MTZ) vs. Quanta Services (PWR) vs. Sterling Infrastructure (STRL) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- MTZ delivered record Q1 2026 results with 34% revenue growth and raised full-year guidance, driving shares up over 100% YTD amid strong backlog expansion to $20.3B.
- PWR reported robust Q1 growth with $7.9B revenue and a record $48.5B backlog, supporting 83% YTD gains fueled by electric infrastructure demand.
- STRL posted blowout Q1 earnings with 92% revenue surge, leading to explosive stock momentum exceeding 160% YTD, driven by e-infrastructure wins.
- All three stocks benefit from infrastructure tailwinds like renewables, data centers, and grid upgrades, with recent earnings beats lifting sentiment across the sector.
- STRL shows the strongest relative YTD performance, while PWR offers the largest scale with $114B market cap versus MTZ's $34B and STRL's $25B.
- Recent weeks highlight accelerated momentum in infrastructure plays, with analyst upgrades following positive guidance revisions.
Introduction
MasTec (MTZ), Quanta Services (PWR), and Sterling Infrastructure (STRL) are key players in the infrastructure construction sector, focusing on energy, utilities, communications, and civil projects. This comparison analyzes their recent performance amid surging demand for grid modernization, renewables, and data centers. Traders seeking momentum in cyclical industrials and long-term investors eyeing backlog visibility will find insights into relative strengths, growth drivers, and market positioning in the current environment.
MTZ Overview and Recent Performance
MasTec, Inc. (MTZ) is an infrastructure engineering and construction firm specializing in communications, clean energy, power delivery, pipelines, and civil projects across North America. In recent market activity, shares have surged over 100% year-to-date, reflecting strong execution. Q1 2026 results showed record revenue up 34% year-over-year to $3.83B, adjusted EPS of $1.39 beating estimates by 40%, and adjusted EBITDA rising 73%. Backlog hit $20.3B, up significantly, driven by clean energy and communications demand. Management raised 2026 guidance to $17.5B revenue and $8.79 adjusted EPS. Positive sentiment stems from sector tailwinds like renewable power generation and fiber deployment, with analysts lifting price targets post-earnings.
PWR Overview and Recent Performance
Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) provides comprehensive infrastructure solutions for electric power, renewables, pipelines, and communications, operating through over 200 subsidiaries. Recent weeks saw shares advance around 83% year-to-date, buoyed by scale and demand. Q1 2026 revenue reached $7.9B, up 26% year-over-year, with adjusted EPS of $2.68 exceeding forecasts by 31% and adjusted EBITDA at $686M. Backlog expanded to a record $48.5B, highlighting utility and data center projects. Full-year guidance was raised, supported by organic growth and acquisitions. Performance reflects robust investments in transmission, renewables, and large load centers, enhancing investor confidence amid grid upgrade needs.
STRL Overview and Recent Performance
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL) delivers e-infrastructure, transportation, and building solutions, with emphasis on site development for data centers, manufacturing, and highways. Shares have skyrocketed over 160% year-to-date, underscoring explosive growth. Q1 2026 revenue jumped 92% to $825.7M, non-GAAP EPS of $3.59 crushing estimates by 140%, fueled by e-infrastructure demand. Backlog and project wins in data centers propelled results, leading to raised 2026 outlook. Recent momentum ties to AI-driven data center boom and civil infrastructure, with the stock hitting new highs post-earnings and drawing analyst upgrades.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the top 25 AI trading bots from over 351 total bots, selecting those best suited to current market conditions like volatility in infrastructure and tech sectors. These bots trade thousands of tickers with diverse strategies—trend analysis, momentum, corridor take-profit/stop-loss (e.g., TP 3%/SL 2%)—across timeframes from 5min to 60min, achieving annualized returns up to +169%, win rates of 51-88%, and profit factors to 11.7. Highlighted performers include bots on semiconductors (NVDA, AVGO), industrials (FIX), and data centers, with average trade durations of 1-48 days. Tickeron offers hundreds of AI bots for various styles, enabling copy trading with real-time signals and no minimum balance. Explore Trending AI Robots to leverage AI for pattern recognition in stocks like MTZ, PWR, and STRL.
