FSTA vs RSPS: Weighing Cost Efficiency Against Equal-Weight Diversification in Consumer Staples

Key Takeaways

• FSTA is a market-cap-weighted, low-cost (0.08% expense ratio) fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Consumer Staples 25/50 Index, holding roughly 97–104 stocks.
• RSPS equally weights about 37–39 S&P 500 consumer staples names at a 0.40% expense ratio, reducing mega-cap concentration but raising fees and single-line volatility.
• The two funds compete directly for U.S. consumer staples exposure but differ sharply in concentration, cost, and diversification profile.
• FSTA is top-heavy in giants such as Walmart and Costco, while RSPS spreads risk across mid-tier names including Target, Bunge, and Archer-Daniels-Midland.
• Tickeron AI Verdict: FSTA is the favored ticker, reflecting its lower cost, broader diversification, deeper liquidity, and more consistent long-term positioning.

Introduction

Both FSTA and RSPS give investors a way into the U.S. consumer staples sector, a defensive area that tends to hold up better when growth slows. They aim for the same goal but follow different rules. FSTA follows a broad capitalization-weighted index, while RSPS uses equal weighting on a smaller group of S&P 500 staples names. These differences create a useful case study on how sector exposure, costs, and diversification can shape results in today’s market.

Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA) Overview

FSTA tracks the MSCI USA IMI Consumer Staples 25/50 Index and has been around since October 2013. It holds about 97–104 stocks with a very low 0.08% expense ratio. Because it is cap-weighted, the biggest positions sit in names like WMT, COST, PG, and KO, which together make up a large portion of the fund, followed by PEP, PM, and MO. The top ten holdings usually exceed 60% of assets, giving it a clear large-cap focus. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how the stock compares to others in the industry.

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS) Overview

RSPS follows the S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples Index and launched in November 2006. It holds roughly 37–39 stocks, each weighted close to 3%, with a 0.40% expense ratio. Leading holdings include MNST, TGT, BG, ADM, KDP, and DG. The equal-weight approach reduces the pull of the largest companies and increases exposure to smaller, more variable businesses. Periodic rebalancing adds turnover compared with cap-weighted funds.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Consumer staples have long served as a defensive holding when economic growth slows. Right now the sector faces both opportunities and pressures. Rising costs in food, packaging, and transport have squeezed margins for many packaged goods firms, while strong brands and premium offerings have helped others. Shifts in consumer habits, private-label competition, and the rise of discount and club stores have changed the playing field. Interest-rate moves also matter because staples tend to act as a buffer when growth stocks pull back. These forces affect both funds, though their different weightings mean they feel the impact in distinct ways.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

Over recent cycles FSTA has delivered stronger cumulative returns, helped by the scale and steady earnings of its largest holdings. RSPS has shown more swings because its equal-weight structure tilts toward mid-tier retailers, agricultural firms, and smaller beverage names whose results can move differently from sector leaders. In recent months defensive qualities have supported both during market swings, yet FSTA’s moderate beta and historically milder drawdowns stand out. The fee gap remains important: the 0.08% expense ratio at FSTA versus 0.40% at RSPS creates a lasting difference in net returns. FSTA’s larger size and trading volume also mean tighter spreads and easier execution.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on the structural details, Tickeron’s AI currently favors FSTA over RSPS. The lower expense ratio, wider diversification across 97–104 holdings, stronger liquidity, and better cost efficiency over time give it the edge. While RSPS lowers mega-cap concentration, its smaller portfolio and higher fees have tended to limit relative performance. For investors looking for steady, cost-effective staples exposure, FSTA’s profile looks more attractive in this matchup.

Exploring Tools for Further Analysis

When comparing ETFs like these, I often use Tickeron’s AI Screener to quickly scan technical patterns, fundamentals, and performance metrics across the sector. It helps surface ideas and confirm how different funds align with a given strategy without manual effort. Explore the AI Screener to streamline research and spot opportunities that fit your approach.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Notable companies

Industry description

Market Cap

High and low price notable news

Volume