Go to the list of all blogs
Sergey Savastiouk's Avatar
published in Blogs
Jul 09, 2020
SAP (SAP, $152.27) preliminary results beat expectations

SAP (SAP, $152.27) preliminary results beat expectations

SAP's preliminary report revealed Q2 results that were higher than analysts’ expectations.

In the preliminary report (that comes ahead of a full Q2 report due on July 27),  SAP states that the software company’s  Q2 revenue rose +2% annually on a non-IFRS basis to €6.74 billion($7.62 billion).  That is above  FactSet consensus estimate of €6.69 billion ($7.56 billion)

However, the figure is slower than Q1’s 7% growth.

On the other hand, SAP’s competitor Oracle   experienced a -6%  drop in revenue during its May quarter, and provided guidance (during its June 16 earnings call) for August quarter revenue growth  in the range of  -1% to up +1%, with a 1% currency headwind.

[ORCL & SAP] are closely correlated.

Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry

Market capitalization -- SAP: $175.4B vs. ORCL: $173.9B

Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SAP: 56% vs. ORCL: 94%

Long term analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SAP’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green while ORCL’s FA Score has 2’s green FA rating(s).

  • SAP’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • ORCL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators.

SAP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA rating(s) are bullish while ORCL’s TA Score has 6’s bullish TA rating(s).

  • SAP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • ORCL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 1 bearish.

SAP vs ORCL: Fundamental Ratings:

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ORCL's Valuation (8) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as SAP (10). This means that ORCL’s stock grew similarly to SAP’s over the last 12 months.

SAP's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as ORCL (44). This means that SAP’s stock grew similarly to ORCL’s over the last 12 months.

ORCL's SMR Rating (9) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as SAP (32). This means that ORCL’s stock grew similarly to SAP’s over the last 12 months.

SAP's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as ORCL (47). This means that SAP’s stock grew similarly to ORCL’s over the last 12 months.

SAP's P/E Growth Rating (40) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as ORCL (55). This means that SAP’s stock grew similarly to ORCL’s over the last 12 months.

SAP ($175B) and ORCL ($174B) have the same market capitalization. SAP has higher P/E ratio than ORCL: 11.276 vs 7.932. SAP YTD gains are higher at: 11.276 vs. ORCL (7.932). ORCL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 17.2B vs. SAP (8.911B). ORCL has more cash in the bank: 37.2B vs. SAP (8.576B). SAP has less debt than ORCL: 19.4B vs 73.7B. ORCL has higher revenues than SAP: 39.1B vs 31.1B.

 

Related Ticker: SAP

Momentum Indicator for SAP turns positive, indicating new upward trend

SAP saw its Momentum Indicator move above the 0 level on July 02, 2026. This is an indication that the stock could be shifting in to a new upward move. Traders may want to consider buying the stock or buying call options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 88 similar instances where the indicator turned positive. In of the 88 cases, the stock moved higher in the following days. The odds of a move higher are at .

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bullish Trend Analysis

The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where SAP's RSI Indicator exited the oversold zone, of 34 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are .

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for SAP just turned positive on July 02, 2026. Looking at past instances where SAP's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in of 48 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .

Following a 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where SAP advanced for three days, in of 320 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Stochastic Oscillator has been in the overbought zone for 2 days. Expect a price pull-back in the near future.

SAP moved below its 50-day moving average on June 10, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.

The 10-day moving average for SAP crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on June 17, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In of 12 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where SAP declined for three days, the price rose further in of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .

The Aroon Indicator for SAP entered a downward trend on July 07, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.

Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)

The Tickeron Valuation Rating of (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is seriously undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (3.622) is normal, around the industry mean (30.094). P/E Ratio (22.299) is within average values for comparable stocks, (77.124). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.387) is also within normal values, averaging (1.490). Dividend Yield (0.019) settles around the average of (0.049) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (4.371) is also within normal values, averaging (52.327).

The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.

The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. SAP’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. SAP’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 95, placing this stock better than average.

