Go to the list of all blogs
Sergey Savastiouk's Avatar
published in Blogs
Sep 25, 2020
Costco (COST, $338.70) beats Q4 earnings estimates; but COVID-19 expenses climb

Costco (COST, $338.70) beats Q4 earnings estimates; but COVID-19 expenses climb

Costco Wholesale Corp.  fiscal fourth quarter earnings beat analysts’ expectations. However,  rising coronavirus expenses, including wage increases, had an impact on the results.

The retail company’s  said earnings for the three months ending in August, came in at $3.04 per share, well above analysts’ forecast of $2.85 per share. It was also +13% higher year-over-year.

Revenues climbed +12.5% year-over-year to $52.3 billion in the quarter. Same-store sales rose by +11.4% -- the most in two decades .

However, pandemic-related expenses increased, topping $280 million for the quarter, higher than $100 million forecast. The costs included a $2 per hour premium paid to employees, which equates to around $14 million per week, according to the company.

According to Tickeron, COST is in upward trend: price rose above 50-day moving average on September 21, 2020

COST moved above its 50-day Moving Average on September 21, 2020 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend. In 31 of 44 similar past instances, the stock price increased further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 70%.

Current price $338.70 crossed the resistance line at $340.91 and is trading between $340.91 resistance and $327.60 support lines. Throughout the month of 08/24/20 - 09/24/20, the price experienced a +0.83% Uptrend. During the week of 09/17/20 - 09/24/20, the stock enjoyed a +2% Uptrend growth.

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bullish Trend Analysis

The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on September 24, 2020. You may want to consider a long position or call options on COST as a result. In 55 of 99 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 56%.

Following a +0.74% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where COST advanced for three days, in 227 of 394 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 58%.

The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 187 of 336 cases where COST Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 56%.

Bearish Trend Analysis

The 10-day RSI Indicator for COST moved out of overbought territory on September 03, 2020. This could be a bearish sign for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 46 similar instances where the indicator moved out of overbought territory. In 15 of the 46 cases, the stock moved lower in the following days. This puts the odds of a move lower at 33%.

The Stochastic Indicator entered the overbought zone. Expect a price pull-back in the foreseeable future.

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for COST turned negative on September 04, 2020. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 43 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 16 of the 43 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 37%.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where Apple declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 34%.

COST broke above its upper Bollinger Band on September 02, 2020. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.

Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)

Tickeron has a negative outlook on this ticker and predicts a further decline by more than 4.00% within the next month with a likelihood of 45%. During the last month, the daily ratio of advancing to declining volumes was 1.11 to 1.

The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 2 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating low risk on high returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 77, placing this stock better than average.

The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 42 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to consistent earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 42 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. COST’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 54 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly weaker than average sales and a marginally profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.

The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 93 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (9.12) is normal, around the industry mean (5.78). P/E Ratio (41.49) is within average values for comparable stocks, (54.60). COST's Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (14.98) is very high in comparison to the industry average of (1.21). Dividend Yield (0.83) settles around the average of (1.03) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.84) is also within normal values, averaging (0.88).

Related Ticker: COST

COST in downward trend: 10-day moving average moved below 50-day moving average on June 03, 2026

The 10-day moving average for COST crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on June 03, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In of 19 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on June 18, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on COST as a result. In of 72 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where COST declined for three days, the price rose further in of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .

The Aroon Indicator for COST entered a downward trend on July 08, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.

Bullish Trend Analysis

The RSI Oscillator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where COST's RSI Indicator exited the oversold zone, of 25 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are .

The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. of 51 cases where COST's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are .

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for COST just turned positive on July 07, 2026. Looking at past instances where COST's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in of 46 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .

Following a 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where COST advanced for three days, in of 368 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .

Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)

The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating low risk on high returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 63, placing this stock better than average.

The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.

The Tickeron Seasonality Score of (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.

The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. COST’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Valuation Rating of (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (12.610) is normal, around the industry mean (7.470). P/E Ratio (47.944) is within average values for comparable stocks, (37.468). COST's Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (4.648) is slightly higher than the industry average of (2.781). Dividend Yield (0.006) settles around the average of (0.015) among similar stocks. COST's P/S Ratio (1.443) is slightly higher than the industry average of (1.006).

