Go to the list of all blogs
Allana's Avatar
published in Blogs
Nov 07, 2026
TickeronGET DAILY SIGNALS
AVUV vs DFAT: Weighing Two Active Small-Cap Value ETFs

AVUV vs DFAT: Weighing Two Active Small-Cap Value ETFs

Key Takeaways

  • Both funds are actively managed U.S. value strategies, but AVUV targets small-cap value with a profitability screen, while DFAT spans small- and mid-cap value across a broader capitalization range.
  • AVUV holds roughly 800 stocks with a weighted average market capitalization near $3.5 billion; DFAT holds roughly 1,200–1,300 names with a weighted average market cap closer to $7 billion.
  • AVUV carries a 0.25% expense ratio, slightly below DFAT at 0.28%, giving the Avantis fund a modest cost edge.
  • Both funds lean heavily into financials, energy, and industrials, but AVUV skews more deeply toward energy and consumer cyclicals, while DFAT adds greater mid-cap and health-care breadth.
  • Relative positioning favors AVUV for deeper small-cap value and profitability exposure, while DFAT offers broader diversification and slightly lower concentration risk.
  • Tickeron AI Verdict: AVUV — the Avantis fund combines a lower cost, deeper value-and-profitability tilt, and stronger factor consistency within the current market regime.

Why These Two Funds Stand Out for Value Investors

Value-focused investors evaluating U.S. small-cap equity often encounter two of the category's most prominent active offerings: AVUV and DFAT. Although the funds compete directly for the same investor dollar, they are not identical vehicles. Avantis U.S. Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) pursues a concentrated small-cap value-and-profitability mandate, while Dimensional U.S. Targeted Value ETF (DFAT) applies a broader targeted-value approach that stretches from small caps into mid caps. This ETF comparison clarifies their structural differences, sector exposure, and relative positioning so investors can understand which tool better suits a value-oriented portfolio in today's market environment. When I compared their holdings side by side, I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how the funds align with broader industry peers.

A Closer Look at AVUV

AVUV is an actively managed, rules-based portfolio issued by American Century Investments and launched in September 2019. The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation by investing primarily in U.S. small-cap companies trading at low valuations with higher profitability ratios. Its systematic process weights holdings using combined value and profitability signals rather than tracking a traditional index.

The fund holds roughly 800 securities, keeping single-stock risk low — the top 10 positions account for only about 8.5% of assets. Representative top holdings include MATX (Matson), GATX, FIVE (Five Below), M (Macy's), VSAT (Viasat), and LEA (Lear). Sector allocation is dominated by financials (roughly 28%), followed by consumer cyclical (~19%), energy (~15%), and industrials (~13%), with a smaller information-technology sleeve near 7%. The fund's weighted average market capitalization sits near $3.5 billion, underscoring its authentic small-cap profile, and it charges a 0.25% expense ratio.

Understanding DFAT's Approach

DFAT is an active, tax-managed ETF from Dimensional Fund Advisors, launched in June 2021. It pursues long-term capital appreciation from a portfolio of U.S. small- and mid-cap value stocks, applying Dimensional's well-established research on size, relative price, and profitability. Rather than targeting a single benchmark, the fund maintains flexible exposure across the lower half of the U.S. market-cap spectrum.

With roughly 1,200–1,300 holdings, DFAT is among the most diversified value funds available; its top 10 positions represent only about 6.5%–7% of assets. Top names have included CF (CF Industries), PR (Permian Resources), APA, OVV (Ovintiv), AA (Alcoa), BALL (Ball Corp), and ALLY (Ally Financial). Sector exposure is led by financials (~29%), followed by industrials (~16%), consumer cyclical (~15%), energy (~9%), and information technology (~8%). Its weighted average market cap of roughly $7 billion reflects a meaningfully larger, more mid-cap-tilted portfolio than AVUV, and it charges a 0.28% expense ratio. I also ran a quick scan with Tickeron’s AI Trend Prediction Engine to confirm the relative size differences.

The Market Context for These Value Plays

Both funds operate within the broader U.S. small- and mid-cap value complex, a segment that has historically shown sensitivity to interest-rate expectations, credit conditions, and the economic cycle. Because financials and energy represent the largest combined weights in each portfolio, fund performance is closely tied to the path of interest rates, lending margins, and commodity prices. Recent market cycles have favored value and cyclical sectors during periods of firming inflation expectations and steepening yield curves, while growth leadership tends to pressure relative returns. A modest tilt toward domestically oriented companies also means both funds carry less mega-cap technology exposure than the broader market — a structural feature that lowers valuation risk but can dampen participation in large-cap growth rallies.

How They Stack Up in Recent Markets

In recent weeks and months, both AVUV and DFAT have benefited from a rotation into value and cyclical equities, yet their relative positioning has diverged in subtle ways. AVUV's deeper small-cap and energy emphasis has made it more sensitive to commodity trends and to the re-rating of smaller, lower-valued firms. DFAT's broader capitalization band and larger health-care and staples allocation have generally tempered volatility and provided a smoother ride during risk-off episodes. On a structural basis, AVUV's stronger value and profitability tilts and its marginally lower cost give it a firmer foundation for capturing the size and value premiums, while DFAT's superior diversification reduces single-name and sector concentration risk. Investors should weigh these differences against their tolerance for volatility rather than focusing on short-term price swings.