The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.

Notable companies

The most notable companies in this group are Shopify Inc (NASDAQ:SHOP), Uber Technologies (NYSE:UBER), Salesforce (NYSE:CRM), ServiceNow Inc. (NYSE:NOW), Datadog (NASDAQ:DDOG), Adobe (NASDAQ:ADBE), Intuit (NASDAQ:INTU), Autodesk (NASDAQ:ADSK), Workday (NASDAQ:WDAY), Zoom Communications Inc (NASDAQ:ZM).

Industry description

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

Market Cap

The average market capitalization across the Packaged Software Industry is 8.99B. The market cap for tickers in the group ranges from 291 to 195.82B. SAPGF holds the highest valuation in this group at 195.82B. The lowest valued company is BLGI at 291.

High and low price notable news

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the Packaged Software Industry was -1%. For the same Industry, the average monthly price growth was 2%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11%. ALIT experienced the highest price growth at 29%, while NTCL experienced the biggest fall at -98%.

Volume

The average weekly volume growth across all stocks in the Packaged Software Industry was -22%. For the same stocks of the Industry, the average monthly volume growth was -32% and the average quarterly volume growth was -2%

Fundamental Analysis Ratings

The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows

Valuation Rating: 52
P/E Growth Rating: 79
Price Growth Rating: 60
SMR Rating: 78
Profit Risk Rating: 95
Seasonality Score: 2 (-100 ... +100)
Related Portfolios: APPLICATION SOFTWARE
View a ticker or compare two or three
SAP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
A.I.Advisor
published price charts
Last 5 trading days
A.I. Advisor
published General Information