Notable companies

The most notable companies in this group are Walmart (NASDAQ:WMT), Costco Wholesale Corp (NASDAQ:COST), Target Corp (NYSE:TGT), Dollar General Corp (NYSE:DG), Dollar Tree (NASDAQ:DLTR).

Industry description

Companies in the discount stores industry specialize in offering substantial discounts on a vast array of retail products. Some companies in this industry also operate general merchandise warehouse clubs. Products sold at discount stores are typically similar to those of any department store, but the pricing of the goods is generally much lower (and hence the name “discount”). Think Dollar General Corporation, Dollar Tree, Inc. and Five Below, Inc. Many discount stores target low-income households and/or price-sensitive consumers as their potential market. Discount stores’ profitability could hinge on factors like competitive pricing, sufficient locations, healthy revenue per square foot, and effective advertisement. These store operators could have an edge over other retailers during financial crises or recessions, when many consumers could be looking for less expensive alternatives.

Market Cap

The average market capitalization across the Discount Stores Industry is 160.57B. The market cap for tickers in the group ranges from 1.78K to 887.64B. WMT holds the highest valuation in this group at 887.64B. The lowest valued company is TUEMQ at 1.78K.

High and low price notable news

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the Discount Stores Industry was -1%. For the same Industry, the average monthly price growth was 1%, and the average quarterly price growth was 2%. WMT experienced the highest price growth at 2%, while OLLI experienced the biggest fall at -10%.

Volume

The average weekly volume growth across all stocks in the Discount Stores Industry was -29%. For the same stocks of the Industry, the average monthly volume growth was -25% and the average quarterly volume growth was -36%

Fundamental Analysis Ratings

The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows

Valuation Rating: 77
P/E Growth Rating: 60
Price Growth Rating: 53
SMR Rating: 49
Profit Risk Rating: 62
Seasonality Score: -1 (-100 ... +100)
View a ticker or compare two or three
COST
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
A.I.Advisor
published price charts
Last 5 trading days
A.I. Advisor
published General Information