Enhancing My Research with Tickeron’s AI Screener

I often turn to Tickeron’s AI Screener when comparing ETFs like these because it lets me quickly filter for technical patterns, fundamentals, and AI-driven signals across thousands of securities. The tool helps surface how AVUV and DFAT stack up against peers on metrics such as volatility and performance, which adds useful context to the structural differences outlined above. It streamlines the process without replacing deeper manual review.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Related Ticker: AVUV, DFAT

Contributor

Allana's AvatarAllana|Expert

Financial analyst and market blogger with expertise in equity research, fundamental analysis, and macroeconomic trends. I regularly publish coverage on individual stocks, ETFs, and sector developments — combining rigorous financial analysis with clear, engaging writing for a broad investment audience.


Momentum Indicator for AVUV turns negative, indicating new downward trend

AVUV saw its Momentum Indicator move below the 0 level on November 05, 2026. This is an indication that the stock could be shifting in to a new downward move. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 82 similar instances where the indicator turned negative. In 72 of the 82 cases, the stock moved further down in the following days. The odds of a decline are at 88%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bearish Trend Analysis

The 10-day RSI Indicator for AVUV moved out of overbought territory on October 30, 2026. This could be a bearish sign for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 45 similar instances where the indicator moved out of overbought territory. In 34 of the 45 cases, the stock moved lower in the following days. This puts the odds of a move lower at 76%.

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for AVUV turned negative on November 06, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 49 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 37 of the 49 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 76%.

AVUV moved below its 50-day moving average on November 05, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where AVUV declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 80%.

AVUV broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 29, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.

Bullish Trend Analysis

The Stochastic Oscillator is in the oversold zone. Keep an eye out for a move up in the foreseeable future.

The 10-day moving average for AVUV crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on November 02, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 15 of 17 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 88%.

Following a +0.72% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where AVUV advanced for three days, in 245 of 295 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 83%.

The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 260 of 305 cases where AVUV Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 85%.

Notable companies

The most notable companies in this group are VF Corp (NYSE:VFC), Lincoln National Corp (NYSE:LNC), Gap Inc (The) (NYSE:GAP), Chord Energy Corp (NASDAQ:CHRD), Mosaic Company (The) (NYSE:MOS), Lyft (NASDAQ:LYFT), Abercrombie & Fitch Co (NYSE:ANF), Macy's (NYSE:M), Transocean Ltd (NYSE:RIG), Valaris Limited (NYSE:VAL).

Industry description

The investment seeks long-term capital appreciation. The fund invests primarily in a diverse group of U.S. small cap companies across market sectors and industry groups. Under normal market conditions, it will invest at least 80% of its assets in securities of small capitalization companies located in the United States. The fund also may invest in derivative instruments such as futures contracts, currency forwards, and swap agreements.

Market Cap

The average market capitalization across the Avantis U.S. Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) ETF is 2.12B. The market cap for tickers in the group ranges from 24.4M to 10.7B. PAYC holds the highest valuation in this group at 10.7B. The lowest valued company is CABO at 24.4M.

High and low price notable news

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the Avantis U.S. Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) ETF was -3%. For the same ETF, the average monthly price growth was 0%, and the average quarterly price growth was 1%. CRCT experienced the highest price growth at 44%, while ACDC experienced the biggest fall at -38%.

Volume

The average weekly volume growth across all stocks in the Avantis U.S. Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) ETF was 11%. For the same stocks of the ETF, the average monthly volume growth was 20% and the average quarterly volume growth was -9%

Fundamental Analysis Ratings

The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows

Valuation Rating: 52
P/E Growth Rating: 49
Price Growth Rating: 53
SMR Rating: 60
Profit Risk Rating: 68
Seasonality Score: 12 (-100 ... +100)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
A.I.Advisor
published price charts
A.I. Advisor
published General Information

General Information

Category SmallValue

Category
Small Value
Address
American Century ETF TrustCharles A. Etherington 4500 Main StreetKansas City
Phone
(816) 531-5575
Web
americancenturyetfs.com
Interact to see
Advertisement
The Bitwise Solana Staking ETF (BSOL) advanced roughly 18% over the trailing 30 days, closely tracking a sharp rally in Solana (SOL). The move extends a broader recovery, with BSOL up approximately 77% over the past three months from its mid-2026 trough.
MSTY is an actively managed single-stock option income ETF (exchange-traded fund) that writes call options on Strategy (MSTR), formerly MicroStrategy, to generate current income. The portfolio is anchored by U.S. Treasury bills and MSTR option contracts rather than a diversified basket of equities, concentrating exposure in one volatile underlying.
AMDL has surged roughly +64% over the past 30 days, from about $47.59 to $78.10, mirroring a powerful rally in its sole underlying stock, AMD . The fund is a leveraged single-stock ETF (exchange-traded fund) designed to deliver 2x the daily return of AMD, amplifying both gains and losses.
Analysts expect Q1 2026 revenue of $1.54 billion, reflecting approximately 74% year-over-year growth. Consensus earnings per share (EPS) forecast stands at $0.28, up over 115% from the prior year.
Analysts expect Q1 2026 revenue of $3.00 billion, up 8% from $2.77 billion in the year-ago quarter. Consensus earnings per share (EPS) estimate stands at $4.31, reflecting steady profitability from the cystic fibrosis (CF) portfolio.