General Information

a provider of e-business software solutions

Industry PackagedSoftware

Profile
Details
Industry
Packaged Software
Address
Dietmar-Hopp-Allee 16
Phone
+49 6227747474
Employees
107602
Web
https://www.sap.com
Interact to see
Advertisement
Lockheed Martin and RTX Corporation are two of the most prominent names in the aerospace and defense industry, both positioned to benefit from heightened global security concerns and sustained U.S. military spending.
As 2025 winds down, the Savings Banks sector reflects a mix of stability, innovation, and AI-driven disruption. Among the most closely watched tickers—SOFI Technologies (SOFI), Ally Financial (ALLY), and PayPal Holdings (PYPL)—investors have witnessed contrasting stories of growth, valuation, and market perception.
Ondas Holdings (ONDS) is a wireless technology company focused on delivering secure, long-range communications for industrial Internet of Things (IoT) and data networking applications. Its solutions are built to support mission-critical operations across sectors such as rail, energy, maritime, infrastructure, and industrial automation.
Ciena’s growth is driven by expanding offerings in optical networking, network automation software, and 5G transport infrastructure, complemented by services designed to help customers modernize and future-proof their networks. Its evolving technology portfolio addresses the rising complexity, speed, and reliability requirements of today’s communications environment.
Roivant Sciences has delivered strong year-to-date performance, with shares up roughly 82%, driven by encouraging pipeline developments and increased investment in high-potential subsidiaries such as Immunovant.
MP Materials Corp. (MP) and USA Rare Earth, Inc. (USAR) are central to the United States’ push to establish a secure, domestic supply of rare earth elements—materials critical to electric vehicles, renewable energy, and defense technologies. As geopolitical tensions and supply chain vulnerabilities intensify, these two companies offer distinct approaches to addressing U.S. dependence on foreign sources.
Pioneer Power's 2025 highlights include the expansion of its mobile power and charging footprint with new orders and partnerships; the launch of a new suite of e-Boost solutions for off-grid EV charging; the rebranding of HomeBoost as PowerCore with events in December; the introduction of PRYMUS in December; and a new five-year contract for network transformers with a regional utility provider.
An AI-driven comparison between Palantir (PLTR) and Oracle (ORCL) points to Palantir as the more compelling investment heading into 2026. The analysis highlights PLTR’s AI-native platforms, which enable real-time, data-driven decision-making across fast-growing sectors such as government, defense, and enterprise analytics.
An AI-driven comparison between D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) and IonQ (IONQ) points to IonQ as the stronger opportunity heading into 2026. The analysis highlights IONQ’s gate-based, trapped-ion quantum architecture, which supports a wide range of algorithms and positions the company for broader adoption across AI, simulation, and cryptography.
An AI-driven comparison of Rigetti Computing (RGTI) and D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) points to Rigetti as the more compelling opportunity heading into 2026. The analysis highlights RGTI’s gate-based quantum architecture, which supports universal quantum computing and a wide range of complex algorithms. While D-Wave remains a leader in quantum annealing for optimization problems, Rigetti’s full-stack, gate-based approach offers greater scalability and broader long-term applications.
An AI-driven comparison of Rigetti Computing (RGTI) and TeraWulf (WULF) points to TeraWulf as the more attractive investment heading into 2026. The analysis emphasizes WULF’s large-scale digital infrastructure supporting Bitcoin mining and high-performance computing (HPC), which generates immediate revenue in expanding digital asset and AI-driven markets.
An AI-driven comparison between Rocket Lab USA (RKLB) and Planet Labs (PL) identifies Rocket Lab as the more compelling investment heading into 2026. The analysis highlights RKLB’s vertically integrated space services and consistent launch performance, which position the company to benefit from rising demand for satellite deployment and space infrastructure.
An AI-driven comparison of Tempus AI (TEM) and Doximity (DOCS) points to Tempus AI as the more compelling investment opportunity heading into 2026. The analysis highlights TEM’s AI-powered precision medicine platform, which applies advanced analytics and genomic data to transform diagnostics and treatment in oncology and cardiology.
An AI-driven comparison of UnitedHealth Group (UNH) and CVS Health (CVS) points to UnitedHealth as the stronger investment heading into 2026. The analysis emphasizes UNH’s deeply integrated healthcare model, combining insurance, data analytics, pharmacy services, and care delivery into a single ecosystem. This structure provides resilience and earnings stability in an increasingly complex healthcare environment.
An AI-driven comparison of Netflix (NFLX) and Disney (DIS) points to Netflix as the more attractive investment heading into 2026. The analysis emphasizes Netflix’s focused, pure-play streaming model and its continued investment in original content, which support strong subscriber engagement as viewing habits shift further toward digital platforms.
An AI-driven comparison of Coca-Cola (KO) and PepsiCo (PEP) points to PepsiCo as the more compelling investment for 2026. The analysis emphasizes PepsiCo’s diversified business model, which combines beverages with a broad snack portfolio and provides greater resilience as consumer preferences evolve.
An AI-driven comparison of Philip Morris (PM) and British American Tobacco (BTI) points to Philip Morris as the more attractive investment for 2026. The analysis highlights PM’s accelerated transition toward smoke-free products, which positions the company for sustainable growth as global regulations continue to pressure traditional combustible tobacco.
SoundThinking, Inc. (SSTI), a developer of precision-policing and security technologies, has faced a difficult trading environment in recent weeks. With shares trading in the single digits, the stock reflects broader investor hesitation toward small-cap tech amid ongoing economic uncertainty. The company’s market capitalization stands near $100 million, and its valuation metrics suggest skepticism around its growth outlook.
Lionheart Holdings (CUB) has traded quietly in recent sessions, reflecting the typical behavior of a SPAC still in its pre-merger search phase. Shares have hovered close to the company’s IPO price, supported by low volatility and thin trading volumes. This pattern mirrors broader trends across the SPAC market, where investor engagement often remains subdued until a definitive acquisition agreement is announced.
Astronics Corporation has delivered solid share price performance in recent sessions, benefiting from renewed enthusiasm for aerospace and defense equities. The stock has demonstrated resilience despite broader market volatility, drawing consistent investor interest due to its exposure to mission-critical avionics, power systems, and test equipment.