General Information

a company which sells goods through membership warehouses

Industry DiscountStores

Profile
Details
Industry
Specialty Stores
Address
999 Lake Drive
Phone
+1 425 313-8100
Employees
341000
Web
https://www.costco.com
Interact to see
Advertisement
Aon plc (AON) reported third-quarter 2025 revenue of $3.997 billion, representing a 7% year-over-year increase with equal organic growth. Adjusted earnings per share came in at $3.05, exceeding expectations. In late November, Moody’s reaffirmed Aon’s Baa2 credit rating and revised the outlook to positive, citing reduced leverage following the NFP acquisition.
Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (APD) entered the spotlight after announcing advanced discussions with Yara International on December 8 to collaborate on low-emission ammonia projects. While the strategic direction aligns with global decarbonization trends, uncertainty around execution and capital requirements triggered a 9.45% one-day decline in the stock.
Lockheed Martin and RTX Corporation are two of the most prominent names in the aerospace and defense industry, both positioned to benefit from heightened global security concerns and sustained U.S. military spending.
As 2025 winds down, the Savings Banks sector reflects a mix of stability, innovation, and AI-driven disruption. Among the most closely watched tickers—SOFI Technologies (SOFI), Ally Financial (ALLY), and PayPal Holdings (PYPL)—investors have witnessed contrasting stories of growth, valuation, and market perception.
Ondas Holdings (ONDS) is a wireless technology company focused on delivering secure, long-range communications for industrial Internet of Things (IoT) and data networking applications. Its solutions are built to support mission-critical operations across sectors such as rail, energy, maritime, infrastructure, and industrial automation.
Ciena’s growth is driven by expanding offerings in optical networking, network automation software, and 5G transport infrastructure, complemented by services designed to help customers modernize and future-proof their networks. Its evolving technology portfolio addresses the rising complexity, speed, and reliability requirements of today’s communications environment.
Marathon Digital Holdings (MARA) and Riot Platforms (RIOT) are two leading companies in the Bitcoin mining industry, each operating energy-intensive infrastructure to capitalize on cryptocurrency market cycles. This comparison is especially relevant amid ongoing Bitcoin price volatility and growing interest in digital assets and AI-related infrastructure.
Roivant Sciences has delivered strong year-to-date performance, with shares up roughly 82%, driven by encouraging pipeline developments and increased investment in high-potential subsidiaries such as Immunovant.
MP Materials Corp. (MP) and USA Rare Earth, Inc. (USAR) are central to the United States’ push to establish a secure, domestic supply of rare earth elements—materials critical to electric vehicles, renewable energy, and defense technologies. As geopolitical tensions and supply chain vulnerabilities intensify, these two companies offer distinct approaches to addressing U.S. dependence on foreign sources.
The Invesco QQQ Trust (NASDAQ: QQQ) remains one of the most closely followed ETFs worldwide, offering investors direct exposure to the NASDAQ-100 Index®. In the most recent data, QQQ has gained a notable +20.16% year-to-date, even as markets experienced bouts of elevated volatility.
Sidus Space has expanded its portfolio in 2025, focusing on satellite missions and supporting technologies to enhance space infrastructure. Key product advancements include the LizzieSat platforms, with multiple units progressing in design and manufacturing. LizzieSat-3 is set for launch no earlier than Q1 2025, building on prior missions to boost data capabilities for clients in Earth observation and communication.
As 2025 comes to a close, Dingdong (Cayman) Limited (DDL) continues to strengthen its position in China’s competitive fresh grocery e-commerce market. Operating from Shanghai, the company focuses on high-quality fresh produce, ready-to-eat meals, and daily essentials delivered directly to consumers. Throughout the year, Dingdong emphasized private-label expansion, supply-chain optimization, and fulfillment network growth—initiatives that supported improving quarterly performance and positioned the company for sustained momentum.
Pioneer Power's 2025 highlights include the expansion of its mobile power and charging footprint with new orders and partnerships; the launch of a new suite of e-Boost solutions for off-grid EV charging; the rebranding of HomeBoost as PowerCore with events in December; the introduction of PRYMUS in December; and a new five-year contract for network transformers with a regional utility provider.
An AI-driven comparison between Palantir (PLTR) and Oracle (ORCL) points to Palantir as the more compelling investment heading into 2026. The analysis highlights PLTR’s AI-native platforms, which enable real-time, data-driven decision-making across fast-growing sectors such as government, defense, and enterprise analytics.
An AI-driven comparison between D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) and IonQ (IONQ) points to IonQ as the stronger opportunity heading into 2026. The analysis highlights IONQ’s gate-based, trapped-ion quantum architecture, which supports a wide range of algorithms and positions the company for broader adoption across AI, simulation, and cryptography.
An AI-driven comparison of Rigetti Computing (RGTI) and D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) points to Rigetti as the more compelling opportunity heading into 2026. The analysis highlights RGTI’s gate-based quantum architecture, which supports universal quantum computing and a wide range of complex algorithms. While D-Wave remains a leader in quantum annealing for optimization problems, Rigetti’s full-stack, gate-based approach offers greater scalability and broader long-term applications.
An AI-driven comparison of Rigetti Computing (RGTI) and TeraWulf (WULF) points to TeraWulf as the more attractive investment heading into 2026. The analysis emphasizes WULF’s large-scale digital infrastructure supporting Bitcoin mining and high-performance computing (HPC), which generates immediate revenue in expanding digital asset and AI-driven markets.
An AI-driven comparison between Rocket Lab USA (RKLB) and Planet Labs (PL) identifies Rocket Lab as the more compelling investment heading into 2026. The analysis highlights RKLB’s vertically integrated space services and consistent launch performance, which position the company to benefit from rising demand for satellite deployment and space infrastructure.
An AI-driven comparison of Tempus AI (TEM) and Doximity (DOCS) points to Tempus AI as the more compelling investment opportunity heading into 2026. The analysis highlights TEM’s AI-powered precision medicine platform, which applies advanced analytics and genomic data to transform diagnostics and treatment in oncology and cardiology.
Costco (COST, $338.70) beats Q4 earnings estimates; but COVID-19 expenses climb