VOO vs VTV: Contrasting Broad S&P 500 Exposure with Value Strategies

Key Takeaways

• VOO tracks the broad, market-capitalization-weighted S&P 500 Index, while VTV tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index, which selects large-cap stocks on value factors.
• VOO is heavily concentrated in technology (roughly 38–39% of assets), whereas VTV is led by financials, health care, and industrials with a much smaller technology footprint.
• Both funds charge the same ultra-low expense ratio of 0.03%, making cost a non-differentiator between them.
• VOO offers growth-oriented mega-cap leadership (Nvidia, Apple, Microsoft), while VTV offers a more diversified, dividend-friendly, value-oriented lineup (JPMorgan, Berkshire Hathaway, ExxonMobil).
• The two ETFs represent different risk profiles: VOO carries higher concentration and growth-style sensitivity, while VTV is typically less volatile and more defensive during sector rotations.
• Both are passively managed, fully transparent, and highly liquid, making them structural rather than tactical instruments.

Introduction

Comparing the VOO and VTV exchange-traded funds (ETFs) is timely because the market has been oscillating between growth leadership and a rotation into cheaper, cash-generating value companies. These two funds do not compete directly; instead, they offer alternative exposures within the U.S. large-cap equity universe. VOO captures the entire S&P 500, while VTV isolates the value segment. For investors deciding where to anchor a core U.S. equity allocation, understanding the structural differences between broad-market and value-tilted exposure is essential in the current environment of elevated valuations and shifting interest-rate expectations. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how the funds compare to others in the industry.

VOO Overview

The Vanguard S&P 500 ETF seeks to track the S&P 500 Index, a market-capitalization-weighted benchmark of roughly 500 of the largest U.S. companies. It holds approximately 505–520 securities, spanning all major sectors, and is passively managed with an expense ratio of 0.03%. Its portfolio is dominated by mega-cap technology. Top holdings typically include NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, AMZN, GOOGL, and AVGO, with the top 10 positions representing roughly 37–38% of assets. Information technology is the largest sector at about 38–39%, followed by financials (about 12%), communication services (about 9.5%), and consumer discretionary (about 9%). Because it is market-cap-weighted, its performance is closely tied to a relatively small group of mega-cap growth names.

VTV Overview

The Vanguard Value ETF seeks to track the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index, which selects and weights large-cap U.S. stocks using multiple value metrics such as price-to-book, forward earnings, and dividend yield. It holds roughly 310–330 securities and is passively managed with the same 0.03% expense ratio as VOO. VTV looks markedly different from the broad market. Financials are the largest sector at about 23%, followed by health care (about 16%), technology (about 14%), industrials (about 13%), and energy (about 8%). Its top holdings typically include JPM, BRK.B, XOM, JNJ, WMT, and MU, with the top 10 positions accounting for only about 22–24% of assets. This lower concentration and sector mix produce a more balanced, dividend-oriented profile than the S&P 500.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both funds operate within the U.S. large-cap equity market, but they are influenced by different macro forces. VOO is highly sensitive to the artificial-intelligence (AI) and semiconductor investment cycle, mega-cap earnings momentum, and valuations in the technology sector. VTV is more exposed to interest-rate expectations, bank net interest margins, energy prices, and the defensive cash flows of health care and consumer staples. Recent market cycles have featured periodic rotations between growth and value as investors weigh elevated mega-cap multiples against cheaper, dividend-paying businesses. Rising bond yields, shifts in Federal Reserve policy expectations, and concerns about AI-related capital spending can all tilt the balance.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent years, VOO has generally led on the back of mega-cap technology and AI enthusiasm, while VTV has trailed during strong growth rallies. However, in recent months, value-oriented sectors such as financials, health care, and energy have at times outperformed, narrowing or reversing that gap as investors rotated away from crowded growth positions. On a relative basis, VOO tends to exhibit higher volatility and greater top-heavy concentration risk, while VTV offers a smoother, more diversified return profile with a higher dividend yield. The divergence in sector weighting means the two funds frequently move in different directions within the same market cycle.

Using Tickeron’s AI Screener for ETF Analysis

In my own research process, Tickeron’s AI Screener has become a reliable way to quickly compare broad-market and value-tilted funds like these. It lets me apply customizable filters for sector exposure, volatility, and performance metrics, surfacing clearer distinctions without hours of manual work. This kind of tool helps confirm the structural differences I outlined above and supports more informed allocation decisions when weighing growth versus value exposure.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Contributor

Scott Bell|Expert

I’m a trader and independent researcher. My interest lies at the intersection of financial markets, algorithms, and capital management. I develop data-driven tools and strategies and study algorithmic approaches to market analysis. I help turn complex market data into clear insights and practical systems. I believe technology should support, not replace, investment thinking

Notable companies

Industry description

Market Cap

High and low price notable news

Volume