Head-to-Head Comparison
All three firms share exposure to infrastructure megatrends—renewables, grid hardening, and data centers—but differ in scale and focus. PWR leads with diversified electric power solutions and massive $48.5B backlog, offering stability via utility contracts, though higher debt ($6.3B) tempers leverage. MTZ balances communications and clean energy, with $20.3B backlog growth signaling multi-year visibility; its P/E around 74x reflects growth premium versus PWR's 104x. STRL shines in nimble e-infrastructure for data centers, boasting 92% Q1 revenue growth but smaller $2.5B scale and higher volatility. Recent momentum favors STRL (160%+ YTD), followed by MTZ (100%+), over PWR (83%), amid earnings catalysts. Risks include project delays and labor costs; valuations show sensitivity to execution, with STRL at 56x P/E trading growth trade-offs against PWR's maturity.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently favors STRL for its superior trend consistency, explosive recent momentum exceeding 160% YTD, and e-infrastructure catalysts aligned with data center demand. While MTZ and PWR offer robust backlogs and stability, STRL's relative positioning suggests higher near-term upside probability in bullish sector conditions.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MTZ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePWR’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and STRL’s FA Score reflects 3 green FA rating(s).
- MTZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PWR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- STRL’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MTZ’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PWR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and STRL’s TA Score reflects 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MTZ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- PWR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- STRL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
MTZ (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а +4.37% price change this week, while PWR (@Engineering & Construction) price change was -2.05% , and STRL (@Engineering & Construction) price fluctuated -6.63% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -1.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.56%.
Reported Earning Dates
MTZ is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
PWR is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
STRL is expected to report earnings on Aug 10, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Engineering & Construction (-1.00% weekly)Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
| MTZ | PWR | STRL | |
| Capitalization | 31.3B | 103B | 24.7B |
| EBITDA | 1.22B | 2.71B | 590M |
| Gain YTD | 82.293 | 63.054 | 162.796 |
| P/E Ratio | 71.16 | 101.53 | 83.36 |
| Revenue | 15.3B | 30.1B | 2.89B |
| Total Cash | 274M | 365M | 512M |
| Total Debt | 3.02B | 6.32B | 342M |
MTZ | PWR | STRL | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 7 | 55 | 77 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 86 Overvalued | 89 Overvalued | 92 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 14 | 4 | 8 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 59 | 63 | 28 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | 39 | 35 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | 14 | 5 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MTZ's Valuation (86) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as PWR (89) and is in the same range as STRL (92). This means that MTZ's stock grew similarly to PWR’s and similarly to STRL’s over the last 12 months.
PWR's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as STRL (8) and is in the same range as MTZ (14). This means that PWR's stock grew similarly to STRL’s and similarly to MTZ’s over the last 12 months.
STRL's SMR Rating (28) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as MTZ (59) and is somewhat better than the same rating for PWR (63). This means that STRL's stock grew similarly to MTZ’s and somewhat faster than PWR’s over the last 12 months.
STRL's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as MTZ (37) and is in the same range as PWR (39). This means that STRL's stock grew similarly to MTZ’s and similarly to PWR’s over the last 12 months.
STRL's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as PWR (14) and is in the same range as MTZ (36). This means that STRL's stock grew similarly to PWR’s and similarly to MTZ’s over the last 12 months.
| MTZ | PWR | STRL | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 50% | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 68% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 54% | 1 day ago 62% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 67% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 12 days ago 74% | 5 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 70% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 82% |
Advertisement
PWR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PWR has been closely correlated with MTZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PWR jumps, then MTZ could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PWR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PWR | 100% | -4.28% | ||
| MTZ - PWR | 81% Closely correlated | -1.81% | ||
| MYRG - PWR | 79% Closely correlated | -2.15% | ||
| FIX - PWR | 76% Closely correlated | -8.10% | ||
| IESC - PWR | 68% Closely correlated | -6.74% | ||
| EME - PWR | 68% Closely correlated | -7.48% | ||
More | ||||
STRL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STRL has been closely correlated with FIX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if STRL jumps, then FIX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To STRL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| STRL | 100% | -8.75% | ||
| FIX - STRL | 66% Closely correlated | -8.10% | ||
| ECG - STRL | 66% Closely correlated | -5.03% | ||
| IESC - STRL | 65% Loosely correlated | -6.74% | ||
| MTZ - STRL | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.81% | ||
| PWR - STRL | 64% Loosely correlated | -4.28% | ||
More | ||||